website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Ice Hockey 2018 - 2019 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Dmitry said:

2 penalty shots in the same play was in the game Lada vs. Chelmet in VHL in September. There were foul and the goalkeeper come in before 6th player got away.
Chelmet missed both chances but they won anyway.

 

wow, thanks. :yes

 

Have not noticed this. so whats are the chances something like this happened twice in a season. ? but the goalie jumping on the ice lol what a dumb move, they already had to face a penalty shot, so why offer them another scoring chance :crazy:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-186869
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hckosice said:

 

wow, thanks. :yes

 

Have not noticed this. so whats are the chances something like this happened twice in a season. ? but the goalie jumping on the ice lol what a dumb move, they already had to face a penalty shot, so why offer them another scoring chance :crazy:

But the goalie stopped the puck and Chelmet didn't score. And he stopped both penalty shot... :mumble: 

It's interesting to see 3 penalty shots in the same play one day... :d

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-186870
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Dmitry said:

But the goalie stopped the puck and Chelmet didn't score. And he stopped both penalty shot... :mumble: 

It's interesting to see 3 penalty shots in the same play one day... :d

 

I mean, it was quite risky and not really the smartest move ever :d but the guy is lucky enough, he stopped the penalty shots so everything turned to be fine at the end :d

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-186871
Share on other sites

5 ore fa, hckosice ha scritto:

@phelps

 

Another bizarre stuff happened at the Junior World Championships last night in the :SUI vs :RUS match

 

For the first time in Ice Hockey history, a team received 2 penalty shots in the same play :d This in fact probably never happened anywhere before. no one in the stands understood what just happened :lol:

 

In the same attack Marc Lehmann was 2 times fouled by Dmitri Samorukov, as the foul occured on a attacking player in breakaway as the last man in front of opponents net and thus losing a clear chance to score Switzerland received a penalty shot, but since there were actually 2 fouls, they received 2 penalty shots, so 2 chances to scores. Something you´ll probably never see anywhere outside of the Basketball free throws I guess :d

 

the funny thing is that SUI missed both penalties then :lol:

 

EPIC

 

 

 

 

 

yeah, I saw the match on the Czech TV (delayed replay, not live, of course) and it was really funny, to say the least...

 

I must admit I've never seen anything like that (never read about the VHL episode earlier this year)...and I also never thought it was possible...

 

so, it's never too late to learn something new...:lol:

 

p.s. by the way, I also found this:

 

"According to the official IIHF rule guidebook, here is how referees are instructed to handle two (or more) penalty shots awarded on the same play:

“If the referee signals a penalty shot, and before the play is whistled because of a goal or to call the penalty shot another foul is assessed to the same team, the additional penalty will be assessed regardless if the skater scores on either the play or the subsequent penalty shot.” — IIHF Rule 1164 (iv) [IIHF.com]

Should two penalty shots be awarded to the same team at the same stoppage of play (for two separate fouls), only one goal can be scored. Should the first penalty shot result in a goal, the second penalty shot is automatically cancelled, but the appropriate penalty is assessed for the second infraction. If the first shot is unsuccessful, the second shot is taken. The order of the penalty shots will be decided by the order of the infractions during game action.” — IIHF Rule 1169 (vi) [IIHF.com]

Essentially, because Lehmann was fouled by Samorukov but still maintained possession of the puck, play was allowed to continue. Samorukov taking Lehmann down a second time, on the same play, warranted a second penalty shot — but Switzerland would only have one goal count, regardless.

It didn’t really matter, because Switzerland didn’t score on either penalty shot."

 

p.s. @Dmitry thanks for the info about the previous "double penalty shot" episode...:yes

 

p.p.s. personally, I think it's a very weird rule...imho, they should go with a penalty shot for the first infraction and then 2-min penalties for every subsequent foul...

2 shots (of which only 1 would count anyway) are just senseless to me...

Edited by phelps
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-186875
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, phelps said:

 

yeah, I saw the match on the Czech TV (delayed replay, not live, of course) and it was really funny, to say the least...

 

I must admit I've never seen anything like that (never read about the VHL episode earlier this year)...and I also never thought it was possible...

 

so, it's never too late to learn something new...:lol:

 

p.s. by the way, I also found this:

 

"According to the official IIHF rule guidebook, here is how referees are instructed to handle two (or more) penalty shots awarded on the same play:

“If the referee signals a penalty shot, and before the play is whistled because of a goal or to call the penalty shot another foul is assessed to the same team, the additional penalty will be assessed regardless if the skater scores on either the play or the subsequent penalty shot.” — IIHF Rule 1164 (iv) [IIHF.com]

Should two penalty shots be awarded to the same team at the same stoppage of play (for two separate fouls), only one goal can be scored. Should the first penalty shot result in a goal, the second penalty shot is automatically cancelled, but the appropriate penalty is assessed for the second infraction. If the first shot is unsuccessful, the second shot is taken. The order of the penalty shots will be decided by the order of the infractions during game action.” — IIHF Rule 1169 (vi) [IIHF.com]

Essentially, because Lehmann was fouled by Samorukov but still maintained possession of the puck, play was allowed to continue. Samorukov taking Lehmann down a second time, on the same play, warranted a second penalty shot — but Switzerland would only have one goal count, regardless.

It didn’t really matter, because Switzerland didn’t score on either penalty shot."

 

p.s. @Dmitry thanks for the info about the previous "double penalty shot" episode...:yes

 

p.p.s. personally, I think it's a very weird rule...imho, they should go with a penalty shot for the first infraction and then 2-min penalties for every subsequent foul...

2 shots (of which only 1 would count anyway) are just senseless to me...

 

Aaah ok ! thanks.

 

I never heard (nor imagined that eventuality) about such rule before, so thanks for explaining. so basically you can have 2 or more penalty shots at the same play, but if you score one of them the next ones are cancelled becoming normal power plays. :yes

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-186903
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, intoronto said:

 

I take it some 5% chance to happen :d this will never happen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-187302
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hckosice said:

 

I take it some 5% chance to happen :d this will never happen

If the IIHF wants it and has the support of Canada/USA it will happen. Especially since if they smaller ice helps in bringing the NHL to Beijing. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-187303
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, intoronto said:

If the IIHF wants it and has the support of Canada/USA it will happen. Especially since if they smaller ice helps in bringing the NHL to Beijing. 

 

I do not trust Fasel in anything lately, he is going to retire, so this was just another of his empty speaches, really, there no way for that to happen, maybe the Olympic tournament in Beijing can be played on N-A sized rinks, but certainly not the other major events held in Europe. European federations will never agree with that.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/1138-ice-hockey-2018-2019-discussion-thread/page/18/#findComment-187304
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Some of the small nations have competed in the past but usually lost 30-0 to the Aussies
    • Officials persons (include Head) of RLF are still in ban. For example, Vaelbe has spoken even more terrible words but, however, CAS obliged to gave them AIN status. And it's the same situation here - FIL must to implement CAS's decision. But it's not clearly FIL's criterias for AIN status and that too strange
    • For Modern Pentathlon, it's interesting that Africa only gets one continental championship spot, considering how well Egypt does in the event.  (But then again, it's max 2 athletes per NOC per gender.)  Presuming that an Egyptian wins the African CCh, I suppose their performance in the other major competitions will allow the second competitor to come through.
    • Statement from the president of the russian Luge federation (yesterday): "Our team is in Kazakhstan and is preparing to apply for U.S. visas. We are setting an example for our entire country, especially for the younger generation. They see that a difficult path is not a reason to give up. It teaches perseverance. In this perseverance lies our shared strength, our mission to millions of young people for whom sports are a guiding point and a shining star. I believe in our country, in our strong-spirited guys. I sincerely love and respect our president, Vladimir Putin. He is the best president in the world. May God grant him strength and good health."   Do they deserve neutral status?
    • I did not think it would happen again but... I created similar post for Paris - 2024 https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27489-ain-athletes-qualification-for-paris-2024-olympic-games-and-reallocation-of-quotas-post1-updated-1507/#comments  I was not sure if that reallocations would really happen but the reality was even more serious than the expectations. According to this research 43% of the neutral statuses issued by the IFs were fake AIN  - https://razom22.com/neutrality-research/  And the figures are based on the IOC decisions - not on the evaluations by Ukrainian NOC or sport ministry. Right now the situation is absolutely unclear. As usually )) Some notes: 1. Russians will not reject quotas for 2026 as they did for 2024 in judo and wrestling. 2. AINERP may be more loyal to russians due to the new member - Watanabe. His federation issued AIN status to Melnikova who took part in the primaries of the russian ruling party, had phots with Z and e .t.c. 3. I do not expect a lot of reallocations becaues of the total small number of the rus/blr athletes in qualification events right now. 4. BUT, even with these small numbers we see that FIS allowed to compete several incompliant persons.        Short notes from the IOC statement before Paris - 2024:   1. IOC`s decisions to reject quotas are final. 2. IOC`s decisions to approve quotas are not final - new facts may lead to the rejection of invitation. 3. IOC`s decisions cannot be appealed - NOCs were not invited to the Games, so it is a good will to invite individual athletes... or not   russians Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Adeliia PETROSIAN Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC Figure skating Petr GUMENNIK Men's singles Davide Lewton Brain Confirmed by IOC belorussians     Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Viktoriya SAFONOVA Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC  
    • I would say they will not be eligible. But it realy abotut the wording every federation has in its papers. World Aquatics changes their policies several times (especially after Mazepin "solved the issues" persoanlly - as witnessed one russian Olympic champion)   Inoirtnat notes on FIS decisions:   FIS points are frozen for ruissns and belorussians - so the situation is not so complicated for a lot of them. The list of the AIN`s is not final as the list from ISU was. It means that persons mau be not only removed from the list but added as well. I expect russians to try some freestyle applications before the stage in China, for example. FIS has not problems with the deny of visa or entris by the host countries. So they kept the possibility to close the doors for the russians for all the countries as ICF did. No sanctions for this, no removing events from the Olympic qualification list, no host changes,   * * * * * Here is the the relevant extract from FIS papers for Aerials tram event. What do you think?
    • Not only Korostelev but all 3 russian entries. I will bring the detail 
    • And will bet that the IBU is a lot richer than the FIS because their wealth is based on German TV contracts.  
    • Russians filed an appeal to CAS against IBU. But I do not believe they will get any result in time to grab quotas. I suppose IBU will not agree to have "fast" hearings as FIS did. And i suppose IBU will fight in CAS without intention to lose as FIS did.
×
×
  • Create New...