Mountain Bike Cycling Qualification to Summer Olympic Games Paris 2024

[Epic Failure 355]

I'm not sure that is correct.

 

Firstly I don't think the UCI have updated the rankings this week to show the final situation. So the calculations below are using last week's rankings (updated 20th May). I think some of the positions might have changed (ie I think have snuck into the top 8).

 

Secondly, I think you are using the general national rankings, which are not the same as the Olympic qualifcation rankings. I've linked what I believe are the correct rankings below to each category.

 

But using last week's rankings right now, I believe the following is accurate:

 

Men - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/220?disciplineId=7&groupId=136&momentId=179458&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=22&raceTypeId=0

 

Top 8 (2 spots) - , , , , , , ,  

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,

 

African spot -         

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

That's because I believe from the qualification doc - https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Paris-2024/Paris2024-QS-UCI-MountainBike.pdf - that the spots get reassigned to previously unqualified NOCs, not a second spot to those who have a spot in rankings already. The spots from specific races go to the first unqualified nation in that race. France's host spot goes to the first unqualified nation in the rankings.

 

Women - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/221?disciplineId=7&groupId=137&momentId=179459&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=23&raceTypeId=0

 

 

Top 8 (2 spots) -  , , , , , , ,     

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,  

 

African spot -  

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,  

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

I think I'm right (again, allowing for any changes in the rankings this weekend). But I wouldn't guarantee it.

Edited May 27 by Epic Failure

[Benolympique 2,398]

48 minutes ago, Epic Failure said:

I'm not sure that is correct.

 

Firstly I don't think the UCI have updated the rankings this week to show the final situation. So the calculations below are using last week's rankings (updated 20th May). I think some of the positions might have changed (ie I think have snuck into the top 8).

 

Secondly, I think you are using the general national rankings, which are not the same as the Olympic qualifcation rankings. I've linked what I believe are the correct rankings below to each category.

 

But using last week's rankings right now, I believe the following is accurate:

 

Men - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/220?disciplineId=7&groupId=136&momentId=179458&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=22&raceTypeId=0

 

Top 8 (2 spots) - , , , , , , ,  

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,

 

African spot -         

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

That's because I believe from the qualification doc - https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Paris-2024/Paris2024-QS-UCI-MountainBike.pdf - that the spots get reassigned to previously unqualified NOCs, not a second spot to those who have a spot in rankings already. The spots from specific races go to the first unqualified nation in that race. France's host spot goes to the first unqualified nation in the rankings.

 

Women - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/221?disciplineId=7&groupId=137&momentId=179459&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=23&raceTypeId=0

 

 

Top 8 (2 spots) -  , , , , , , ,     

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,  

 

African spot -  

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,  

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

I think I'm right (again, allowing for any changes in the rankings this weekend). But I wouldn't guarantee it.

And tripartite ? Any idea ?

[Epic Failure 355]

22 minutes ago, Benolympique said:

And tripartite ? Any idea ?

No idea I'm afraid.

[intoronto 5,589]

23 minutes ago, Benolympique said:

And tripartite ? Any idea ?

possibly 

[intoronto 5,589]

1 hour ago, Benolympique said:

And tripartite ? Any idea ?

Also see  in the ranking, and as @JoshMartini007mentioned there aren't a lot of options for  this cycle, so its possible their hands are forced 

[mpjmcevoy 362]

3 hours ago, Epic Failure said:

I'm not sure that is correct.

 

Firstly I don't think the UCI have updated the rankings this week to show the final situation. So the calculations below are using last week's rankings (updated 20th May). I think some of the positions might have changed (ie I think have snuck into the top 8).

 

Secondly, I think you are using the general national rankings, which are not the same as the Olympic qualifcation rankings. I've linked what I believe are the correct rankings below to each category.

 

But using last week's rankings right now, I believe the following is accurate:

 

Men - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/220?disciplineId=7&groupId=136&momentId=179458&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=22&raceTypeId=0

 

Top 8 (2 spots) - , , , , , , ,  

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,

 

African spot -         

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

That's because I believe from the qualification doc - https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Paris-2024/Paris2024-QS-UCI-MountainBike.pdf - that the spots get reassigned to previously unqualified NOCs, not a second spot to those who have a spot in rankings already. The spots from specific races go to the first unqualified nation in that race. France's host spot goes to the first unqualified nation in the rankings.

 

Women - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/221?disciplineId=7&groupId=137&momentId=179459&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=23&raceTypeId=0

 

 

Top 8 (2 spots) -  , , , , , , ,     

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,  

 

African spot -  

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,  

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

I think I'm right (again, allowing for any changes in the rankings this weekend). But I wouldn't guarantee it.

GBR needed to net Denmark by just over 100 points - in the event, I think they've taken them for about 250 - certainly tom and Charlie netted about 300 odd over the danes in the senior races, and I don't think the U23 Danes got anything super back.. The GB women hardly scored this weekend, but had a rather handy  4-500 point lead over Brazil and Germany.

[heywoodu 14,911]

5 hours ago, Epic Failure said:

I'm not sure that is correct.

 

Firstly I don't think the UCI have updated the rankings this week to show the final situation. So the calculations below are using last week's rankings (updated 20th May). I think some of the positions might have changed (ie I think have snuck into the top 8).

 

Secondly, I think you are using the general national rankings, which are not the same as the Olympic qualifcation rankings. I've linked what I believe are the correct rankings below to each category.

 

But using last week's rankings right now, I believe the following is accurate:

 

Men - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/220?disciplineId=7&groupId=136&momentId=179458&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=22&raceTypeId=0

 

Top 8 (2 spots) - , , , , , , ,  

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,

 

African spot -         

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

That's because I believe from the qualification doc - https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Paris-2024/Paris2024-QS-UCI-MountainBike.pdf - that the spots get reassigned to previously unqualified NOCs, not a second spot to those who have a spot in rankings already. The spots from specific races go to the first unqualified nation in that race. France's host spot goes to the first unqualified nation in the rankings.

 

Women - https://dataride.uci.ch/iframe/RankingDetails/221?disciplineId=7&groupId=137&momentId=179459&disciplineSeasonId=431&rankingTypeId=3&categoryId=23&raceTypeId=0

 

 

Top 8 (2 spots) -  , , , , , , ,     

 

9-19 (1 spot) - , , , , , , , , , ,  

 

African spot -  

Pan American spot -

Asian spot -

WC spots - ,  

U23 spots - ,

host spot -

 

I think I'm right (again, allowing for any changes in the rankings this weekend). But I wouldn't guarantee it.

On Wikipedia they are apparently using the regular ranking?  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_at_the_2024_Summer_Olympics_–_Qualification#Mountain_biking

 

Spoiler

 

 

[Epic Failure 355]

3 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

On Wikipedia they are apparently using the regular ranking?  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_at_the_2024_Summer_Olympics_–_Qualification#Mountain_biking

 

  Hide contents

 

 

Yeah, I'd seen that as well. If I got a pound/euro/dollar for every incorrect piece of sporting info on wiki....I'd have several more pounds/euros/dollars than I do now!

[heywoodu 14,911]

24 minutes ago, Epic Failure said:

Yeah, I'd seen that as well. If I got a pound/euro/dollar for every incorrect piece of sporting info on wiki....I'd have several more pounds/euros/dollars than I do now!

 

 

I guess we'll have to wait for UCI to make any announcement. The Olympic ranking on their website isn't updated yet, so who knows  

[Cmon Mary 27]

6 hours ago, mpjmcevoy said:

GBR needed to net Denmark by just over 100 points - in the event, I think they've taken them for about 250 - certainly tom and Charlie netted about 300 odd over the danes in the senior races, and I don't think the U23 Danes got anything super back.. The GB women hardly scored this weekend, but had a rather handy  4-500 point lead over Brazil and Germany.

Rankings now updated to as at 25/5/24 confirming your calls - yeah!  Pidcock is a monster.