website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

India National Thread


gvaisakh
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, nitinsanker said:

what kind of international success do we expect when there is no association no govt funding etc..............

( whether the scoring patterns are accurate etc is a different matter ............... ans of course they should changed)  ...our boxers are doing badly not because of the scoring patterns or conspiracy theory but because we have had no assoc or funding ..... some boxers like shiva,  vikas, sumit  and manoj are funded by OGQ...so will do well but others are in bad state  ......we will have a maximum of 2-3 quota places in boxing ...........

 That was the whole point! Power hungry officials have screwed the sport which could have been easily flourishing right now.

Edited by Vaibhav (minchu)
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23950
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, nitinsanker said:

awesome just 3 kg below his own record in the 77 kg category ...this would be around 12-15 best in the world in 2015 ........which is great score ...... I am sure he can try to cross 340 in the olympics which if he does means he can come in the top 10 which for mens weightlifting would be a great result ....................any news on how vikas thakur did in the 85 I felt he was doing very well too 

 Vikas was brilliant too. He broke his own NR of 154 kg in snatch by a unit more. No information on his overall score. I am guessing he might have missed out very narrowly to Satish. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23951
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Vaibhav (minchu) said:

 That was the whole point! Power hungry officials have screwed the sport which could have been easily flourishing right now.

 

 

7+1 quotas in 2012 ------->1( maybe 1-2 more from baku ) in 2016 .................. Thanks to Abhay Chautala desperation to have another source of political influence .....

 

I wish our Politicians   would stay out of sports :wall:

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23956
Share on other sites

I think we do much better with   sportspeople  at the head ...currently we have a few 

 

Raninder Singh - President heading the NRAI - he was a world class shooter and recently he won the Trap competition at the National 

Adil sumariwalla - President heading AFI -     Olympic runner 1980- Indian record holder 100m forsome time 

 

are there any other ??? ......... I think these two are the better  federations ( see the results of quotas ) 

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23958
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, kavitachoudhary89 said:

 

Also means that Wawrinka and Bencic are not playing !!!! Though, mixed doubles decisions can always change at the last minute...

 

And Nadal/Lopez are playing while Nadal/Muruguzza is also a strong possibility...

Edited by kapil857
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23964
Share on other sites

This is so unfair. There should be some criteria for playing doubles and mixed doubles tennis at Olympics. Singles players will easily dominate the regular doubles players.

Criteria like considering only doubles rank to play in doubles. Why should singles rank be considered

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23966
Share on other sites

 

22 minutes ago, Smit said:

Dutee Chand clocked 11.41s to in heats to qualify for Finals at a meet in Kazakhstan.

Olympic mark: 11:32s

:fingers:

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/216/#findComment-23972
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When it comes to power, confidence and match-winning ability, women's cricket has produced some truly fearless batsmen over the years. These players didn't just score runs - they changed games, calmed crowds and intimidated bowlers. Based on influence, consistency and ability to dominate attacks, here is my 2026 Forum list of the top 7 most dangerous women batsmen in cricket history.   At the top, Meg Lanning stands out for her quiet aggression and leadership. She could control an innings and then suddenly explode. Behind her is Harmanpreet Kaur, known for her raw power and clutch performances, especially in big tournaments.   Ellyse Perry deserves a special mention. Her technique, fitness and ability to increase pace make her lethal in all formats. Smriti Mandhana brings purpose with grandeur - once she gets going, bowlers struggle to find answers.   From a bygone era, Mithali Raj may not have looked aggressive, but her mental strength and ability to bat for long periods make her extremely dangerous. Suzy Bats has become a nightmare for bowlers in ODIs and T20s, as she mixes timing and smart shot selection. The list also includes Deandra Dottin, whose power-hitting can change a match in just a few overs.   What connects all these stars is their fearless mentality. Each has earned the tag of Dangerous Women's Batsman by performing consistently under pressure and against the best bowlers in the world. For fans who love in-depth cricket discussions, statistics and trending topics, Cricbites is becoming a popular platform to explore women's cricket in a fresh and engaging way.
    • Someone made this Statue Trump---Epstein     mysterious bronze statue called “Best Friends Forever” has popped up on the east end of the National Mall in Washington, DC,    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/us/politics/trump-epstein-statue-dc-national-mall.html    
    • Off to Milan for the 145th session of the International Olympic Committee. Although the agenda has not been published yet, there shouldn’t be any major items over these two days, apart from the election of a member of the IOC Executive Board. This will be the eighth time the session is held in Italy, the last one being during the Turin 2006 Olympic Games.
    • another wave of mega rain is coming in north Africa 
    • What is happening in Canada , people leave it  They say life is very expensive , you cant find an appartement , the salary is miserable    is it the multi tax of Trump? 
    • Weightlifting We now have six events per gender with a total of 10 athletes per event.   The Olympic Qualification Rankings will be based on the sum of the total results of five events (three from period 1 and two from period 2). The top 8 will qualify.   The 9th spot will also be based on the OQR, but it will go to the highest ranked athlete from an unrepresented continent.   The 10th spot will be split between the host and universality (3 each per gender). Should the United States qualify normally then their host quota will be reduced, first going to an athlete from an unrepresented continent then to the overall highest ranked athlete.   Additionally, a "Best Lifter" will be awarded which would give the nation the chance to qualify 4 athletes rather than the max of 3.
    • The probability of winning a medal in the men's 500m also seems a bit off   
    • 66% chance for a medal in moguls seems low though...   Men's relay being 5th in short track, and Clarke only having a 0.5% chance at a medal also seem off   Why is ski mountaineering there, we didn't even qualify anyone 
×
×
  • Create New...