website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Winter Olympic Games Beijing 2022 Olympic Sports Programme


Recommended Posts

Also, Why was the Biathlon Single Mixed Relay not included. It has been successfully held already, a high rate of participation, and would not require an increase in quotas.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151983
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nate River said:

FIS says that either Alpine Combined or Parallel Slalom will be included. Decision will be made by November.

Ugh, we all know what that's gonna be.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151984
Share on other sites

9 minuti fa, Olympian1010 ha scritto:

He’s better than Avery Brundage, and J. Rouge

 

sure...if you think that even "the Donald" is better than Hitler and Stalin...:whistle:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151985
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Olympian1010 said:

Also, Why was the Biathlon Single Mixed Relay not included. It has been successfully held already, a hate rate of pracipation, and would require an increase in quotas

 

Because the single mixed relay in biathlon is the absolute perfect event for show events and demonstrations (like Biathlon auf Schalke in Gelsenkirchen).

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151986
Share on other sites

il y a 13 minutes, Olympian1010 a déclaré:

That will increase though, as nations see an opportunity to medal

 

Any event will see participation grow if they were included in the olympics. Doesn't make it right 

Edited by De_Gambassi
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151988
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, De_Gambassi said:

 

Any event will see participation grow if they were included in the olympics. Doesn't make it right 

Exactly. Events should not be put in the Olympics to make them grow, events should be interesting enough to grow before they're being put in the Olympics. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151989
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

Because the single mixed relay in biathlon is the absolute perfect event for show events and demonstrations (like Biathlon auf Schalke in Gelsenkirchen).

Why add an event that makes the most sense? IOC Logic..

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151992
Share on other sites

Just now, intoronto said:

Why add an event that makes the most sense? IOC Logic..

I meant it's a good thing they didn't add the single mixed relay, because in my opinion that is 100% perfect for show events, but rather mediocre to have in a serious competition. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151993
Share on other sites

Besides, how many opportunities the same set of people should have to rack up medals doing basically the exact same thing. ?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151996
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, De_Gambassi said:

Besides, how many opportunities the same set of people should have to rack up medals doing basically the exact same thing. ?

That is if the best athletes even will compete in all events. I can imagine a situation where you've got a mixed relay and a single mixed relay both with around 50% of the best athletes. That's not great.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/706-winter-olympic-games-beijing-2022-olympic-sports-programme/page/14/#findComment-151998
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...