Athletics 2016 Discussion Thread

[intoronto 5,638]

Lol world selects are doing well#!

[zob79 189]

12 hours ago, dareza said:

Toader was positive on doping

 

Correction, he was negative in Poland, as he was in previous 10 WADA controls this year. He supposedly was tested positive at a domestic contest; however, you missed school that day we learned that until the finish of the investigation the athlete is considered innocent.

[Майкл 561]

9 hours ago, zob79 said:

Correction, he was negative in Poland, as he was in previous 10 WADA controls this year. He supposedly was tested positive at a domestic contest; however, you missed school that day we learned that until the finish of the investigation the athlete is considered innocent.

 

Supposedly? Are you being serious?  One is either tested positive or negative, there's no third option.

 

If he had really been tested positive, Romanian federation should've suspended him.

Edited July 24, 2016 by Майкл

[zob79 189]

4 hours ago, Майкл said:

 

Supposedly? Are you being serious?  One is either tested positive or negative, there's no third option.

 

If he had really been tested positive, Romanian federation should've suspended him.

 

Yes, I'm serious 

 I see English language has many secrets you haven't unraveled yet. "supposedly" means the B sample hasn't been analysed, thus this case is yet to be concluded and the athlete is considered innocent until the finish of the investigation, so some internet trolls should behave

Edited July 24, 2016 by zob79

[DaniSRB 899]

Romanian Olympic Committee already announced he is not going to Olympics

[heywoodu 15,135]

A-sample was positive, meaning he should be provisionally suspended and probably he is. 

B-sample will most likely be positive (only in extremely rare cases the B-sample comes back negative), and then he should get the real ban.

 

Until then, he's a suspected athlete, not a convicted doper yet, but someone who will most likely be a convicted doper quite soon. 

 

It's really that simple  

[zob79 189]

6 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

A-sample was positive, meaning he should be provisionally suspended and probably he is. 

B-sample will most likely be positive (only in extremely rare cases the B-sample comes back negative), and then he should get the real ban.

 

Until then, he's a suspected athlete, not a convicted doper yet, but someone who will most likely be a convicted doper quite soon. 

 

It's really that simple  

 

Evrika! you have found it. I said exactly the same things, btw 

My emphasis is on the principle of not being guilty until proven, which is a step stone of democracy; is it that difficult for some trolls to contain themselves until he is fukin PROVEN GUILTY? then they can rejoice all over

 

Edited July 24, 2016 by zob79

[heywoodu 15,135]

Just now, zob79 said:

 

Evrika! you have found it. I said exactly the same things, btw 

My emphasis is on the principle of not being guilty until proven, which is a step stone of democracy; is it that difficult for some trolls to contain themselves until he is fukin PROVEN GUILTY? 

 

 

I think it's because of the way you have reacted to some positives from other nations (the Hungarians, for example). Anyway, let's all try and treat every situation like this, no matter if they are from Romania, Hungary, the Netherlands or whatever

[zob79 189]

1 minute ago, heywoodu said:

 

I think it's because of the way you have reacted to some positives from other nations (the Hungarians, for example). Anyway, let's all try and treat every situation like this, no matter if they are from Romania, Hungary, the Netherlands or whatever

 

That would be perfect

[OlympicsFan 858]

vor 10 Minuten schrieb heywoodu:

A-sample was positive, meaning he should be provisionally suspended and probably he is. 

B-sample will most likely be positive (only in extremely rare cases the B-sample comes back negative), and then he should get the real ban.

 

Until then, he's a suspected athlete, not a convicted doper yet, but someone who will most likely be a convicted doper quite soon. 

 

It's really that simple  

I really dont see the problem here, our serbian friend didnt say anything wrong (sorry, i cant "understand" his name ...).

Our romanian friend said that he "supposedly" tested positive, but i think there is no doubt that he tested positive (A-sample) and our serbian friend didnt say anything else. His A-sample was positive, we still have to wait for the B-sample.

If he really tested positive before the start of the junior world championships and romanian federation knew about it, then they never should have allowed him to compete there, i completely agree with our serbian friend about this, he stole a medal from someone else and that should not have been allowed.

Edited July 24, 2016 by OlympicsFan