website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Olympic sports program review


Recommended Posts

So, while Paris is still fresh on our minds, what are your main thoughts about the olympic sports program ?

 

I'll start :

 

  • That's my biggest takeaway : I've missed so, so, much of the good stuff. There are too many events cramped in a 17 days period, specially during the first week. IMO, we are either moving to a three weeks period to help spreading the sports, or we should move back to a ~300 events olympics like in the 2000's

 

  • They definitely should drop the 4*400 mixed relay while it was a nice event by itself, if some of the best athletes don't compete, scrap it. 

 

  • Race walking could (should ?) be dropped tomorrow and be replaced by cross country running and not many will miss it

 

  • While I always have been a massive "cut the swimming events by half" enthusiast, I've been pleasantly surprised by the variety of podiums between the 100/200m distances (And yes, ofc, Léon Marchand helps me having another view on the matter :p). I'd still cut a couple of the relays at least.

 

  • Diving is relaxing, but it's a really a small sport. Not sure we really need to double up chinese golds with all 4 synchro events though. High diving must be considered at some point.

 

  • Open Water swimming need more events, I'd like to move the 1500m to open water and probably add a relay

 

  • I've been surprised by the pentathlon event. The huge crowd and the setting helped a lot to vindicate the sport. Unfortunately, I think dropping the equestrian will hurt the sport a lot. As it stand, the sport does kind of make sense (it helps if you're a french aristocrat from the 19th century, but still). With obstacle running coming up, I have a feeling we will see a random collection of five sports with no coherence at all. Equestrian might have been the last saving grace of the sport.

 

  • Like OW swimming, I don't like sports (and venues) to be limited to two events. It seems a bit of waste. For instance, I'd like MTB cycling to add a relay (why not already, really ?) and downhill to be considered. Same with Golf where a team event is badly needed.

 

  • The Versailles cross-country venue was amazing ! I'd love for the cross country to have its standalone event on top of the evening stuff.

 

  • We need the three events in sports climbing ASAP. A mixed team combined event could work also.

 

  • Boxing needs to stay.

 

  • I'd prefer to have a male and a female double and a mixed team event in table tennis that what we have now. Same in tennis, if the players were up for it, i'd like a mixed team event to remplace the mixed double.

 

  • Kayak "Jeux Sans Frontières" events were ok I guess. I think 6 slalom and 10 sprint events is a nice balance for the sport, not sure, if these cross things are the way to go.

 

  • I'd prefer rowing to keep its "basketball for short people" events than the beach stuff they are planing for LA

 

  • Why Trampoline and not Trumbling, really ?

 

  • I kind of like to see more 'open' events, as in open to both women and men and let the best win regardless of sex. For instance, I'd gladly switch the mixed team event in archery for an open individual event with every archers (male and female) competing against each others.

 

  • Leaving aside the breaking stuff (which was not that terrible really), I have the feeling the "X" stuff is making is way into the olympics (or it might be the other way, not sure)

 

  • We should have an small optional list of sports (not quite the additional sports program we have now) for sports that make sense in some context, but doesn't in others. Sports that can live beeing olympic or not without much fuss. Here, I'm thinking mainly about baseball, cricket and surfing. While Surfing in Tahiti made sense, like it will in Los Angeles and Australia, will it for India 2036 or Germany 2040 ?

 

  • I'd bring back the demonstration sports of the old days for stuff like Lacrosse or Pétanque

 

  • If Taekwondo is in, Karate should be in also. And squash too. These two are my two borderline olympic sports that should be in. In any case, these two sports can't have their olympic status to be challenged every four years, too much depends on it. And so, to answer my first point : we definitely need a three weeks period.
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/
Share on other sites

I don't think any events should be ever removed or changed with other, the programme should stay the same with adding new events. it's weird to be one and only karate or breaking champion just because you were born in the right decade. I'd prefer moving to a longer Olympics or cutting the number of participants to shorten the events but not to deleting them completely

Bring back the 1991 borders

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-669988
Share on other sites

Mountain Bike is my main one, Put the short course event in! Same riders, same course, it's a no brainer. 

Agree about 4x400 Mixed, if its who has the best B team then just keep it at the world Championships.

I don't like the 3 week idea, part of the appeal for me IS that there is too much going to watch everything at the same time, everyone's games experience is different. But i do agree that week 2 seemed slightly emptier than week 1 in Paris. I think the range of sports in Paris was almost perfect, i actually think there is TOO many sports in LA...but t20 cricket should be in, but with 8-12 teams.

Gutted about the Modern Pentathlon changes, even before GB got good at it i enjoyed watching it, I'd rather not see it in the games than see it with a joke event slapped in the middle. I am also 50/50 on boxing, it can stay or go....not to fussed really. 

I get why football is in, but....again you could cut it and i wouldn't care, being a under23 tournament is just weird

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670001
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, George_D said:

Judo TKD, Karate too many asian martial sports

 

Table tennis, Badminton, Squash too many racquet sports

Well, with all of these sport combined, you barely have more events that swimming.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670005
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vovanA said:

I don't think any events should be ever removed or changed with other, the programme should stay the same with adding new events. it's weird to be one and only karate or breaking champion just because you were born in the right decade. I'd prefer moving to a longer Olympics or cutting the number of participants to shorten the events but not to deleting them completely

But it'd be weirder if a sport, once added, can never be removed again just for the sake of not removing it. Number of participants in so many events is already ridiculously small, from a handful of weightlifters and barely half of a regular cycling peloton to eight (!) teams in synchro diving.

 

 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670007
Share on other sites

As always, most of the suggestions I see make me think "wtf, no", but also I'm not creative enough to come up with lots of realistic suggestions myself :p 

 

I would love for football to be kicked out though. It takes up so many spots and especially the junior men's event is just ridiculous (as an Olympic event).

 

As for mountain bike: please no shorttrack, those races are the epitome of 'it must be short and spectacular', resulting in usually nothing happening at all until the last 2 minutes. It's not done on the same course, it's done on a short course (hence the name) of which most of the mountain bike elements have been taken out to increase the speed. Yes to downhill though, absolutely, that would actually add something.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670008
Share on other sites

- I would love for a Mountain Running event in the Mountain Bike course.


- Freestyle 1500m series are long and boring. I would remove the event and change it to a Open Waters short event, even maybe a relay? 4x200 should be a direct final with the best 8 teams.

 

- Mixed duet in Artistic Swimming should be in LA. And also Men's Rhytmic Gymnastics is so needed. Same for Women's Grecorroman. If sports can't have parity can't be in the olympics, that's my take.

 

- I wouldn't be mad if they changed Boxing for Kickboxing.

 

- Cricket and Baseball/Softball should be a 10 team tournament at least, and part of the core programme in the Olympics.

 

- Karate was the most boring event in Tokyo, is good out of the Olympic Programme. If another contact sport is wanted, Wushu is the correct option.

 

- I don't mind each host selecting some events, but to an extent. Maybe just events, and not whole sports? IDK. I live with fear of Brisbane choosing Netball and that weird version of Rugby only them play.

 

- Men's football should be down to 12 teams.

 

- I want that Sailing Off-Shore event they wanted for Paris back. Find a way to work around it, but it sounded amazing.

 

- I'm okay with Ligthweight-Rowing dissapearing. But they shound change it for Coastal Rowing instead.

 

- I want a long distance Canoe/Kayak event.

 

- 4x400 mixed in Athletics doesnt work. I would rather it change for a Medley Distance Relay or something among the lines. Also, Women's 400 Hurdles need higher hurdles, they are to low and it isnt a challenge for athletes anymore. It's just basically 400m 2.0.

 

- Out with Equestrian. It's 2024, no need to put animals through it. And why is the best event (cross country race) not an individual event?

 

 

That's all that I can think about.

 

 

Edited by Jur
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670011
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

But it'd be weirder if a sport, once added, can never be removed again just for the sake of not removing it. Number of participants in so many events is already ridiculously small, from a handful of weightlifters and barely half of a regular cycling peloton to eight (!) teams in synchro diving.

 

 

Eight teams in Synchro diving has been the case since they came in for Sydney so not a victim of recent cuts or anything. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28001-olympic-sports-program-review/#findComment-670012
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Probably 0% but in 1939 Germans reached the outskirts of Warsaw after only eight days (the border was more to the east than it is now i.e. they had less ground to cover). The ugly truth is NATO would most likely bide their time in response so the entire eastern Poland would be a battle field for a while.
    • What was the Italian conflict? I can't quite remember.
    • And is there any chance that the Polish president would have escape within the first 2-3 days of war? Probably 0%. In 1939, the authorities escaped, but after an attack from 2 sides, the first being the German attack.
    • Hmm, and were they wanted to capture Kyiv in three days? Since middle of 2022, their run has been slow, so I don't think they'll be using any rapid maneuvers on the future. They surprised Ukraine at the very beginning on the war and were close to success. Zelenskyy only needed to flee the country in the first 2 or 3 days of the war. And Russia could have counted on this happening, because Zelenskyy wasn't an experienced politician or soldier and could have do however they wanted. In my opinion, Zelensky's role in Putin's plan ruined everything for them- he, as a populist and inexperienced man, was to escape from Kiev in the first few days of the war. Then Russia would have put in one of its own- Yanukovych? and Europe and the USA would probably have approved that.
    • Fortifications could only work for illegal immigrants but not against drones. We're wasting missiles worth millions of euro to shoot down drones worth 10k. It's anyone's guess how quickly Russians would reach Vistula River if the invasion came from two sides (Kaliningrad & Belarus). It would be days and not weeks...
    • Shocking news 😔 We just saw him competing 2 days ago in Annecy. 
    • Yes, and Ukraine is very important to Putin- far more important than the Baltic states, Georgia or even Poland. Without Ukraine, the restoration of the former USSR will be impossible for Putin. Another thing is that with pro-Russian Ukraine, Poland will have its entire eastern and northern border (Kaliningrad) with unfriendly countries except Lithuania, so it will basically have to militaries the all entire eastern part of Poland and build various fortifications there.
    • After all, it's one thing to dislike someone, even to destroy something (if it remains a rumor, which it usually is), and quite another to steal money... In the Italian national team there was the Wierer vs. Vittozzi conflict, in the polish team in Sochi 2014 there were accusations of various strange things: destroying a skies, rifle, etc., but theft is a serious crime, not just some rumors.
    • Stalin got Karelian Peninsula and Viborg and that was enough. Land invasion from Finland made no sense 60 yrs ago and makes even less sense in 2020s.   Finland isn't that important strategically even when it comes to Baltic Sea. U need to control Danish straits to control the Baltic. Warsaw Pact had an invasion plan of Denmark for this one reason.    Likewise Mediterranean Sea was no priority for Stalin. SU wasn't a naval power back in the day.
    • Exactly. It's not just Simon and her theft, there are other issues as well.
×
×
  • Create New...