Men's Cricket ICC World Cup 2023

[Dragon 1,844]

Ryan ten Doeschate

Former Netherlands all-rounder on BBC Test Match Special

 

I am very proud. This is a fantastic moment for Dutch cricket.

It is the Netherlands' best achievement, by far.

[Noorderling29 167]

We’ve beaten South Africa before at a World Cup and haven’t we also defeated England once 

Edited October 17, 2023 by Noorderling29

[Roamingrover86 856]

2 minutes ago, Noorderling29 said:

We’ve beaten South Africa before at a World Cup and haven’t we also defeated England once 

Yes, those were in a different format ( T20) , the one that got approved for LA28 programme. 

[Noorderling29 167]

Thank you for jogging my memory. So indeed our best achievement. There’s dancing in the streets of Amsterdam tonight.

[Fly_like_a_don 1,089]

 Captain talking about reaching semis. That's nice they have to believe in themselves.

 

 Next.  Dutch have to back to beat at least 4 of them. Aussies not doing great this time

 

[heywoodu 15,135]

59 minutes ago, Dragon said:

Netherlands win by 38 runs

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/cricket/66858173

 

Right. A few days ago I thought I got it when I saw a team won by X wickets, but it's won by runs instead of wickets then  

 

I think I'm not really getting it yet  

[phelps 7,669]

game #15,  b. by 38 runs

 

in a match shortened by rain,  scored 245/8 in 43 overs in the 1st inning, meanwhile  were only capable of scoring 207/all out in 42.5 overs in the 2nd inning

 

game details

https://www.cricketworldcup.com/match/102761

 

Standings after gameday #3

https://www.cricketworldcup.com/standings

 

Tomorrow, gameday #4 starts with the matchup between  and  at 10.30 a.m. CET in Chennai

[Thagard 61]

Great result for the Netherlands

 

It makes me forget West Indies are not there.

[Siddhartha Talukdar 234]

Netherlands tail really wagged hard. At the end of 33 overs, Netherlands were 140/6 while South Africa were 147/7

[Siddhartha Talukdar 234]

10 hours ago, heywoodu said:

Right. A few days ago I thought I got it when I saw a team won by X wickets, but it's won by runs instead of wickets then  

 

I think I'm not really getting it yet  

If the team batting first wins, then the team is said to have won by difference of the runs scored by the two teams. For example, team A batting first scores 100 runs and team B scores 70 runs, then team A won by 30 runs.

If the team batting second wins, then the team is said to have won by number of wickets left as the game is stopped the moment team batting second scores more runs irrespective of number of overs remaining. For example, if team A batting second has scored more than team B but lost 6 wickets in the process, then team A won by 4 wickets as 4 more wickets were remaining

Edited October 18, 2023 by Siddhartha Talukdar