website statistics
Jump to content

Proposals for Continental Olympic Qualifications


Recommended Posts

  On 1/20/2020 at 5:32 AM, Olympian1010 said:

Basketball, Baseball, Football, and Volleyball are all popular in both Asia and Oceania. Rugby is hugely popular in Oceania. Handball is quite popular in Western Asia. Artistic Swimming enjoys popularity in East Asia. 

Expand  

It's synchronised swimming, don't play whit fire :spank:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269307
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 5:53 AM, Gianlu33 said:

It's synchronised swimming, don't play whit fire :spank:

Expand  

It's called Artistic Swimming. Over and out.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269314
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 5:53 AM, Gianlu33 said:

It's synchronised swimming, don't play whit fire :spank:

Expand  

A) It’s actually called Artistic Swimming

B) It works better as a name

C) Not everything has to be synchronized

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269316
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 6:51 AM, Olympian1010 said:

A) It’s actually called Artistic Swimming

B) It works better as a name

C) Not everything has to be synchronized

Expand  

It was a different concept, they aren't only words. Thanks god in Italy and Russia it's still "synchronized swimming" and it will never change...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269317
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 5:52 AM, JoshMartini007 said:

Sadly until we create a system where 200+ nations can participate there's always going to be someone missing out. It's unfair to make things easier for Pacific nations by removing Australia/New Zealand while doing nothing to help the small states of Europe or smaller Caribbean nations in Pan America, etc (or by creating a very complicated qualification system that essentially makes the tripartite commission redundant).

 

While a lot of continental quotas do end up going to the big nations from each continent it's still better for the smaller nations than the alternative of not having continental quotas.

Expand  

This is a fair point. Maybe the following would be the best qualification system.

 

Fuck the continental qualification system. Instead, we divide the 206 (though may soon be 207, 208, or 209) NOCs by either 5, 6, or 7. NOCs are put into tiered qualification groups based one three factors: population, athlete density (how many athletes), and competitiveness (you could also add geographical size, and make different groups for each gender). The groups could be the same for every sport, or different from sport to sport. 
 

This seems like the most fair way. Obviously the higher tiers could be given more quotas. Also, we could say that only NOCs in the lowest tier are eligible for universality quotas (and they can only have 1 quota per gender through that method). 

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269318
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 7:01 AM, Olympian1010 said:

This is a fair point. Maybe the following would be the best qualification system.

 

Fuck the continental qualification system. Instead, we divide the 206 (though may soon be 207, 208, or 209) NOCs by either 5, 6, or 7. NOCs are put into tiered qualification groups based one three factors: population, athlete density (how many athletes), and competitiveness (you could also add geographical size, and make different groups for each gender). The groups could be the same for every sport, or different from sport to sport. 
 

This seems like the most fair way. Obviously the higher tiers could be given more quotas. Also, we could say that only NOCs in the lowest tier are eligible for universality quotas (and they can only have 1 quota per gender through that method). 

Expand  

This is amazing if we want kill European sport, a really fair system :)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269319
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 6:55 AM, Gianlu33 said:

It was a different concept, they aren't only words. Thanks god in Italy and Russia it's still "synchronized swimming" and it will never change...

Expand  

How is it different? The artistic component score of the sport is the biggest chunk of the total score. Also, Artistic Swim is so much easier to say.

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269320
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 7:02 AM, Gianlu33 said:

This is amazing if we want kill European sport, a really fair system :)

Expand  

How would this kill European sport?

“Sport has the power to change the world. It has the power to inspire. Sport can create hope where once there was only despair” - Nelson Mandela

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269321
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 7:02 AM, Olympian1010 said:

How would this kill European sport?

Expand  

This system will give less quota to developed sporting country, and this will strongly penalize Europe (and North America). A lot of top athletes will miss the Olympics only becouse some people thinks that small country have the rights to compete in EVERY sport. For me the actually systems is pretty good, they only should reduce the continental quotas. Olympics are for the best athletes, I think that we agree about it.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269324
Share on other sites

  On 1/20/2020 at 7:02 AM, Olympian1010 said:

How is it different? The artistic component score of the sport is the biggest chunk of the total score. Also, Artistic Swim is so much easier to say.

Expand  

It's a bit hard to explain in English for me, I don't know the good translation for the technical words. "Artistic swimming" give more important to the artistic segment and he become more similar to acrobatic gymnastic than the currently form of synchronised swimming (like the highlight routine, how bad it is..)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2235-proposals-for-continental-olympic-qualifications/page/4/#findComment-269326
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • to me, every TT and Diving event is just a free gold for   it's time to cut down the number of those events...and not by only a few
    • until Sport Climbing became part of the Olympic schedule, the "combined event" didn't exist and it was quite an oddity to see the same people being at the top of both boulder and lead, even if boulder was basically invented as a form of (indoor) training for the lead specialists   in the last 10 years, with this "combined event" included in the Olympic program, many things have changed and of course the strongest specialists in both disciplines started to develop also the skills required by "the other one" to be competitive in the new event   actually, also the design of the boulder and lead walls has changed to allow all the top athletes to become better all-arounders than true specialists of a single event   but, despite that, there are still a very good number of those and if you're not Janja Garnbret, it's very difficult to be a medal candidate in both disciplines   most likely, with boulder and lead being now separated also at the Olympics, I hope everything will be back to basics, with boulder and lead walls being way more complicated for the non-specialists, requiring different skills (and physical characteristics) that can't easily match one with the others
    • despite the finals are still running, it's certain that  win gold & silver and  win bronze in the mixed air pistol competition 
    • it's the configuration of the building: there are a lot of outdoor spaces (more than usual), with the wind gusts going left and right, which is very tricky for the shooters (especially those used to different conditions where the scores are normally higher)
    • Serbia was for some reason DSQed and removed from the fifth place in mixed air pistol event
    • Absolutely, there was at first all-around with 3 disciplines, where lead/boulder specialists were favorites, then it was replaced by Lead+Boulder combined, where lead specialists was favorites because of greater gaps that can be achieved in lead climbing, and now these are separate disciplines where it depends only on what each climber could do best (or who is Janja Garnbret who will win 2 golds)
    • It was always going to be difficult for IOC to get new events in & stick to their 10,500  limit. I wish they could have increased it to 12,000 but they did find a way out by limiting the quota to core sports ONLY. I see that as a very positive & well thought out by both LOC & IOC.    I have mixed feelings on these changes but overall can’t complain much as it could have been worse. The good part:    1. Compound Archery will be a great addition to the programme albeit only in mixed team event. Sadly this means losing quotas from Recurve, which will make the qualification process more challenging.    2. TT events : Getting the doubles event is an excellent call plus we have a team event too . The men’s & women’s team events were so predictable. This 3 format will throw up opportunities & surprises . Most importantly it will add to the viewing experience as matches are expected to be tighter & shorter.    3. Basketball 3x3 is a growing sport & increasing the number of teams is certainly the right call. It was expected.    4. Sport climbing : The programme looks complete now & again on expected lines.   The OK part:    1. Boxing : Keeping the total quota places same & increasing a single weight class in women’s event was expected.    2. Additional swimming events : Considering the hosts for the next two olympics are swimming dominant nations. This was expected.    3. Mixed Golf : This is a good idea & will be an intresting event to watch.   The Bad part:    1. Football : if you are so worried about maintaining the quota limit why not just make both events a 12 team one. I can understand the reduction in men’s but increase the women’s team event.    2. Athletics : This change doesn’t make much sense. Perhaps an additional 🥇 for  . Why would you take away a race walking event only to replace it with another track event.    3. Tennis : I don’t like this idea of mixed team , XD was a better format for me.    4. Gymnastics: A mixed team event  will not add anything to the programme. Perhaps again a lot to do with the LOC than FIG or IOC.         
    • Biden was also known to have shower related problems,your point ? could be an old men thing.
    • Traitor is a nice way to describe him, really the only explanation for his actions (because I'm going to naively believe he is not actually dumb) is that he is a foreign agent and not even really hiding it, at all  
    • Not too familiar with this sport, but do the same athletes compete in boulder and lead?
×
×
  • Create New...