website statistics
Jump to content

Athletics IAAF World Championships 2019


Wumo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Col_Frost said:

Looks like this thing that helps hammer throwers but disturbs in discus also disturbs in javelin

 

Hammer is far heavier than discus & javelin, mind you. As they call it in downhill alpine skiing, the weight carries you alone. If the air in Doha is 'stale' because of the humidity (checked on google and it's listed 73% today) so that means the heat is stale in the air so to speak, that's why there's nothing there to carry the discus & javelin. Hammer isn't affected as much because of its weight IMO.

Edited by Monzanator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Przed chwilą, Monzanator napisał:

 

Hammer is far heavier than discus & javelin, mind you. As they call it in downhill alpine skiing, the weight carries you alone. If the air in Doha is 'stale' because of the humidity (checked on google and it's listed 73 degrees today) so that means the heat is stale in the air so to speak, that's why there's nothing there to carry the discus & javelin. Hammer isn't affected as much because of its weight IMO.

That explains poor level of discus and javelin but not better level of hammer ;) 

Edited by Col_Frost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Przed chwilą, dcro napisał:

Poor level in javelin? Looks to me like every other javelin qualifiers to be honest.

Of course it is. Still no Q which is 63,50. Two years ago we had seven, four years ago eight such a results. In both of this 62m didn't give a 'q' and here almost for sure will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Przed chwilą, dcro napisał:

They seriously put women's 200 m and 400 m heats in the same session??

 

I guess that's yet another consequence of that mixed BS...

Maybe or maybe it's just supidity. Remember that last year at ECh finals of Women's 400m and 4x400m was in the same session?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Col_Frost said:

Of course it is. Still no Q which is 63,50. Two years ago we had seven, four years ago eight such a results. In both of this 62m didn't give a 'q' and here almost for sure will.

 

Sub-62 was enough in Rio though. And probably will be the same here when all is concluded.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...