website statistics
Jump to content

[PREDICTION CONTESTS] Discussion Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, dcro said:

 

It doesn't mean that bronze is more important than gold (bronze is still only 2 points). It just means that all three medalists are more important.

 

And this system is too complicated... Maybe something like this would work better

 

Gold - 5 pts

Silver - 4 pts

Bronze - 3 pts

Wrong medal - 1 pt

Only if someone has all three correct medalists, but some are in wrong order, then wrong medal gives 2 pts instead of 1 pt

 

 

So we have this example... There are no more bonus points as such.

 

Results:

1. Martin Fourcade - 5 Points

2. Simon Schempp - 4 Points

3. Anton Shipulin - 3 Points

Your Total: 12 Points

 

1. Martin Fourcade - 5 Points

2. Anton Shipulin - 2 Point

3. Simon Schempp - 2 Point

Your Total: 9 Points

 

1. Martin Fourcade - 5 Points

2. Julian Eberhard - 0 Points

3. Simon Schempp - 1 Point

Your Total: 6 Points

 

1. Martin Fourcade - 5 Points

2. Any Other - 0 Points

3. Julian Eberhard - 0 Point

Bonus Points: - 0 Points

Your Total: 5 Points

Good system, the best i have seen until now, but i think it's much more complicated than mine (which btw is exactly as complicated as the current one)...i mean, i agree with you about the fact that this system would work better, but is there someone here able to write spreadsheets with complete formulas for that? it's a lot more difficult than the current one and it's not possible to compute everything manually, contests would not be managed by anyone.

Edited by Dunadan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...