website statistics
Jump to content

Women's Water Polo Qualification to Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games


vlad
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Dunadan said:

Greece is comparable to South Africa and would lose all matches by 30 without having a chance to advance to quarters? That's news to me - the quality of the tournament is important to someone, Greece instead of South Africa would be a huge step ahead...now one group will be essentially of 4 teams with everyone advancing again.

 

Greece lost all matches against consequential teams during the 2019 World League, 2019 World Championships *AND* 2020 European Championships. So, yes, it would have been a no-contest if 3/4 teams advanced from Trieste.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are talking about a team that got annihilated by everyone at the last World Championship except for the Korea team who started playing water polo just a couple of months before the WCh. It's absolutely ridiculous that they will be at the Olympics. This is like if Africa would get a default quota in the team fencing events, no matter how they perform at the WCh and World Cup events. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

Greece lost all matches against consequential teams during the 2019 World League, 2019 World Championships *AND* 2020 European Championships. So, yes, it would have been a no-contest if 3/4 teams advanced from Trieste.

 

And in same Olympic cycle they got the silver medal at the 2018 ECh. They can beat any of the other 3 teams and I wouldn't be surprised at all if they qualify. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't seem to understand why a relative small global team sport like water polo doesn't have selection criteria? 

 

In water polo they could be like this:

 

Eligibility for Continental Selection and World Qualification Tournament (both men and women):

At least one of the criteria must be fulfilled:

- Qualify for the Super Final in the World League at least once during the Olympic cycle, 2017-2020. (Hosts of the Super Final who don't qualify via the qualification will not have fulfilled the criterion)

- Achieve a top 8 place at one of the two World Championships in the Olympic cycle.

- Achieve a top 4 place at a Continental Championship or Continental Games consisting of at least 8 teams.

- Achieve a top 2 place at a Continental Championship or Continental Games consisting of at least 6 teams.

 

If one of the criteria mentioned above are fulfilled, a nation is eligible for Continental Selection or participation in the World Qualfication Tournament. 

 

The World Qualifcation Tournament consist of at least 12 nations for men and at least 10 nations for women. 

In case the number of participating nations in one or both of the WQT don't reach its target number, one or more of the following scenarios will apply:

- In case 1 spot has to be filled, the combined highest placed non-eligible nation from the two World Championships in the Olympic cycle will recieve an invitation spot. 

- In case 2 or more spots have to be filled then one of the spots will go to the combined highest placed non-eligible nation from the two European Championships in the Olympic cycle. The rest of the spot of will be filled with the highest placed non-eligible nations from the two World Championships in the olympic cycle.

 

To exemplifly with the current qualification:

 

Australia's men's and women's team are eligible for Continental Selection. Let's say they accept it and are qualified for the Olympics

 

Men's WQT:

Achieved one of the criteria:

:CRO Croatia

:GRE Greece

:MNE Montenegro

:GER Germany

:RUS Russia

:CAN Canada (Pan-Am Games)

:BRA Brazil (Pan-Am Games)

:ARG Argentina (Pan-Am Games)

:KAZ Kazakhstan (Asian Games) (Would likely qualify)

:IRI Iran (Asian Games)

:CHN China (Asian Games)

One more Asian nation if the Asian QT consist of at least 8 nations and Japan is not one of the 4 nations in top 4

 

Has not achieved any of the criteria, but receives an invitaton spot if any of the Asian nations above qualifies:

:RSA South Africa (12th place at the 2017 WCH)

 

If one of the nations above rejects its spot, :ROU Romania would receive an invitation 

 

Women's WQT:

Achieved one of the criteria:

:ITA Italy

:HUN Hungary 

:NED Netherlands

:GRE Greece

:BRA Brazil (Pan-Am Games)

:CUB Cuba (Pan-Am Games)

:CHN China (Asian Games) 

:KAZ Kazakhstan (Asian Games)

One of the two nations above are likely to qualify via the Asian QT

It seems the Asian QT will only consist of 6 teams and therefore it's not likely one more Asian nation will be eligible for the WQT

 

Have not achieved any of the criteria, but receive invitaton spots in case one of the Asian nations above qualifies and no new Asian nation becomes eligible:

:NZL New Zealand (Two 12th places at the WCHs)

:RSA South Africa (A 14th and 16th place at the WCHs)

:FRA France (A 11th place at the 2017 WCH and highest placed non-eligible European nation)

 

You may ask, what if more than 12 or 10 nations are eligible for WQT? If that is the case, which is not very likely as long as Oceania and African don't hold Continental Championships, all eligible nations would be allowed to participate in the WQT. 

 

Edited by Wumo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that it's not South Africa's fault that The Netherlands or Hungary did not qualify earlier.

 

But does anyone know what prompted SA to change it's long-standing policy of not accepting the quota for the African continent? Genuinely curious to know

 

I checked last time, there were several times since the women's tournament was introduced in 2000, that 2 teams of the European "Big Six" (ESP, NED, ITA, RUS, GRE, HUN) did not qualify - so exactly this will be not a novelty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, dharang said:

I do agree that it's not South Africa's fault that The Netherlands or Hungary did not qualify earlier.

 

But does anyone know what prompted SA to change it's long-standing policy of not accepting the quota for the African continent? Genuinely curious to know

 

I checked last time, there were several times since the women's tournament was introduced in 2000, that 2 teams of the European "Big Six" (ESP, NED, ITA, RUS, GRE, HUN) did not qualify - so exactly this will be not a novelty.

 

In this tournament there will now be 10 teams (up from 8) so most people assumed it would help European teams. Instead it has helped Canada and South Africa.

 

Obviously we should increase the quota to 12 teams so that the "Big Six" along with Australia/Canada/China/United States are essentially guaranteed to qualify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, JoshMartini007 said:

 

In this tournament there will now be 10 teams (up from 8) so most people assumed it would help European teams. Instead it has helped Canada and South Africa.

 

Obviously we should increase the quota to 12 teams so that the "Big Six" along with Australia/Canada/China/United States are essentially guaranteed to qualify.

 

In this sense, I think the Olympics and the European Championship participant numbers should be "reversed": with 12 teams for the Olympics (same that the number for the men's tournament), and 10 teams for the ECh.
IMO there aren't 12 competitive teams in Europe in the women's field (see the results of some ECh group stage matches), but there are enough internationally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't understand how people expect to have everyone from the big six at the Olympics (even Greece). Just like that.

 

Whatever happened to actually earning your Olympic qualification...? Like I said, even with 10 teams, women's water polo has it easier than most other team sports.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, dcro said:

I just can't understand how people expect to have everyone from the big six at the Olympics (even Greece). Just like that.

 

Whatever happened to actually earning your Olympic qualification...? Like I said, even with 10 teams, women's water polo has it easier than most other team sports.

 

For the most part, they are earning their Olympic qualification, not their fault other nations can't beat them. Though I agree and do wish FINA would force an African and Oceania championship though.

 

Most people have accepted that team sports should have 12 entrants and for good reason. If an event can't muster 12 entrants, should it be part of the Olympics? I don't think so (this goes for all Olympic events). It's not like this event is the only one with a shallow talent pool. It's also helpful that the 10 teams all have a chance for a medal (Canada and China less so) so there is a bit of an unpredictability factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • And even here we lose to France? I really don't know what's the point of organizing the Olympics if you can't make progress in practically any sport. France has the Olympics in 2030 and there they will definitely prepare 100%, just like for Paris. We can't do that. It's obvious that in ski jumping we have no chance of winning medals, but decency dictates that we should at least win here with a France like that.
    • Finally the ski jumping season begins 11 teams in the (real) mixed team competition, no Switzerland.
    • Most of our athletes are constantly bothered by something: the pressure to qualify, the miss of pressure when they have already qualified, etc. It's the same in football: at the beginning of the season they are a poor form becouse of a little played and at the end of the season they are tired. They are always looking for excuses. A real champion always plays at a high level, like Sinner, and doesn`t look for 1000 excuses for his poor performance.
    • Think it is mentally difficult for the two teams with the Olympic place guaranteed and the pressure off, whereas everyone else is absolutely playing at 110%.  I'm sure things will be better once they get to Milan. 
    • There's no point in cheating, these were terrible European Championships for us. Retronaz out of form, Constantini with a huge number of big mistakes. Only illness can excuse it... We've probably lost the last 10 matches with Switzerland... It looks like Constantini had the tournament of her life in mixed doubles in 2022 in Beijing and she will never reach this level again.
    • What good is it to us if we took 4th place and lost an important match? If Constantini was sick, I forgive her, but I'm afraid that the Italian team will not exceed a certain level. Yes, they have made progress since 2022, but they lack that one decisive step to become a class team. Here we lost all important matches with teams at our/higher level: Sui x2, Sco x2, Swe. We only won with the one we were supposed to win with. I don't believe in a medal for this team in Cortina. After 2022, it seemed that Constantini could dominate women's curling, but it didn't happen that way. After Sinner's recent successes, I opened my eyes a bit and started to demand more from our athletes, coaches, and officials. I have no intention of being satisfied with 4th place, because with this approach, you won't achieve anything great.
    • play their best, but only get 1, so  get bronze 6-4!  
    • Oh dear, once again a 50% shot from Constantini when she needed 100%.   blank the end & go into the 10th with the Hammer of Thor.  
    • Very quick end &  get 2 back to 6=3, but  have the hammer in ninth....
×
×
  • Create New...