website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Nordic Combined 2017 - 2018 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

It's the same as with ski jumping - no difference.

 

But, as I said before, winter program has no events so it's completely normal to have multiple almost same events... :whistle:

In ski jumping "no difference" is not entirely correct, there definitely are specialists (although of course not as big of a difference as, say, the slalom vs downhill in alpine skiing). The 'flyers' have a better chance on the large hill, but since there are no 'flyers' in NC, I guess there isn't that much difference indeed. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/628-nordic-combined-2017-2018-discussion-thread/page/3/#findComment-114909
Share on other sites

yes, there's a difference connected to the individual characterstics of the jumpers...

it's the same difference that there is in special ski jumping...

there are athletes who rely mainly on their power at the moment of the jump (who normally are more effective on the small hills) and others who are more sensitive, with a lighter physical build, who normally are more effective on the larger hills (sometimes they are real ski flying specialists, with enormous gap in their performance between smaller and larger hills)...

at the moment, for instance, in the Nordic Combined field we have someone like Pittin, who normally is an awful jumper, who however has a marginal chance to find a decent jump on the small hill, but he doesn't have any chance on the large one...

among the best specialists, we have someone like Riiber, who's a true jumper momentarily competing in the wrong discipline, who obviously has a lot better chances to make the difference on the large hill than on the small one...

a not so good jumper like Klapfer, insisting on "power jumping", instead, has a lot better chances on the small hill...

then, of course, the most important factor in NC (as it is in SJ) remains the wind strenght and direction...if you're unlucky with that, you're out of the top positions always and forever...

but in ideal conditions, there's a difference between the 2 kinds of hills, which can affect many athletes more than normal people might think...

Edited by phelps
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/628-nordic-combined-2017-2018-discussion-thread/page/3/#findComment-114922
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The FIS announced that women's nordic combined would be part of the Nordic Skiing world championships from 2021, which essentially guarantees women's Nordic Combined will be in the Olympics by 2026.

Edited by NearPup
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/628-nordic-combined-2017-2018-discussion-thread/page/3/#findComment-140168
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nate River said:

The FIS announced that women's nordic combined would be part of the Nordic Skiing world championships from 2021, which essentially guarantees women's Nordic Combined will be in the Olympics by 2026.

 

Wow, a decision that actually makes at least a bit of sense :yikes:

 

I was convinced they were gonna add it to the 2022 Olympics without it even having been a 1% established event, but at least 2026 gives it eight years to develop into...something. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/628-nordic-combined-2017-2018-discussion-thread/page/3/#findComment-140171
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, heywoodu said:

 

Wow, a decision that actually makes at least a bit of sense :yikes:

 

I was convinced they were gonna add it to the 2022 Olympics without it even having been a 1% established event, but at least 2026 gives it eight years to develop into...something. 

Oh, no, they are trying to get it in for the 2022 Olympics (and it isn't even the only event making it's debut at the 2021 Worlds that they are trying to get into the 2022 Olympics *cough* parallel slalom *cough*). It's just that since they are adding it to Worlds for 2021 it basically guarantees inclusion in 2026.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/628-nordic-combined-2017-2018-discussion-thread/page/3/#findComment-140183
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...