website statistics
Jump to content

2024 Olympics - Day 8 (August 3)


 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Josh said:

I agree. There’s absolutely no way we’re winning over 28-29 (I believe that was his projection?), unless one or two of Warner/FAA medaled today and the women’s soccer advanced to the medal rounds. 

I said 27-28

It's more an indication that our conversion rate in the first half was probably at the high end... it tends to level out over time, so the second half may not be as kind

That's also assuming my projections are accurate, and not just an exercise in my willingness to be wrong publicly :d
 

Edited by JockCartier
Clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Josh said:

I agree. There’s absolutely no way we’re winning over 28-29 (I believe that was his projection?), unless one or two of Warner/FAA medaled today and the women’s soccer advanced to the medal rounds. 

I was lol-ing at the decimal, not the prediction.

 

Canada now has 15, but really 16 since Sanford has a guaranteed medal. 11-12 more in the second week is not crazy. We will need some 50/50s to step up though. 

 

It'll be fun (or not) to see if we can break our non-boycott records of 24/7. 

Edited by orangeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanford is baked in. Katzberg, Rogers and Mitton are good bets in athletics. Breaking and Vincent/Mackenzie in C2 as well. So that's at least six highly likelies. 

Then we have a lot of toss ups too. 3x3, men's basketball, C1, Arop, 4x100, a couple events in track cycling, etc... and a whole mess of minor threats. If the toss ups convert around 50% and one or two of the minor threats pay off, we're there. 

There will be disappointments too of course, but it tends to average out. 

 

Edited by JockCartier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a 50% chance of facing them anyways, but Mel/Brandie draw Kloth/Nuss in the knockout round :facepalm:

 

I much rather would’ve preferred Duda/AP, who have been struggling this season, but oh well… to be among the best you have to beat the best. 

Edited by Josh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JockCartier said:

Sanford is baked in. Katzberg, Rogers and Mitton are good bets in athletics. Breaking and Vincent/Mackenzie in C2 as well. So that's at least six highly likelies. 

Then we have a lot of toss ups too. 3x3, men's basketball, C1, Arop, 4x100, a couple events in track cycling, etc... and a whole mess of minor threats. If the toss ups convert around 50% and one or two of the minor threats pay off, we're there. 

There will be disappointments too of course, but it tends to average out. 

 

I thought Warner was shoe in for a medal before the pole vault, and then disaster struck so…

 

I’d put C1 with Vincent and Jensen with the same medal odds as the C2 IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Everything is open to everyone. There are no "insiders" and "outsiders". If people from Ireland, for example, don't want to partake in ski-jumping and luge, that is their problem. Why should the countries, that do compete in these sports be blamed, that others don't.    Also, there are 25 out of 35 sports at the SOG, that could be played anytime in the year. By this logic there shouldn't be any "summer" or "winter" OG. You should just call it the February Olympic Games and the July Olympic Games, or Part 1 and Part 2, if they are not going to be distinguished.   It will never cease to a amaze me, how much it bothers people from particular regions, that Winter Olympics exist. If they were called the Winter Sports Games, probably no one will bath an eye, but because it has the word "Olympics", it tears their soul, that there are OG for sports they don't watch, care, like or participate in, even though it's their own fault.     But the sad truth is that in 20 years (or sooner, because glimpses are starting to appear) they would transfer 10 indoor sports, because the Winter Games need to be more "marketable and inclusive" and not because the never ending pure greed for money. 
    • I think this came up before, but for me, any sport should only be in the winter olympics if it doesn’t have summer alternative with the same skillset. Realistically you don’t want any athletes doubling up between winter and summer.
    • Well I’d hope so. Otherwise I’d be unsure of how he’d be able to between the two a couple of weeks after the Olympics 
    • Agreed. Winter sports can include sports played at winter like cross country and cyclocross
    • Had to make it sound dramatic as possible  (just kidding, maybe I should’ve worded it better…)
    • Handball has their World Championships in December/January while men's ice hockey is in May, schedules can be weird
    • Counted it by myself, was hoping that someone out there is compiling something since the FIS probably won't until next season. 
    • The last world curling championship was held in April. The last mixed championship was held in October    But they’re “winter” sports 
    • How much does it cost to row in the Netherlands? You can become a recreational rower at my local club in the UK for £16 per month (£192 pa) which would not seem to exclude all but a "super low number" of people from being able to afford the cost of participation. Indeed there are always people to be seen out on the River Soar rowing for much of the year.   P.S. If you haven't rowed before you can do an eight week training course for £40.
    • The most successful male alpine skiier Ingemar Stenmark today finished only 15cm from a medal at the World Masters Championship in pole vault for men 65+ (3.00m)
×
×
  • Create New...