website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Men's Field Hockey FIH Olympic Games Qualifier 2019


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, dcro said:

That's what you get for having the "fairest" qualification system. :whistle:

 

The fairest qualification system should get the strongest teams at the Olympics, not the most diverse field. So yeah, nothing wrong with it.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255746
Share on other sites

Just now, heywoodu said:

 

The fairest qualification system should get the strongest teams at the Olympics, not the most diverse field. So yeah, nothing wrong with it.

 

Not really. Universality is one of the main Olympic principles. Without it, it becomes much harder for new nations (and regions) to emerge, as it has been proven again and again.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255747
Share on other sites

Just now, dcro said:

 

Not really. Universality is one of the main Olympic principles. Without it, it becomes much harder for new nations (and regions) to emerge, as it has been proven again and again.

Ok, maybe 'nothing wrong' was too much, but I really don't see any systems that are significantly better/more fair. Qualify the best of every continent, let the rest play each other based on rankings that are based on performances, and there you go. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255748
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

Not really. Universality is one of the main Olympic principles. Without it, it becomes much harder for new nations (and regions) to emerge, as it has been proven again and again.

 

universality could be pursuited when there was no limit to participation...

 

now that you have tournaments/races with only 6/8 starters (which is simply a shame, unacceptable), you have to put this concept aside...

 

I'm OK with reserving some spots here and there to not exactly the best in the field only in sports where you have a fair amount of those supposed "best" (teams/athletes), making the competition interesting for all the sports fans (especially the neutral ones)...

 

team sports definitely must not be annoyed by "universality", as they have too few participants at the actual Olympic tournaments...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255753
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, phelps said:

 

universality could be pursuited when there was no limit to participation...

 

now that you have tournaments/races with only 6/8 starters (which is simply a shame, unacceptable), you have to put this concept aside...

 

I'm OK with reserving some spots here and there to not exactly the best in the field only in sports where you have a fair amount of those supposed "best" (teams/athletes), making the competition interesting for all the sports fans (especially the neutral ones)...

 

team sports definitely must not be annoyed by "universality", as they have too few participants at the actual Olympic tournaments...

 

But field hockey has 12 starters per gender?

 

I am not exactly proposing some madness here. I'm just saying that it would have been better for the sport if Malaysia had been given a spot based on AG final. Same goes for Ghana, if South Africa indeed withdraws its women's team. But no... We have to have more European teams instead.

Edited by dcro

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255759
Share on other sites

Just now, dcro said:

 

But field hockey has 12 starters per gender?

 

I am not exactly proposing some madness here. I'm just saying that it would have been better for the sport if Malaysia had been given a spot based on AG final. Same goes for Ghana, if South Africa indeed withdraws its women's team. But no... We have to have more European teams instead.

 

while I could agree for Malaysia (they're good enough top keep up with all the other teams), I definitely not agree for Ghana, as they are not good enough...their games would just be unwatchable blowouts...

 

for this same reason, I like the rule they have in fencing...OK to universality/continental representation in the team events, but only if that continental team is good enough to be in the top 16 of the world overall...

 

all team sports should do the same...also for the Host Nation...

 

that's my point of view...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255761
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

But field hockey has 12 starters per gender?

 

I am not exactly proposing some madness here. I'm just saying that it would have been better for the sport if Malaysia had been given a spot based on AG final. Same goes for Ghana, if South Africa indeed withdraws its women's team. But no... We have to have more European teams instead.

At least something we agree on. If South Africa withdraws, their African quota should go to an African nation.

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255763
Share on other sites

Just now, phelps said:

while I could agree for Malaysia (they're good enough top keep up with all the other teams), I definitely not agree for Ghana, as they are not good enough...their games would just be unwatchable blowouts...

 

And with that any possible development of women's game in Africa stops...


And who will qualify instead...? South Korea. At last year's World Cup they were 12th, with one tied game and three losses. Then at the Asian Games they tied their worst ever result. In the play-offs they lost both games. And despite all of that, they will still go through based on rankings. :yikes: If there ever was a federation who protected established nations beyond belief... :facepalm:

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255764
Share on other sites

If South Africa withdraws, the quota goes to an African nation...provided that they are in the top 20 of the world ranking. 

 

If Ghana (on the women's side) cared about developing this sport, why didn't they even show up at the Hockey Series?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255765
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dcro said:

 

But field hockey has 12 starters per gender?

 

I am not exactly proposing some madness here. I'm just saying that it would have been better for the sport if Malaysia had been given a spot based on AG final. Same goes for Ghana, if South Africa indeed withdraws its women's team. But no... We have to have more European teams instead.

Malaysia didn't get the spot because Japan qualified as Continental Champions, releasing the host quota. Host quota reallocation has to be done in World tournament only. 

 

If South Africa indeed withdraws its women's team, its place will be taken by Korea and not another European team. 

 

Continental distribution of Olympic qualifiers:

Men's: Asia: 2, Europe: 5, Pan-Am: 2, Oceania: 2 and Africa: 1

Women's: Asia: 3 (or 4), Europe: 5, Pan-Am: 1, Oceania: 2 and Africa : 1 (or 0)

 

This is much more diverse than what we see in many other team sports. Except Africa, all other continents have a number of good teams. 

 

Also, I don't think having some sort of restriction regarding runner-up (or if needed even lower placed teams) of continental tournaments, to ensure that we don't have completely one-sided matches. For Rio, similar restriction were placed on Brazil getting host quota. We can argue whether the correct ranking cut-off should have been 20 or 25 or 30 or whatever, but that is just nitpicking. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/2057-mens-field-hockey-fih-olympic-games-qualifier-2019/page/17/#findComment-255768
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • And  Reece Howden out in his first race of the day... yeah that's a excellent start for the Canadians 
    • Moguls WC Ruka    Women Gold-  Jakara Anthony (79.89) Silver-  Olivia Giaccio (78.64) Bronze-  Jaelin Kauf (78.08)   Men Gold-  Matt Graham (81.72) Silver-  Ikuma Horishima (80.50) Bronze-  Julien Viel (79.30)   Full Results
    • Moguls WC Ruka    Women Gold-  Tess Johnson (78.86) Silver-  Perrine Laffont (77.43) Bronze-  Olivia Giaccio (74.35)   Men Gold-  Ikuma Horishima (83.48) Silver-  Walter Wallberg (82.47) Bronze-  Nick Page (79.62)   Full Results
    • BBC Sports Personality of Year shortlist announced   Hannah Hampton (Football) Chloe Kelly (Football) Ellie Kildunne (Rugby) Luke Littler (Darts) Rory McIlroy (Golf) Lando Norris (Motor Racing)   Sports Personality of the Year 2025 nominees: Hampton, Kelly, Kildunne, Littler, McIlroy, Norris - BBC Sport
    • Some of the small nations have competed in the past but usually lost 30-0 to the Aussies
    • Officials persons (include Head) of RLF are still in ban. For example, Vaelbe has spoken even more terrible words but, however, CAS obliged to gave them AIN status. And it's the same situation here - FIL must to implement CAS's decision. But it's not clearly FIL's criterias for AIN status and that too strange
    • For Modern Pentathlon, it's interesting that Africa only gets one continental championship spot, considering how well Egypt does in the event.  (But then again, it's max 2 athletes per NOC per gender.)  Presuming that an Egyptian wins the African CCh, I suppose their performance in the other major competitions will allow the second competitor to come through.
    • Statement from the president of the russian Luge federation (yesterday): "Our team is in Kazakhstan and is preparing to apply for U.S. visas. We are setting an example for our entire country, especially for the younger generation. They see that a difficult path is not a reason to give up. It teaches perseverance. In this perseverance lies our shared strength, our mission to millions of young people for whom sports are a guiding point and a shining star. I believe in our country, in our strong-spirited guys. I sincerely love and respect our president, Vladimir Putin. He is the best president in the world. May God grant him strength and good health."   Do they deserve neutral status?
    • I did not think it would happen again but... I created similar post for Paris - 2024 https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/27489-ain-athletes-qualification-for-paris-2024-olympic-games-and-reallocation-of-quotas-post1-updated-1507/#comments  I was not sure if that reallocations would really happen but the reality was even more serious than the expectations. According to this research 43% of the neutral statuses issued by the IFs were fake AIN  - https://razom22.com/neutrality-research/  And the figures are based on the IOC decisions - not on the evaluations by Ukrainian NOC or sport ministry. Right now the situation is absolutely unclear. As usually )) Some notes: 1. Russians will not reject quotas for 2026 as they did for 2024 in judo and wrestling. 2. AINERP may be more loyal to russians due to the new member - Watanabe. His federation issued AIN status to Melnikova who took part in the primaries of the russian ruling party, had phots with Z and e .t.c. 3. I do not expect a lot of reallocations becaues of the total small number of the rus/blr athletes in qualification events right now. 4. BUT, even with these small numbers we see that FIS allowed to compete several incompliant persons.        Short notes from the IOC statement before Paris - 2024:   1. IOC`s decisions to reject quotas are final. 2. IOC`s decisions to approve quotas are not final - new facts may lead to the rejection of invitation. 3. IOC`s decisions cannot be appealed - NOCs were not invited to the Games, so it is a good will to invite individual athletes... or not   russians Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Adeliia PETROSIAN Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC Figure skating Petr GUMENNIK Men's singles Davide Lewton Brain Confirmed by IOC belorussians     Sports Athlete(s) Discipline Possible Reallocation NOC IOC Decision + IF reallocation if happened Figure skating Viktoriya SAFONOVA Women's singles Stefania Yakovleva Confirmed by IOC  
    • I would say they will not be eligible. But it realy abotut the wording every federation has in its papers. World Aquatics changes their policies several times (especially after Mazepin "solved the issues" persoanlly - as witnessed one russian Olympic champion)   Inoirtnat notes on FIS decisions:   FIS points are frozen for ruissns and belorussians - so the situation is not so complicated for a lot of them. The list of the AIN`s is not final as the list from ISU was. It means that persons mau be not only removed from the list but added as well. I expect russians to try some freestyle applications before the stage in China, for example. FIS has not problems with the deny of visa or entris by the host countries. So they kept the possibility to close the doors for the russians for all the countries as ICF did. No sanctions for this, no removing events from the Olympic qualification list, no host changes,   * * * * * Here is the the relevant extract from FIS papers for Aerials tram event. What do you think?
×
×
  • Create New...