website statistics
Jump to content

Men's Football FIFA World Cup 2018


Henry_Leon
 Share

Recommended Posts

vor 3 Minuten schrieb Agger:

 

Sure, from a sportsmanship point of view, it's not right (but then again, Zanka isn't really great at that), but it's part of the game. But if that's the main reason to be happy about Denmark eliminated, good for you

Yes, if you stop a safe goal, you should get a red card. I am glad that Denmark didn't profit from a flaw in the rules.

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Round of 16

 Croatia - Denmark 1:1 After Extra Time (1:1, 1:1), 3:2 After Penalties   

Goals: 4. Mandžukić 1:1 - 1. M. Jörgensen 0:1

Penalties Shootout:

Badelj Missed 0:0, Kramarić 1:1, Modrić 2:2, Pivarić Missed 2:2, Rakitić 3:2 - Eriksen Missed 0:0, Kjaer 0:1, Krohn-Dehli 1:2, Schöne Missed 2:2, N. Jörgensen Missed 2:2

 

Yellow Cards:  M. Jörgensen.

Officials:  Pitana - Maidana, Belatti (all ARG), 40.851 attendance

 

Croatia:  Subašić - Vrsaljko, Lovren, Vida, Strinić (81. Pivarić) - Rakitić, Brozović (71. Kovačić) - Rebić, Modrić, Perišić (97. Kramarić) - Mandžukić (108. Badelj)

 

Denmark: Schmeichel - Dalsgaard, Kjaer, M. Jörgensen, Knudsen - Christensen (46. Schöne), Delaney (98. Krohn-Dehli), Eriksen - Poulsen, Cornelius (66. N. Jörgensen), Braithwaite (106. Sisto)

 

 
 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OlympicsFan said:

Yes, if you stop a safe goal, you should get a red card. I am glad that Denmark didn't profit from a flaw in the rules.

Well, it may very well not have made any difference whether he got a red or not (again, I personally agree that he should) other than he would surely be missed had we advanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vor 6 Minuten schrieb LDOG:

 

I see your other post, you just disagree with the rule being what it is now. Fair then.

Exactly, i didn't say under what circumstances it should have been a penalty. The rule is stupid and should be different and then it would have been a red card.

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vor 4 Minuten schrieb Agger:

Well, it may very well not have made any difference whether he got a red or not (again, I personally agree that he should) other than he would surely be missed had we advanced.

Didn't he miss a penalty later on? In fact him getting a red card might have been better for you, because then he wouldn't have taken a penalty and his replacement might have scored and you therefore might have advanced to the next round.

Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mihamiha said:

croatia has good road to final.first russia, then probably swiss or england.anything can happen

 

Looking at today's games, I'm beginning to feel that it's anybody's game for that spot in the final. Denmark showed how to neutralise a lot of the danger from Croatia (after the first half hour or so) and I'm sure both Russia and an eventual opponent in the semi watched

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OlympicsFan said:

Didn't he miss a penalty later on? In fact him getting a red card might have been better for you, because then he wouldn't have taken a penalty and his replacement might have scored and you therefore might have advanced to the next round.

 

Nope, it was Mathias "Zanka" Jørgensen. Hej didn't take a penalty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • It's good that Argentina is starting to get back on track economically. Every year, all of our alpine skiing teams train in August in Argentina in Ushuaia: "Fine del Mundo", as it advertises itself.
    • The relation of Trump with Russia and, more specific, with Putin is probably the most controversial (being generous) thing of the presidence of Trump, i dont believe the same but is clearly that China help democrats in that election, both are playing their games.   In Argentina the society is clearly divided, the people who are in the left side of the politics, peronist and kirchnerism are very against the goverment, propably the only genuine "rigth-wing" goverment since the recovery of the democracy in 1983. For me and the most part who are in the rigth wing: libertarians, nacionalist and conservatives, is probably the best goverment we see to this days, he made in his first year with a very few legislators in the congress some big and good changes:   1) In the economical: the inflation is only 3% per month since a more of 15% in the last months of the last year, Argentina has now fiscal, financial and comercial surplus-   2) Our country didnt have fighter planes and the goverment buy 24  American F16  -   3) He chances the electoral sistem for a "single ballot" sistem, we have an obsolete electoral sistem that doesnt change from the 19 century and specially, the peronist use for make fraud.   4) In my personal case, he really update the tax sistem for smal/medium profesionals and traders.......and that save us to pay the 50% of our earnings to the state.   With a big expectations in the goverment, its better than i thinked before.
    • It could be better, or it could be much worse, for example, if the accusations that he has been accepting large amounts of money from Russia since 2017 are confirmed. Now let Harris win, which will end Trump's political career and I hope that in 4 years the Republicans will put up someone more predictable.     btw, how is this controversial president of Argentina doing?
    • More predictable is not always better, for me the goverment of Biden was one of the worst of the History of USA and i cant imagine what can happen with even a worse version like Harris is.   I hope, for the contrary, Trump be elected and "may be" the things changes for the better in the world.
    • I once read that Harris had never been to Europe before 2020, when she became vice president. On the other hand, her foreign policy will be more predictable, because it will be a continuation of Biden's policies. That is why I hope Harris wins, although the bookmakers are betting on Trump.
    • Harris is totally green on foreign policy. It will probably be a policy 100% led by Biden's people. Harris' main campaign emphasis is on abortion and women's rights.
    • So much for "everybody's laughing at us if we elect Harris"
    • My favorite tennis tournaments of the year (wta/atp finals)
    • was also invited to the special edition of the Bolivarian Games and seems like  is not participating.
×
×
  • Create New...