website statistics
Jump to content

Team Ireland - Paris 2024 Qualification Tracker


 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Oldira said:

Shane Ryan and John Shortt seem to be entitled to invitations having achieved the OCT. Any word if they will get to compete?

Presumably yes as Swim Ireland said they would be inclined to accept OCT invites given the high level needed to actually achieve those standards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OlympicIRL said:

Presumably yes as Swim Ireland said they would be inclined to accept OCT invites given the high level needed to actually achieve those standards. 

So Ryan could compete in the 100 free because he got the OCT but not the 50m even though he achieved the OQT. I know there are rules but he’s going to be there anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Oldira said:

So Ryan could compete in the 100 free because he got the OCT but not the 50m even though he achieved the OQT. I know there are rules but he’s going to be there anyway.

It would be utterly bizarre if that turned out to be the case and given Swim Ireland's strange decisions in the past, at this point who knows. But let's see when we get more info about the invited swimmers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Shortt being listed as qualified in 200m backstroke on Wikipedia through OCT, not Shane Ryan in 100m Freestyle though, wonder if this is true 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dodge said:

Irish swimming said yesterday that they haven’t received any invitation for Shortt

Nothing on Conor Ferguson either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t mean to sound harsh on some of the non-Irish posters on these forums but some of them are adamant on certain qualifications and then they’re shocked when it turns out they made a mistake.

 

Swim Ireland have said they’ll accept OCT invitations so let’s see if any happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yeah the system is so convoluted and all national teams including relay teams need to be finalised, and universality quotas allocated and acceoted/rejected before any OCT invites can be officially offered. People probably making educated calculations on OCT invites but might be a but longer before officially confirmed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What have we (Olympic Federation) left to confirm? 
 

The reallocations and the relay squads in Athletics

 

Any OCT invites (may not happen) in swimming

 

The golf team 

 

road cycling team

 

Think everything else is officially confirmed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Gold & Silver for  in the Mixed 10m Air Rifle!
    • Italy will raise it to Jury.   Perini's cellphone was in the bag which was kept in the boat. It was not intentional as per him.
    • Giacomo Perini, who originally won bronze in men’s PR1 single sculls, were found to be using communication equipment during the final and has been excluded from the event (ranked dead last) 
    • And last but not least, American gold for the women.  
    • Incredible drama though, with a huge last 200m charge from ! 
    • Oksana Zubkovska just won her 5th consecutive gold in women's long jump at the age of 41. She's just fenomenal woman, who tried to convince doctors that she is healthy at her junior age. 
    • It might have some advantages, I get that, but it doesn't take away the fact that you simply can't make a remotely fair league standing when teams don't all play each other. There's no way you can compare team A and B on number of points gained when they didn't play the same teams (and/or each other)...
    • I'm as traditional and anti-Super League as anyone you can get, but i'm optimistic about the new format.   For one it's still totally opposite of what the Super League wants to be. We don't have a closed league with 30+ matches in a season and you also depend on the domestic leagues to qualify.    Also, as good as the old group stage format was, the last few years it became very double sided in my view. In the 2000s and early 2010s it was much more interesting, when the teams were more equal in strength and surprises happened. But in the past few years, with all the money involved the gap is widening between the elite 10 teams and the rest.    And we usually got 2-3 really strong groups, where some teams got screwed and then we had 5 rather easy groups, with the big teams there had a cruise to the knockout stage, where after 3 matches it was virtually known what the final standing will be.   Now in the new format, where the knockout bracket is fixed by the positions in the league, there will be intrigue till the end i reckon. Plus with only 1 match between teams, there is a higher chance for a smaller team to upset a bigger one. If you have Man City - Sparta in 2 matches, you definitely know City are winning at minimum 1 of them. But in only 1 round, if they miss to beat Sparta, then lose to team 2 and have another draw with a smaller team, then their position in the table is affected much more serious.   I also really like, that after the league phase, we don't get teams dropping to the lower competitions. I have enough of teams like Barcelona or Man Utd phoning and moaning, when they drop to the Europa League. If you don't make the knockouts you are out, done..   The one thing i definitely don't like about the switch is that they gave 2 of the extra spots again to the top Nations with this bogus "best country coef. in a year" spot. They should have given them to the Q nations. The top 5 leagues have enough teams already. 
×
×
  • Create New...