-
Register/Login on Totallympics!
Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.
Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.
If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.
We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!
Modern Pentathlon Qualification for Summer Olympic Games 2016
-
Who's Online 23 Members, 0 Anonymous, 312 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest Posts around Totallympics
-
.thumb.jpg.642c78ff3a012dc916400e4dffdfd2a5.jpg)
By copravolley · Posted
The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy has to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there. -
By Grassmarket · Posted
Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now. I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though.... -
By Grassmarket · Posted
The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now. -
The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR -
That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time. The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
-
By JockCartier · Posted
I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird -
So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of (probably not) and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games. Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings and one of (most likely) or seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two. Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas: / if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa: Asia: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of (x1?) (x1/2) (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of / , and ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above. Universality: ? is safe with two quotas between it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three. nevermind , -
The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2 Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
-
By JockCartier · Posted
I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada. Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything) -
By clemsonbeav · Posted
Lacrosse: https://worldlacrosse.sport/lacrosse-qualification-set-for-olympic-games-los-angeles-2028/ Official doc: https://worldlacrosse.sport/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/LAC-LA28-Qualification-System.pdf
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now