website statistics
Jump to content

Men's Golf IGF PGA 2021 - 2022 (Sanderson Farms Championship)


frantic13poland
 Share

Recommended Posts

Men's Individual
Final Results
 
USA.gif Sam Burns
-22
 
USA.gif Nick Watney
-21
USA.gif Cameron Young
-21
 
Rank
Athletes
Nation
Result
T4
Hayden Buckley
USA.gif
-20
T4
Andrew Landry
USA.gif
-20
T4
Trey Mullinax
USA.gif
-20
T4
Henrik Norlander
SWE.gif
-20
T8
Si Woo Kim
KOR.gif
-19
T8
Seth Reeves
USA.gif
-19
T8
Sahith Theegala
USA.gif
-19
T11
C.T. Pan
TPE.gif
-18
T11
Cameron Tringale
USA.gif
-18
T11
Harold Varner III
USA.gif
-18
T14
Tyler Duncan
USA.gif
-17
T14
Roger Sloan
CAN.gif
-17
T14
Will Zalatoris
USA.gif
-17
T17
Corey Conners
USA.gif
-16
T17
Grant Hirschman
USA.gif
-16
T17
Nate Lashley
USA.gif
-16
T17
Luke List
USA.gif
-16
T17
Denny McCarthy
USA.gif
-16
T17
William McGirt
USA.gif
-16
T17
Taylor Moore
USA.gif
-16
T17
Brendan Steele
USA.gif
-16
T17
Matthew Wolff
USA.gif
-16
T26
Nick Hardy
USA.gif
-15
T26
Stephan Jaeger
GER.gif
-15
T26
Aaron Wise
USA.gif
-15
T29
Russell Knox
SCO.gif
-14
T29
Adam Long
USA.gif
-14
T31
Sungjae Im
KOR.gif
-13
T31
Mito Pereira
CHI.gif
-13
T31
Alex Smalley
USA.gif
-13
T31
Kevin Streelman
USA.gif
-13
T35
Mackenzie Hughes
CAN.gif
-12
T35
Chris Kirk
USA.gif
-12
T35
Kyle Reifers
USA.gif
-12
T35
Davis Thompson
USA.gif
-12
T39
Paul Barjon
FRA.gif
-11
T39
Dylan Frittelli
RSA.gif
-11
T39
Emiliano Grillo
ARG.gif
-11
T39
Charley Hoffman
USA.gif
-11
T39
Ryan Moore
USA.gif
-11
T39
Taylor Pendrith
CAN.gif
-11
T45
Chesson Hadley
USA.gif
-10
T45
Adam Hadwin
CAN.gif
-10
T45
Lee Hodges
USA.gif
-10
T45
Kurt Kitayama
USA.gif
-10
T45
Eugenio Lopez-Chacarra (a)
ESP.gif
-10
T45
Jimmy Walker
USA.gif
-10
T51
Joe lDahmen
USA.gif
-9
T51
Peter Malnati
USA.gif
-9
T51
Andy Ogletree
USA.gif
-9
T51
Sam Ryder
USA.gif
-9
T51
Michael Thompson
USA.gif
-9
T56
Brice Garnett
USA.gif
-8
T56
Doc Redman
USA.gif
-8
T58
Joseph Bramlett
USA.gif
-7
T58
Doug Ghim
USA.gif
-7
T58
Lucas Glover
USA.gif
-7
T58
Brandon Hagy
USA.gif
-7
T58
Andrew Novak
USA.gif
-7
T63
John Huh
USA.gif
-6
T63
Chad Ramey
USA.gif
-6
T65
Sung Kang
KOR.gif
-5
T65
Vincent Whaley
USA.gif
-5
67
Austin Cook
USA.gif
-4
68
J.J. Spaun
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Sergio Garcia
ESP.gif
-4
CUT
Lanto Griffin
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Scott Gutschewski
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Ben Kohles
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Anirban Lahiri
IND.gif
-4
CUT
Martin Laird
SCO.gif
-4
CUT
Max McGreevy
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Davis Riley
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Patrick Rodgers
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Adam Schenk
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Matthias Schwab
AUT.gif
-4
CUT
Brian Stuard
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Hudson Swafford
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Gary Woodland
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Brandon Wu
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Dylan Wu
USA.gif
-4
CUT
Dawie van der Walt
RSA.gif
-4
CUT
Keegan Bradley
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Joshua Creel
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Quade Cummins
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Bill Haas
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Tyler McCumber
USA.gif
-3
CUT
J.T. Poston
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Rory Sabbatini
SVK.gif
-3
CUT
Curtis Thompson
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Jared Wolfe
USA.gif
-3
CUT
Kramer Hickok
USA.gif
-2
CUT
Tom Hoge
USA.gif
-2
CUT
K.H. Lee
KOR.gif
-2
CUT
Carlos Ortiz
MEX.gif
-2
CUT
Seamus Power
IRL.gif
-2
CUT
Brandt Snedeker
USA.gif
-2
CUT
Brendon Todd
USA.gif
-2
CUT
Ryan Armour
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Bronson Burgoon
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Kevin Chappell
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Lucas Herbert
AUS.gif
-1
CUT
Zach Johnson
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Sebastián Muñoz
COL.gif
-1
CUT
Chez Reavie
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Scott Stallings
USA.gif
-1
CUT
Adam Svensson
CAN.gif
-1
CUT
Kiradech Aphibarnrat
THA.gif
E
CUT
Wyndham Clark
USA.gif
E
CUT
Brian Gay
USA.gif
E
CUT
David Lipsky
USA.gif
E
CUT
Keith Mitchell
USA.gif
E
CUT
Seung-Yul Noh
KOR.gif
E
CUT
Aaron Rai
ENG.gif
E
CUT
Sepp Straka
AUT.gif
E
CUT
Nick Taylor
CAN.gif
E
CUT
Camilo Villegas
COL.gif
E
CUT
John Augenstein
USA.gif
+1
CUT
Michael Gligic
CAN.gif
+1
CUT
Patton Kizzire
USA.gif
+1
CUT
Robert Streb
USA.gif
+1
CUT
Bo Van Pelt
USA.gif
+1
CUT
Cam Davis
AUS.gif
+2
CUT
Scott Piercy
USA.gif
+2
CUT
Greg Sonnier
USA.gif
+2
CUT
Callum Tarren
ENG.gif
+2
CUT
Martin Trainer
USA.gif
+2
CUT
Cohen Trolio (a)
USA.gif
+2
CUT
Kevin Tway
USA.gif
+2
CUT
Matt Wallace
ENG.gif
+2
CUT
Jonas Blixt
SWE.gif
+3
CUT
Brett Drewitt
AUS.gif
+3
CUT
Cody Gribble
USA.gif
+3
CUT
Greyson Sigg
USA.gif
+3
CUT
Matthew NeSmith
USA.gif
+4
CUT
Andrew Putnam
USA.gif
+4
CUT
David Skinns
ENG.gif
+4
CUT
Kelly Kraft
USA.gif
+6
CUT
Sam Saunders
USA.gif
+9
CUT
Richy Werenski
USA.gif
+10
CUT
Kevin Stadler
USA.gif
+17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Sadly that won't have Liliana Lewińska reinstated for the Olympics (she was the one robbed at the expense of the Russian representing ).   Nothing to see here anyway. Gymnastics is one of the last sports where you have judges openly manipulating the results and nobody really cares. Trikomiti should be banned for life but yeah, let's move on.
    • I'd love to, but logistically it is going to be such a difficult thing     They somehow put 'the most geographically widespread Olympics ever!' as a positive marketing thing, but it's just really annoying for fans....we're going to look for an accomodation between Tesero and Antholz (I'd say around Bolzano or one of those lovely towns around it) and the ice hockey is like 3+ hours drive away..   Maybe for France 2030, but for Cortina I hope my priority in terms of what to watch is rather obvious  
    • I can pretty much agree with your predictions, no idea where they got their numbers from.
    • Can someone confirm they are not dropping the men's and women's 4 x 400 relays from the athletics programme? One of the sources I follow say only the mixed 4 x 400 will be held but I'm not convinced that's true
    • I think I foun I think I found an answer on a skiing forum   "This (obviously) isn't a technological question, it's a philosophical question. Anybody with the skills necessary to time a ski race to 0.01 would most certainly be capable of timing one to 0.001 or 0.0001, if the greater resolution was what the rules called for. "Here's the reason. "The FIS Timing Working Group has been trying to get rid of mechanical start gates since the 80's. They maintain until that happens, the random mechanical slop inherent in mechanical switches and the random flex inherent in start wands makes timing to .001 simply a random draw. And they've proved it. Repeatedly. "The FIS TWG made their decision based on data collected by my technical group at FIS World Cup and the World Alpine Chmps in the 90's (as TAG Heuer) and then revisited based on data we collected in the 00's (as Rolex). We installed several sets of cells downhill of the start gate (on the start ramp) at 1m intervals and collected data for both men and women across all the disciplines. Analysis of the data clearly showed that mechanical start gates are, to a relevant resolution, random number generators. "This is a question much like the one brought up at the summer Olympics in Munich in 1972. A few months before the Olympics, FINA announced they'd obtained the technology to time swimming to .001, and would start at The Games. FINA were subsequently contacted by the engineering firm who'd designed and supervised construction of the pool in Germany. Representatives from the firm sent FINA a mathematical proof showing that at speeds typical for Olympic swimmers, the pool wasn't built to sufficient tolerances to where all lanes were of equal length to a degree where .001 would be fair. And notice...to this day...swimming also still publishes results only to 0.01. FINA have shelved the idea of 0.001 for over 40 years because no mechanical engineer will certify a pool with walls and touchpad mounts so precisely built that 0.001 would be consistent and fair across all lanes. "Think about it from an engineering standpoint.....let's say you had a time base accurate to 0.0000001 and photocells only accurate to 1.0 seconds. Sure, you could publish results to 0.000001, but anything beyond a full second would be random and therefore useless. "Mechanical start gates are an anachronism, but the TWG has to date been unable to get rid of them. It's a tradition FIS hasn't been willing to part with. Until that happens, publishing results to resolutions beyond 0.01 simply isn't fair because it's not accurate. It's proven to be random. "On another note, at the 1999 World Alpine Chmps at Beaver Creek, where we (TAG Heuer) were official timing, there was a tie for first in the mens SG between Kjus and Maier. Naturally we had the tapes, so for fun we calculated who won without truncation. Of course we kept that tidbit of information to ourselves. Later that night, persons unknown (still unknown to this day) broke into the timing bldg at Birds of Prey and stole the tapes. The next day, the "real winner" was published in a bunch of newspapers in Europe, along with photos of the stolen tapes." "Yes, start gates are a technological mess. Not to mention there is no consistency, nor any flex standard, nor any thermocompensation standard, from wand to wand. So if you were to replace a wand mid-race, which most of us have done, you could be unknowingly changing your race results significantly. Certainly enough to break or make ties. "In the 90's, TAG Heuer had some very expensive experimental carbon fiber wands manufactured for World Cup because, in theory, carbon wands would be way stronger and hopefully more consistent than the fiberglass wands we were using at the time. This particular batch of wands was built by a Formula One supplier to a very tight tolerance, so they were supposedly very consistent and came with lab test data. The carbon wands worked great until we tried them at World Cup in Lake Louise @ -37C, whereupon they shattered like icicles every 5 racers or so. Working as an arm of TAG Heuer with factory support was a lot of fun back then because the big cheeses at the time, Jean Campiche and Ted Savage, were very interested in advancing the level of engineering, so we could get budgets to design and build new widgets and try new technologies from time to time. Some of the ideas worked, some of them didn't. "Having our tapes stolen at the WASC wasn't a catastrophe, but it was certainly amusing. They're not a secret. Any athlete or coach has the right to examine race tapes and do their own math, which is one of the successes of the TWG. It may seem like a big pain in the tush for timing geeks to fill out timing forms and submit their forms & tapes to the Chief of Timing, and I've certainly heard a ton of complaints about it. But in an era where there is extensive betting on ski racing and a lot of corruption & conflict of interest in the sports headlines, transparency is important. "I have no better idea than you as to whether wands will ever be replaced with photocells. I'm not on the TWG and I'm an engineer, not a politician. It's a FIS decision, a phrase which makes us all cringe. As a practical engineering matter, it's a no-brainer. Keep an unplugged start gate on the start post for TV and start the race with a photocell mounted 1m down the hill. Duh." "This (obviously) isn't a technological question, it's a philosophical question. Anybody with the skills necessary to time a ski race to 0.01 would most certainly be capable of timing one to 0.001 or 0.0001, if the greater resolution was what the rules called for. "Here's the reason. "The FIS Timing Working Group has been trying to get rid of mechanical start gates since the 80's. They maintain until that happens, the random mechanical slop inherent in mechanical switches and the random flex inherent in start wands makes timing to .001 simply a random draw. And they've proved it. Repeatedly. "The FIS TWG made their decision based on data collected by my technical group at FIS World Cup and the World Alpine Chmps in the 90's (as TAG Heuer) and then revisited based on data we collected in the 00's (as Rolex). We installed several sets of cells downhill of the start gate (on the start ramp) at 1m intervals and collected data for both men and women across all the disciplines. Analysis of the data clearly showed that mechanical start gates are, to a relevant resolution, random number generators. "This is a question much like the one brought up at the summer Olympics in Munich in 1972. A few months before the Olympics, FINA announced they'd obtained the technology to time swimming to .001, and would start at The Games. FINA were subsequently contacted by the engineering firm who'd designed and supervised construction of the pool in Germany. Representatives from the firm sent FINA a mathematical proof showing that at speeds typical for Olympic swimmers, the pool wasn't built to sufficient tolerances to where all lanes were of equal length to a degree where .001 would be fair. And notice...to this day...swimming also still publishes results only to 0.01. FINA have shelved the idea of 0.001 for over 40 years because no mechanical engineer will certify a pool with walls and touchpad mounts so precisely built that 0.001 would be consistent and fair across all lanes. "Think about it from an engineering standpoint.....let's say you had a time base accurate to 0.0000001 and photocells only accurate to 1.0 seconds. Sure, you could publish results to 0.000001, but anything beyond a full second would be random and therefore useless. "Mechanical start gates are an anachronism, but the TWG has to date been unable to get rid of them. It's a tradition FIS hasn't been willing to part with. Until that happens, publishing results to resolutions beyond 0.01 simply isn't fair because it's not accurate. It's proven to be random. "On another note, at the 1999 World Alpine Chmps at Beaver Creek, where we (TAG Heuer) were official timing, there was a tie for first in the mens SG between Kjus and Maier. Naturally we had the tapes, so for fun we calculated who won without truncation. Of course we kept that tidbit of information to ourselves. Later that night, persons unknown (still unknown to this day) broke into the timing bldg at Birds of Prey and stole the tapes. The next day, the "real winner" was published in a bunch of newspapers in Europe, along with photos of the stolen tapes." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Yes, start gates are a technological mess. Not to mention there is no consistency, nor any flex standard, nor any thermocompensation standard, from wand to wand. So if you were to replace a wand mid-race, which most of us have done, you could be unknowingly changing your race results significantly. Certainly enough to break or make ties. "In the 90's, TAG Heuer had some very expensive experimental carbon fiber wands manufactured for World Cup because, in theory, carbon wands would be way stronger and hopefully more consistent than the fiberglass wands we were using at the time. This particular batch of wands was built by a Formula One supplier to a very tight tolerance, so they were supposedly very consistent and came with lab test data. The carbon wands worked great until we tried them at World Cup in Lake Louise @ -37C, whereupon they shattered like icicles every 5 racers or so. Working as an arm of TAG Heuer with factory support was a lot of fun back then because the big cheeses at the time, Jean Campiche and Ted Savage, were very interested in advancing the level of engineering, so we could get budgets to design and build new widgets and try new technologies from time to time. Some of the ideas worked, some of them didn't. "Having our tapes stolen at the WASC wasn't a catastrophe, but it was certainly amusing. They're not a secret. Any athlete or coach has the right to examine race tapes and do their own math, which is one of the successes of the TWG. It may seem like a big pain in the tush for timing geeks to fill out timing forms and submit their forms & tapes to the Chief of Timing, and I've certainly heard a ton of complaints about it. But in an era where there is extensive betting on ski racing and a lot of corruption & conflict of interest in the sports headlines, transparency is important. "I have no better idea than you as to whether wands will ever be replaced with photocells. I'm not on the TWG and I'm an engineer, not a politician. It's a FIS decision, a phrase which makes us all cringe. As a practical engineering matter, it's a no-brainer. Keep an unplugged start gate on the start post for TV and start the race with a photocell mounted 1m down the hill. Duh."   "So there you have it, no point in going to higher accuracy results reporting, the mechanical start gate assembly makes it pointless."  
    • yes, it is, but FIS doesn't want to go that deep
    • Probably a casualty of reduced athlete numbers because they're not building an athlete's village.
    • These Swedish Champs are on non-geoblocked FTA if you want to watch them, although mixed up with lots of other sports like old traditional Swedish winter classics dating to the age of Gustavus Vasa like 10-pin bowling and E-Sports.     SM-veckan | SVT Play
×
×
  • Create New...