Jump to content

Welcome to Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to other members, get your own private messenger, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Login | Create an Account


Gigs

Senior Member
  • Content Count

    235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Gigs last won the day on March 7 2018

Gigs had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

65 has a spectacular aura about

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Date of Birth
    04/09/98
  • Nation
    Austria
  • Favourite Olympic Games
    Winter Olympic Games
  • Favourite Sports
    Alpine Skiing
  • Favourite Athletes
    Marcel Hirscher
  • Real Name
    Sebastian
  • Living City
    Vienna
  • Job
    student

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    I was rooting for Hirscher but you really can't feel overly bad about Kristofferson winning after all the close calls for him.
  2. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    These champs have been one big catastrophe. Wind in Are, okay you expect that, fog in Are, too bad but that happens, but now even the slopes are crap because of high temperatures...in freakin Are. If there was one thing you could always count on in Are it was good slopes but now even that isn't the case.
  3. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Race is about to start and it isn't shortened
  4. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    I agree, Hirscher overall is dominant but it always seems like he is on the absolute limit while Shiffrin usually looks completley at ease. Also, Hirscher has completely dominant races more rarely than Shiffrin and gets beaten quite a bit more often (I'm talking about Slalom here, things are different in gs) and at the same time if Hirscher gets beaten in the first run the 2nd is almost always a huge spectacle and you just gotta love that. Aside from Hirscher and Shiffrin the thing which to me is actually much more important is that currently the depth in men's slalom skiing is enormous. I mean, which female skiers can realistically win a medal? Shiffrin, Vlhova, Holdener, Hansdotter, Swenn Larsson, Liensberger, maybe Schild. It often feels like even if the skiers I didn't mention have a dream run, they are gonna get beaten anyway because the ones I listed are simply so much better skiers. On the men's side I don't have that feeling. The likelihood of a Croatian winning a medal isn't high but I wouldn't completely rule it out that one of them has a dream run and has his big breakthrough. It's just that this is the case for pretty much everyone in the top 30 who hasn't had his breakthrough already. Everyone is capable of beating everyone and that's really exciting.
  5. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    No way he is gonna continue that long though. He was already close to quitting last year and if I had to bet I'd actually put my money on him retiring after this season What I'd really like was him giving it a proper go at super-gs but that's not gonna happen unfortunately.
  6. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    The performances weren't actually that bad, after all they got two 4th places. It's just that the speed specialists all weren't able to convert the great shape they have had all season into medals. In the gs we were never gonna win a medal with Brunner injured and in the Slalom we will see. The slope really doesn't suit Schild, Gallhuber is injured so really that leaves us with Liensberger as the only realiatic medal contender and tbf that's not a very promising prospect
  7. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Oh boy does this taste sweet
  8. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Well, this didn't age well
  9. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    First run of the ladies gs shortened due to bad weather. How man's shortened races have we had so far?
  10. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    This gets even weirder when you click on the video and realize you've been in the hotel where the video was filmed
  11. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Yeah, but that wasn't really something to be proud of. Both slovakian women were completely dominated by their opponents but both slovenian men crashed which means slovakia won automatically
  12. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Yay the stupid team ranking that ranks the swedes as number 7 leads to one of the best teams failing in the quarterfinal again. All hail the team event, don't listen to them who claim it needs changes
  13. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    It's just funny who dries Van den broecke is genuinly one of the best parallel slalom skiers in the world. He is the guy who beat Hirscher at the team event two years ago and now he was dominating yule until his mistake
  14. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Lol slovenia. What a performance by slovakia to get to the next round
  15. Gigs

    Alpine Skiing FIS World Championships 2019

    Little (or actually not so little) rant about some developments in alpine skiing incoming: I always really liked the alpine combined as I think it's dramatic in a very unique way. Like people always complained the combined isn't thrilling enough because in the slalom run there are lots of riders without a chance to win between the favorites but really in Slaloms or GS' there isn't a skier with a chance to win before the top 10 or even 5 of the first run start, yet I don't hear anyone wanting to cut the 2nd run to 10 skiers. Moreover it was absolutely unique that bib 1, bib 10 bib 20 and bib 30 of the slalom all could be among the favorites. A slalom doesn't have a 2nd run where the favorites are spread over the whole starting list, a combined usually does. So in other words, I like this event and I don't want it to die, but if every combined is like todays I'd have a hard time arguing for its existance. I'd say a combined in Are will always favor slalom skiers as the downhill slope there will never generate huge time gaps as it's generally on the easier side, but with it being extremely shortened plus the slalom slope being in a pretty bad condition this race was a joke before it even started. Now unfortunately the success of the combined is always meassured on how good the race at the last world championship or olympics was and as we haven't had a combined at a major event without either a drastically shortened downhill or a slope in an appaling condition since 2014 every single of these combineds was more or less a joke. Now if we look at 2014 and the events prior to that you'll see that the big advantage for slalom specialists everyone talks about now was basically nonexistent. Sandro Viletta despite being a surprise champion surely wasn't a slalom specialist, Ligety in 2013 was a very good slalom skier but he was already 6th after the downhill, in 2011 and 2009 Svindal won, in 2010 Miller, who back then was basically a speed specialist and in 2007 the combined was won by Daniel Albrecht who was a true allrounder. Combineds don't favor the slalom guys by nature. In a different world this championship takes place on a slope where Schwarz, Pinturault and Hadalin lose 3 seconds to Paris instead of 1 and the slalom slope is in great condition and all of a sudden you would get a race dominated by downhillers. The problem is, that wouldn't really be any better. You probably had less complaining about the event if combineds wouldn't always favor the same guys but in a race where everyone is either a slalom specialist or a downhill specialist you are always gonna favor someone. What really made this event off balanced is the lack of allrounders who can beat anyone anyway. Sure there have been specialists being competitive in the combined in the past as well but I'm certain Svindal used to be a much better slalom skier than any downhiller from this year. (I'll never forget that he secured his first overall world cup win by getting 15th in the final slalom of the 2007 season, something that seems completely impossible now) But even when there weren't many allrounders there always were a few. A guy like Natko Zrnsic Dim who was neither a good downhiller nor a good slalom skier got 4 world cup podiums in combineds plus a world championship medal. You can be a true combined specialist, but problematically nobody aims for that if there are only one or two combineds per season. Why should someone like say, Christof Innerhofer add Slalom to his training program if that discipline is relevant for him twice in the whole year. It's just way smarter to concentrate on what you are already good at and that is what gets you Hirscher with 2 or 3 downhill training days a year as an alpine combined world and olympic champion. Besides the fact that the lack of combineds makes the event less and less competitive I also think the combined should be crucial in the battle for overally world cups. And looking back it actually was. If Benjamin Raich's combined shape hadn't declined as much as it did after 2006 he probably would have won 3 or 4 overall world cups, instead he won one. Of course overall world cup battles were very different before the Hirscher era (it was seen as almost impossible to win the overall world cup with two disciplines only, nowadays there isn't even a single skier who is competitive in 3) but I think if anything this should have led to an increase in combineds not a decrease. Little cycling analogy, if a pure climber dominates the tour de frances despite time trials, the tour de france organizers won't say "okay time trials are useless now, let's drop them altogether", they will increase time trial kilometers so the dominant climber gets beatable. Hirscher in the shape he has now probably would be unbeatable anyway but there will be an era after Hirscher. You could argue that Hirscher's dominance effectively made allrounders useless and you might be right, but what the fis is doing by killing the combined is making sure allrounders don't come back once Hirscher retires or declines. It's easy to forget a bit over 1000 points used to be enough to be in the battle for the overall world cup an in such a battle, let's say, 5 combineds can have a huge impact. I should probably stop writing now as this post is already so long that nobody will read it anyway (right?) but this is just driving me crazy. I really want a return of the times when there were proper allrounders winning overall world cups, downhillers won gs' (little side fact I just noticed, between 2003 and 2009 there were 4 gs world champions who all won at least 3 downhills and a combined number of 40 downhills) and technicans were competitive in super-g's. But to me it feels like the fis is constantly making the wrong responds to changes in the sport.
×