website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

India National Thread


gvaisakh
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/

Recommended Posts

#‎Athletics‬
interstate day 1
W hammer throw - sarita prakash 61.19m (rio-71.00m)
W Shot put - Manpreet Kaur 16.78 m (rio - 17.75m)
W Long Jump - Neena v - 6.45m (rio - 6.70 m)
package of the day - Neena V with an impressive jump of 6.45m in long jump betters mayookha johny's SB of 6.43 at Interstate

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26897
Share on other sites

Sanjeev rajput calibre in 50 metre rifle 3 position is anytime better than other indians in that category....unfortunately he had to forfeit his quota...Big slap to those who didnt consider him for rio

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26911
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, shrikant said:

Sanjeev rajput calibre in 50 metre rifle 3 position is anytime better than other indians in that category....unfortunately he had to forfeit his quota...Big slap to those who didnt consider him for rio

With due respect, Chain Singh has been in much better form in the past 2 years while Gagan is a legend who is in good form as well. So, sadly if Sanjeev Rajput was selected it would have meant 1) Either Gagan Narang or Chain Singh, who are in decent form would have missed out on atleast one event 50x3 or 50 prone (or Rio if Sanjeev was selected to start in both) and 2) Young and talented Kynan Chenai would not have been able to get the exchange quota. So, leaving Sanjeev out of Rio bound team was a tough decision but it was also the correct decision. 

 

We need to stop analysing decisions based on events that happened after the decision was made. Nobody knew Rajput would win silver here, nobody knew Pooja Ghatkar would perform so well. Based on the information NRAI (and we) had at the time of selection, I think NRAI did a perfect job of team selection. 

Edited by Dolby
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26913
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, shrikant said:

Sanjeev rajput calibre in 50 metre rifle 3 position is anytime better than other indians in that category....unfortunately he had to forfeit his quota...Big slap to those who didnt consider him for rio

bro he won medal after amost 5 year later ..last he won in 2011 ..and gagn and chain doing battr then hm ...so there is no point of selecting him ....and exchange quota holder kunan won gold in worldcup this year ..so it is much bttr decision

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26917
Share on other sites

Indian men's 4x400 has slipped a place to 21st after Venezuela improve their timing. It still needs modest 3:04.15 to get 16th.
India Women 4*100 has also slip to 21 place after Venezuela improve their timing. It still needs modest 43:03 to get 16th.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26923
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vivek said:

Any news?

Women's Shot Put ( OG 17.75 m )

 

Manpreet Kaur ( Punjab ) - 16 .78 m

 

Navjeet Kaur ( Punjab ) - 15. 36 m

 

Sonal Goyal ( Delhi ) - 13.43 m

 

Uma P.S. ( Karnataka ) - 13.19 m

 

Rakhi ( Haryana ) - 12. 53 m

 

T. Anisha Kala ( Andaman and Nicobar ) - 6 .09 m

 

Manpreet Kaur ( Punjab ) - DNS

 

 

Women's Hammer Throw ( OG 71.00 m )

 

Sarita Prakash S. ( Uttar Pradesh ) - 61 . 19 m

 

Reena ( Haryana ) - 54 .23 m

 

Athira Muralidha ( Kerala ) - 48 . 52 m

 

Srinithi ( Tamil Nadu )  - 45 . 37 m

 

Harshitha W.R. ( Karnataka ) - 38 .58 m

 

Vijaya Lakshmi ( Tamil Nadu ) - 37 . 67 m

 

Tukfi Khan ( Gujarat ) - 36. 77 m

 

Deepa Joshy ( Kerala ) - 36.71 m

 

Women's Long Jump ( OG 6.70 m )

 

Neena V ( Kerala ) - 6.45 m

 

Prajusha M.A. ( Kerala ) - 6.29 m

 

Shradhha Ghule ( Maharashtra ) - 5.98 m

 

Priyanka Kerketa ( Jharkhand ) - 5.96 m

 

Karthika ( Tamil Nadu ) - 5.89 m

 

Soma Karmakar ( West Bengal ) - 5. 62 m

 

Uma Maheswari ( Tamil Nadu ) - 5.51 m

 

Rubi Gogoi ( Assam ) - 5 . 25 m

 

B. Bhavani Yadav ( Andhra Pradesh ) - 5 . 17 m

 

S. Sujatha ( Telangana ) - 5. 15 m

 

S. Radhika ( Andhra Pradesh ) - 5 . 12 m

 

Asmita Dhaware ( Maharashtra ) - 5 . 01 m

 

Narmita Katoch ( Jammu  & Kashmir ) - 4.45 m

 

Tanju Mondal ( Andaman & Nicobar ) - 4.06 m

 

Sashita Bhengra ( Andaman & Nicobar ) - 4.00 m

 

Women's 10,000 m ( OG 32:15.00 )

 

L. Suriya 33:27.01

 

Men's 5000 m ( OG13:25.00 )

 

Lakshmanan 14:06.04

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26928
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tirtha22 said:

Women's Shot Put ( OG 17.75 m )

 

Manpreet Kaur ( Punjab ) - 16 .78 m

 

Navjeet Kaur ( Punjab ) - 15. 36 m

 

Sonal Goyal ( Delhi ) - 13.43 m

 

Uma P.S. ( Karnataka ) - 13.19 m

 

Rakhi ( Haryana ) - 12. 53 m

 

T. Anisha Kala ( Andaman and Nicobar ) - 6 .09 m

 

Manpreet Kaur ( Punjab ) - DNS

 

 

Women's Hammer Throw ( OG 71.00 m )

 

Sarita Prakash S. ( Uttar Pradesh ) - 61 . 19 m

 

Reena ( Haryana ) - 54 .23 m

 

Athira Muralidha ( Kerala ) - 48 . 52 m

 

Srinithi ( Tamil Nadu )  - 45 . 37 m

 

Harshitha W.R. ( Karnataka ) - 38 .58 m

 

Vijaya Lakshmi ( Tamil Nadu ) - 37 . 67 m

 

Tukfi Khan ( Gujarat ) - 36. 77 m

 

Deepa Joshy ( Kerala ) - 36.71 m

 

Women's Long Jump ( OG 6.70 m )

 

Neena V ( Kerala ) - 6.45 m

 

Prajusha M.A. ( Kerala ) - 6.29 m

 

Shradhha Ghule ( Maharashtra ) - 5.98 m

 

Priyanka Kerketa ( Jharkhand ) - 5.96 m

 

Karthika ( Tamil Nadu ) - 5.89 m

 

Soma Karmakar ( West Bengal ) - 5. 62 m

 

Uma Maheswari ( Tamil Nadu ) - 5.51 m

 

Rubi Gogoi ( Assam ) - 5 . 25 m

 

B. Bhavani Yadav ( Andhra Pradesh ) - 5 . 17 m

 

S. Sujatha ( Telangana ) - 5. 15 m

 

S. Radhika ( Andhra Pradesh ) - 5 . 12 m

 

Asmita Dhaware ( Maharashtra ) - 5 . 01 m

 

Narmita Katoch ( Jammu  & Kashmir ) - 4.45 m

 

Tanju Mondal ( Andaman & Nicobar ) - 4.06 m

 

Sashita Bhengra ( Andaman & Nicobar ) - 4.00 m

 

Women's 10,000 m ( OG 32:15.00 )

 

L. Suriya 33:27.01

 

Men's 5000 m ( OG13:25.00 )

 

Lakshmanan 14:06.04

 

 

already posted by me :p

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26929
Share on other sites

Tomorrow at the inter state 

 

Mens discus - No chance of an olymnpic quota but can Kirpal  hit the 60 meter mark 

Mens triple - Both arpinder and Renjith - so hope for something big 

Mens 100 - I( do not see amiya mallick only Najeeb quereshi so no big chance apparently 

Mens shot - Om prakash and tejinder pal toor 

mens 800m - Jinson Johnson and sajeesh 

 

no big event apparantly except for the Mens triple and Mens shot from the possible olympic qualification perspective 

 

Edited by nitinsanker

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/271/#findComment-26933
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • When it comes to power, confidence and match-winning ability, women's cricket has produced some truly fearless batsmen over the years. These players didn't just score runs - they changed games, calmed crowds and intimidated bowlers. Based on influence, consistency and ability to dominate attacks, here is my 2026 Forum list of the top 7 most dangerous women batsmen in cricket history.   At the top, Meg Lanning stands out for her quiet aggression and leadership. She could control an innings and then suddenly explode. Behind her is Harmanpreet Kaur, known for her raw power and clutch performances, especially in big tournaments.   Ellyse Perry deserves a special mention. Her technique, fitness and ability to increase pace make her lethal in all formats. Smriti Mandhana brings purpose with grandeur - once she gets going, bowlers struggle to find answers.   From a bygone era, Mithali Raj may not have looked aggressive, but her mental strength and ability to bat for long periods make her extremely dangerous. Suzy Bats has become a nightmare for bowlers in ODIs and T20s, as she mixes timing and smart shot selection. The list also includes Deandra Dottin, whose power-hitting can change a match in just a few overs.   What connects all these stars is their fearless mentality. Each has earned the tag of Dangerous Women's Batsman by performing consistently under pressure and against the best bowlers in the world. For fans who love in-depth cricket discussions, statistics and trending topics, Cricbites is becoming a popular platform to explore women's cricket in a fresh and engaging way.
    • Someone made this Statue Trump---Epstein     mysterious bronze statue called “Best Friends Forever” has popped up on the east end of the National Mall in Washington, DC,    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/24/us/politics/trump-epstein-statue-dc-national-mall.html    
    • Off to Milan for the 145th session of the International Olympic Committee. Although the agenda has not been published yet, there shouldn’t be any major items over these two days, apart from the election of a member of the IOC Executive Board. This will be the eighth time the session is held in Italy, the last one being during the Turin 2006 Olympic Games.
    • another wave of mega rain is coming in north Africa 
    • What is happening in Canada , people leave it  They say life is very expensive , you cant find an appartement , the salary is miserable    is it the multi tax of Trump? 
    • Weightlifting We now have six events per gender with a total of 10 athletes per event.   The Olympic Qualification Rankings will be based on the sum of the total results of five events (three from period 1 and two from period 2). The top 8 will qualify.   The 9th spot will also be based on the OQR, but it will go to the highest ranked athlete from an unrepresented continent.   The 10th spot will be split between the host and universality (3 each per gender). Should the United States qualify normally then their host quota will be reduced, first going to an athlete from an unrepresented continent then to the overall highest ranked athlete.   Additionally, a "Best Lifter" will be awarded which would give the nation the chance to qualify 4 athletes rather than the max of 3.
    • The probability of winning a medal in the men's 500m also seems a bit off   
    • 66% chance for a medal in moguls seems low though...   Men's relay being 5th in short track, and Clarke only having a 0.5% chance at a medal also seem off   Why is ski mountaineering there, we didn't even qualify anyone 
×
×
  • Create New...