website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Biathlon 2016 - 2017 Discussion Thread


hckošice

Recommended Posts

Just now, hckosice said:

 

I have no idea :dunno:

We should find out at some point.

By the way, how are you feeling about the Slovakian prospects in the women's relay? I personally expect a Top 10. Top 7 would be great.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62226
Share on other sites

Just now, ahjfcshfghb said:

We should find out at some point.

By the way, how are you feeling about the Slovakian prospects in the women's relay? I personally expect a Top 10. Top 7 would be great.

 

After 2 legs top 10 is real, but the other 2 will be much more questionable, top 10 would be great, but I´ll be satisfied even also if the girls will fight exemplarily but will finish aroun 13th place.

 

Anyway we need a good result to "calm" more our position in the Nations Cup :d

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62228
Share on other sites

Just now, hckosice said:

 

After 2 legs top 10 is real, but the other 2 will be much more questionable, top 10 would be great, but I´ll be satisfied even also if the girls will fight exemplarily but will finish aroun 13th place.

 

Anyway we need a good result to "calm" more our position in the Nations Cup :d

A top 10 would I guess hinge on Fialkova and Kuzmina going all-out and not losing any ground on the leaders. 

Poliakova's a good shot, but she's slow... Nothing to do about that, just damage limitation really. And Ivona needs to shoot well, too. But I do think a good result is possible

Won't be watching the race though have to get up early tomorrow so Good luck! :cheer:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62230
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ahjfcshfghb said:

A top 10 would I guess hinge on Fialkova and Kuzmina going all-out and not losing any ground on the leaders. 

Poliakova's a good shot, but she's slow... Nothing to do about that, just damage limitation really. And Ivona needs to shoot well, too. But I do think a good result is possible

Won't be watching the race though have to get up early tomorrow so Good luck! :cheer:

 

 

Thanks and good luck to the czechs too, a very good podium place is realistic so let´s hope everything will work well. :yes

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62231
Share on other sites

Sweden was DSQ'ed because of this rule (5.6.e) in the men's relay:

 

8591185d46.png

 

Bruna just told me it was because of the skis (or one of their skis, not sure), so that's a rather amateuristic mistake..

 

The Koreans were DSQ'ed because they didn't stop after being lapped. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62259
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

The Koreans were DSQ'ed because they didn't stop after being lapped. 

 

This is the top of the most stupid things I ever heard :lol:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62260
Share on other sites

Just now, hckosice said:

 

This is the top of the most stupid things I ever heard :lol:

Honestly I think not marking your skis properly is even more dumb :p 

 

Or what about the Russians Dmitry Malyshko and Petr Paschenko in yesterday's IBU Cup sprint...Malyshko won, but was disqualified because he and Paschenko had mixed up their bibs :p 

 

I mean, come on, what are they...5 years old to make such a mistake? 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/47/#findComment-62261
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • It's somewhat surprising that figure skating isn't more popular here.
    • I'm not against team events or even mixed team events, but I think they need to be more than the sum of individual performances. So relays are fine (including team event in luge), team pursuit too, team event in skeleton is ok cause you have this different type of start though I would prefer the luge system (with a chip instead of this board you definitely can't touch in skeleton ?). Rest needs to be rethought at least. And rules need to be coherent between the sports regarding how many teams you can enter, why is it 4 duos in alpine combined event and only 1 in CC team sprint ? 2 would be my limit for dual events, even in sports where they usually don't enter more than one team in WC events.    Alpine skiing (10)   No changes.   Biathlon (11 -> 9)   - Mixed relay + Single mixed relay. Agree with De_Gambassi, different format from the gender relays, increased chances for weaker nations to compete even if we would have two teams for some countries. - Both pursuits. I've seen several people complain about how tired the athletes were by the end of the Games during the mass-starts. Thing is these are the same people that are adamant on keeping the pursuit in the program. Either ditch them or treat the sprint as a qualification round. You would then have one individual races, one MS and one "exciting" double-event.   Bobsleigh (4)   No changes. Max 2 teams per country.   Cross-country skiing (12 -> 11)   - Both team sprints. + Mixed team sprint.  Same idea as in biathlon. Like some I'm all for a real sprint and not the dull attrition races we witnessed in Val di Fiemme. Freestyle is mandatory, can be uphill/downhill but not longer than 1'30.  - 50km W + 30km W   Curling (3)     No changes.     Figure skating (5 -> 3)   - Team event.  Awful ranking system. - Ice dance.  "Dance", enough said.   Freestyle skiing (15)   - Team aerials. + Ski-cross mixed event. Ideally luge-like with immediate start after your teammate crossed the finish line. Alternate M-W order between the rounds. In snowboard cross men were almost useless all day long.   Ice hockey (2)   No changes.   Luge (6)   No changes.   Nordic combined (3 -> 4)   + Gundersen NH W - Gundersen NH M + Mass-start LH M - Team event + Mixed team event   Short-track speed skating (9)   No changes.   Skeleton (3)    No changes.   Ski jumping (6 -> 5)   - Super team M   Ski mountaineering (3)   - Both sprints + Both individuals   Snowboarding (11)   No changes.   Speed skating (14)   - Mass-start in the current format is shite + (Re)introduce an allround competition inspired by track cycling's omnium (first version). So a couple of individual races (500 and 3000 ?), an elimination race, a points races to end it.  (-) This would be endurance based so maybe ditch 3000/5000. 
    • Worth noting that these Olympics, there were separate qualification and event threads where as in the past, they were merged together in one thread so that makes the increase in replies even more impressive.
    • The best part of last nights closing ceremony was the highlight montage Eurosport made.   Anyone who didn't see it NEEDS to see it. Amazing.   Probably my second favourite montage of an OG after the London one in 2012.    
    • After our first ever Olympic medal, it's time for our first Paralympic medal.  The chances are good, but I'm traumatized by the Chinese after 2022.    I'm also concerned about the atmosphere of these games. 
    • no, there was a world cup stage also the following year, then the track was dismissed and the hall reverted back to its usual tasks (not sport related)
    • That wasn't cheating, cheating is doing something against the rules for your advantage. I read the rulebook, and not only was it not clear enough on the matter for it to be a burned rock even though it should've been, there's no advantage to what he did. 
    • Tuesday February 24th, 2026 - Round-Robin Day 2 Schedule (GMT +1)   12:30   Turkiye vs Romania 16:00   Thailand vs Serbia 19:30   Croatia vs Bulgaria
    • Monday February 23rd, 2026 - Round-Robin Day 1 Results (GMT +1)   12:30   Serbia  2 - 4  Turkiye 16:00   Bulgaria  1 - 5  Romania 19:30   Thailand  2 - 1  Croatia   Provisional Standing After Day 1:   1.    3 ----------------- 2.   3 3.   3 4.   0 5.   0 ----------------- 6.   0
×
×
  • Create New...