website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Rowing 2016 Discussion Thread


MantaRaymarc

Recommended Posts

Entry list for Latin American regatta is out. Big change is that from this Olympics a country can qualify only one boat per gender here. And that's quite good actually because we will no longer see the likes of Argentina or Mexico taking all four of these "gift quotas". Yes, these continental quotas in rowing are really gifts.

 

It's just so odd to see some small Carribean Island nations competing here! :VIN:BAH:BER

 

http://www.worldrowing.com/mm//Document/General/General/12/23/33/EntriesbyBoatNameValparaisoOQR140316_Neutral.pdf

Edited by dcro

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3237
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2016 at 2:04 AM, intoronto said:

FISA is proposing that countries can compete in a maximum 10-12 (out of 14) events at the Olympics moving forward. 

Any reason for that besides weakening the overall fields?

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3284
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, dcro said:

Entry list for Latin American regatta is out. Big change is that from this Olympics a country can qualify only one boat per gender here. And that's quite good actually because we will no longer see the likes of Argentina or Mexico taking all four of these "gift quotas". Yes, these continental quotas in rowing are really gifts.

 

It's just so odd to see some small Carribean Island nations competing here! :VIN:BAH:BER

 

http://www.worldrowing.com/mm//Document/General/General/12/23/33/EntriesbyBoatNameValparaisoOQR140316_Neutral.pdf

 

What if Cuba has already claimed a spot in the men's lightweight double sculls, knowing that Angel Fournier also competes in the men's single sculls with a top six finish at the Worlds? 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3307
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MantaRaymarc said:

 

What if Cuba has already claimed a spot in the men's lightweight double sculls, knowing that Angel Fournier also competes in the men's single sculls with a top six finish at the Worlds? 

he can't compete in lightweight dobule sculls,because he is not lightweight rower :d

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3313
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, heywoodu said:

Any reason for that besides weakening the overall fields?

 

Obviously they are thinking about having more nations competing and more nations on podiums.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3314
Share on other sites

Just now, dcro said:

 

Obviously they are thinking about having more nations competing and more nations on podiums.

That's a shame to do it like that, especially if that would mean the Olympic champions aren't the best in their class but only are lucky to not have to compete against stronger competitors. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3315
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MantaRaymarc said:

 

What if Cuba has already claimed a spot in the men's lightweight double sculls, knowing that Angel Fournier also competes in the men's single sculls with a top six finish at the Worlds? 


Fournier qualified at the WCh, so Cuba is eligible to qualify lightweight sculls here.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3316
Share on other sites

Just now, heywoodu said:

That's a shame to do it like that, especially if that would mean the Olympic champions aren't the best in their class but only are lucky to not have to compete against stronger competitors. 

 

Yes, I agree with that.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/33-rowing-2016-discussion-thread/#findComment-3317
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • December 2025 International break   12.12.2025   -------------------------------------------------   EUROPEAN NATIONS LEAGUE   Division A   CHRISTMAS KAUFLAND CUP   -   3-2 After OT   Final Standing: 1. SVK 5  2. NOR 4  3. NOR 0 Played All Matches   -------------------------------------------------   Division B   -   4-3 After PSO  -   1-2   Standing After Day 1: 1. ITA 3 2. POL 2 3. FRA 1 4. HUN 0   -------------------------------------------------   Division C   -   1-2   Standing After Match 2/3: 1. UKR 6 2. ROU 0
    • yeah, however, Zorzi is a good name for Italian sportsmen   we had the top scorer of the '90s Volleyball NT (he is from Noale, Venice...the same place of the Motorbike factory Aprilia) and we have more to come, as there are 3 brothers playing Kitesurf, 2 of them being youth European and World medallists in the last years   and there's also a TV presenter with that Family name, but that's another story
    • Women´s World Championship 2025 (Brno, Ostrava  )   DAY 7 - 12.12.2025     Quarterfinals   -   14-2 -   16-3   9th Place Match   -   1-5   11th Place Match   -   6-4   13th Place Match   -   2-3 After OT   15th Place Match   -   4-3 After OT
    • Ok, that's interesting. So often winter sports are village sports & so everyone with these rare patois names are family.
    • AFAIK, no they're from 2 different regions (Christian is from Trentino, Edoardo from Lombardy, Bergamo province) Zorzi is not an uncommon Family name in North-East of Italy
    • I will definitely vote on Sunday evening as well. This time for real.  Need to fill my final ranking, as i have a couple of clashes, but will be traveling on the weekend, so will finalize things when i get home.
    • I guess, it´s normal. If you look at it from the international federation view Relay quotas goes usually to powerhouses of the sport, countries where the sport is popular, followed by TV viewers etc... means money back, while a bunch of single quotas given for countries which will not even notice the athlete and almost majority of inhabitants do not even know there such sport at the Olympics may be a waste at the end   Not saying I am in favor of it obviously. But I can understand the point, me personally, I will be surprised if I will have time to catch a minute of live watching Shorttrack in Milano for example, quite sure our TV will not make it in its main channel live screen. I guarantee you that already 
    • Biden had no idea, and neither does Trump. Each for different reasons: Biden feared World War III, while Trump wants to do business with Russia. It would take someone like Reagan to put more pressure on Russia, and that would also be a strategy for years, not 1-2.
    • Maybe they should but they clearly don't based on how the document is written, D.2.2 makes it clear that the fifth relay quota (for teams w/ 8 or more starting position) has pririty over individual quotas.   The fact that there is a gender imbalance in how the quotas are allocated is weird, but it does sort of make sense because of how D2.3 is written. Quotas are handed out in rotation, and it just so happens that if you go through the process the three missing quotas are all in the women's 1500m. It's a badly written document (like every single ISU Olympic qualification document always is >.> ) but I don't think there is another interpretation of it that could be valid. You award quotas in this order, going from 1st to 32nd (or 36th) in the ranking until you hid 112: Men's 500m Women's 500m Women's 1000m Men's 1000m Men's 1500m Women's 1500m They would not have included both genders on the same rotation if the intent wasn't to allow an inbalance in gender quotas after completing D2.3.
×
×
  • Create New...