website statistics
Jump to content

AIN athletes qualification for Paris 2024 Olympic Games and reallocation of quotas [post#1 updated 15.07]


 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, avlar said:

I would say we can get announcements on tennis and possibly modern pentathlon next week. I suppose rowing will be there too.

 

Judo will have final rankings next week. but IJF needs some time for formalities. And the IOC will need time to check the entries - it will be a very big group of AINs. So they will need another week, I think.

 

World Aquatics will have final entries for swimiing next week too. There are not so many athletes to be checked. So they may be the same time as judo.

 

Shooting and Canoe are the very uncertain.

 

Shooting (normal) reallocation procedure is very complicated and long. I doubt if ISSF will send AIN entries to the IOC until all normal reallocations are done.

 

And Canoe is delayed by russians. ICF is waiting for them to reject C1 or C2 quota from the European qualifier. 

 

* * *

 

By the way, I am very surprised with the absence of the rowing in the first group of sports from the IOC. Qualification process inf rowing finished "centuries ago" and they have only 1 AIN boat to check. At the same time deadline for reallocation in Rowing is 23.06.24. So World Rowing may be waiting for this date to send entries to the IOC.

 

But on the other hand we stiil unaware of the fate of AIN pairs/doubles for Paris. And rowing is exactly the case, as well as tennis and canoe.

Thank you ! You’re very helpful :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, avlar said:

I would say we can get announcements on tennis and possibly modern pentathlon next week. I suppose rowing will be there too.

 

Judo will have final rankings next week. but IJF needs some time for formalities. And the IOC will need time to check the entries - it will be a very big group of AINs. So they will need another week, I think.

 

World Aquatics will have final entries for swimiing next week too. There are not so many athletes to be checked. So they may be the same time as judo.

 

Shooting and Canoe are the very uncertain.

 

Shooting (normal) reallocation procedure is very complicated and long. I doubt if ISSF will send AIN entries to the IOC until all normal reallocations are done.

 

And Canoe is delayed by russians. ICF is waiting for them to reject C1 or C2 quota from the European qualifier. 

 

* * *

 

By the way, I am very surprised with the absence of the rowing in the first group of sports from the IOC. Qualification process inf rowing finished "centuries ago" and they have only 1 AIN boat to check. At the same time deadline for reallocation in Rowing is 23.06.24. So World Rowing may be waiting for this date to send entries to the IOC.

 

But on the other hand we stiil unaware of the fate of AIN pairs/doubles for Paris. And rowing is exactly the case, as well as tennis and canoe.

I didn’t realize ain qualified a team boat in rowing. I just thought they had the men’s C2. Why is Russia taking so long to  choose. Isn’t it in their best interest to choose the C2 because they also qualify for the individual events as well? Or do they think if they choose C2 and the ioc doesn’t except it they will not be allowed in the C1 either because they rejected it .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Surlympics said:

I didn’t realize ain qualified a team boat in rowing. I just thought they had the men’s C2. Why is Russia taking so long to  choose. Isn’t it in their best interest to choose the C2 because they also qualify for the individual events as well? Or do they think if they choose C2 and the ioc doesn’t except it they will not be allowed in the C1 either because they rejected it .

Here is the thing: Korovashkov/Shtyl are weak as fuck in C1 500, so it's not a case. So it's a hard choice for them, hopefully IOC rejected them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Belarusian Wrestling Federation reports with great regret that 9 out of 10 wrestlers selected for Paris will not take part in the Olympic Games by decision of the IOC, Abubakar Khaslakhanov will become the only representative of Belarusian wrestling."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dragon said:

"The Belarusian Wrestling Federation reports with great regret that 9 out of 10 wrestlers selected for Paris will not take part in the Olympic Games by decision of the IOC, Abubakar Khaslakhanov will become the only representative of Belarusian wrestling."

and this means that :ITA Frank Chamizo will truly be reallocated a spot...or not? :mumble:

Edited by phelps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dragon said:

Unconfirmed as yet but the rumour is that the whole Russian judo team (or at least 90%) have been rejected by the IOC

Where did you see this information?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Rather negative     Both towards Vollering and towards the coach, who has been making a mess of this for years now (like Tokyo). Vollering literally said "it was not good for me that Markus and Vos were still in the front towards the end"     One of the most well-known journalists (albeit a bit of a drama queen, but in this case, he's right): "Absurdly bad race by Vollering. Unbelievable."   An entire analysis titled "Vollering only thought of herself and threw away and almost certain Dutch medal": https://www.wielerflits.nl/nieuws/demi-vollering-dacht-alleen-aan-zichzelf-en-verspeelt-vrijwel-zekere-wk-medaille-voor-nederland/   Vollering: "They were all riding just to make me lose"   https://www.gelderlander.nl/video/productie/vollering-mij-laten-verliezen-wk-zurich-772648?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F   The 100th time Vollering shows she should simply not be in a team like this. It is always trouble, every single time. We need a team with like 6 Marianne Vos clones, she has the experience, she can read a race like absolutely nobody else in the world can and she plays her role, whether that's the team captain or working for someone else, without complaining and to the fullest extent.   Vollering is the exact opposite of Vos. Vollering rides for Team Vollering, which consists of Demi Vollering. No matter what.
    • What did Dutch press make out of it? It was one of the worst "teamworks" I have ever seen in cycling.
    • There is a ton of evidence, even if you don't believe the Bible is real,  that israel is our ancestral land.  And we simply took what's ours.  And in fact there was never anyone named Palestinians there.   Simply a name given to the region by the Roman's.  But the actual people is just a collective of individuals from different Arab countries where they were kicked out from.  And we are expected to cater to them.   There are plenty of other countries that should take them.   Iran, qatar, Iraq, Kuwait, Yemen, Algeria,  libiya, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco to name a few.   
    • Completely lost track of when the other final, but I just finished watching the pre-recorded version of it.   Team “Magic Mike” McEwen defeated Team Gushue 8-3 to win his third title (and in a row) of the season. 
    • Massive win indeed, a 80+ kilometer solo in the world championships, damn  (I mean, Sivakov jumped with him to try and help him of course, but couldn't do anything but sit in his wheel until he got dropped )
    • If even Erdogan calls you a psychopath, you're probably been....bad.    
    • Meanwhile:         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_al-Assad
    • Sure, some things are simply historical events retold with a kind of fantasy layer over it, to make it more appealing to read and/or - most importantly - to put some lessons into it, which is fine (and which is the main way to read most religious texts, as 'lessons' and messages by the writers instead of actual historical facts). But let's not pretend that things like Moses splitting the sea or the entire exodus have a significant historical basis, based on actual evidence. Anyway, like I said: I'm well aware people who believe the religious book of their choosing is a historical book aren't going to ever believe otherwise, I grew up in a town full of similiarly minded people  
    • Have you ever been to Israel? Because you can find historical evidence of many of the "stories"   And btw we are talking about 3000 years before us    
    • What a win, and what a year for this guy!     
×
×
  • Create New...