Men's Football FIFA World Cup 2018

[ChandlerMne 1,202]

3 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

It definitely was. The foul was clear and it was right on the line, which means inside the penalty box.

Foul started outside the penalty box. At least referee should have consult VAR. Plus,many website also noted that penalty was controversial.

[heywoodu 16,004]

2 minutes ago, Griff88 said:

Lukaku goal: Dammit Tunisia, should've given chance to Congo DR instead.

 

Bronn goal: Ohhh nevermind... So exciting!

What does Lukaku have with Congo DR apart from having a dad who lived there in the first part of his life?  

[heywoodu 16,004]

1 minute ago, ChandlerMne said:

Foul started outside the penalty box. At least referee should have consult VAR. Plus,many website also noted that penalty was controversial.

 

Many websites also noted the penalty was, when looking at the replay, a penalty. Maybe there's a lone referee here and there who would have decided otherwise, but it's not even close to a robbery or something. 

[bestmen 2,903]

2-1 , this is my prediction

[Dunadan 1,103]

Just now, ChandlerMne said:

Foul started outside the penalty box. At least referee should have consult VAR. 

The VAR surely checked it and confirmed the decision.

I think many people here have no idea that the VAR is a referee who checks every decision about penalties, goals, red cards...If the decision is confirmed, the head referee will never go himself to watch the video.

[heywoodu 16,004]

Neymar can take an example from Lukaku: falling in the penalty area but immediately raising his hand to signal it was nothing but simply a fall.

[ChandlerMne 1,202]

Just now, heywoodu said:

 

Many websites also noted the penalty was, when looking at the replay, a penalty. Maybe there's a lone referee here and there who would have decided otherwise, but it's not even close to a robbery or something. 

I agree,it wasnt robbery but it was 50:50 chance to be called a penalty. This referee called,someone else wouldnt. Lets say it was borderline. 

[heywoodu 16,004]

Just now, ChandlerMne said:

I agree,it wasnt robbery but it was 50:50 chance to be called a penalty. This referee called,someone else wouldnt. Lets say it was borderline. 

Literally  

[ChandlerMne 1,202]

2 minutes ago, Dunadan said:

The VAR surely checked it and confirmed the decision.

I think many people here have no idea that the VAR is a referee who checks every decision about penalties, goals, red cards...If the decision is confirmed, the head referee will never go himself to watch the video.

It was actually a silent check. Too bad they didnt replay it more times. Now its all over.

At least we have very good game here.

[ChandlerMne 1,202]

2 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Literally