website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

India National Thread


gvaisakh
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Harit Garg said:

We can achieve 35 quota in athletics. What's your views.

Depends on the relays .................. if either the 4*100 women or 4*400 men make it ...there is a good chance  ( I am presuming the indian 4*400 women of course make it ) 

Edited by nitinsanker

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27596
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, sameerph said:

 

There are no ranking points for mixed doubles. Rohan-Sania should have played together at Wimbledon which would have given them some match practice before Rio.

 

I do not agree with the reason Sania gave in in interview that she had a prior commitment to play with Dodig. Why should she commit in first place when it was well known that she would play mixed doubles for India at Rio ( either with Leander or Rohan).

 

 

 

I think Sania gave the commitment to Dodig in Dec-Jan itself. At that point, Leander was considered pretty much a sure bet for the Mixed as opposed to Rohan, with Lee having won 3 of the last 4 mixed doubles grand slams. While his ranking had dipped a bit, everyone expected him to improve it in the Olympic year as opposed to dipping to such a level that he may not even qualify.

 

And there was no way Leander was splitting with Hingis to even play just Wimbledon with Sania (even Saina would not want that situation) .Thats why probably, Sania commited to Dodig. Of course, without a commitment, Dodig might have looked for other partners.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27604
Share on other sites

Posting the India based fantasy Olympic game link again...for people who may want to join.. @tirtha22 @Smit

 @Dolby @rohan sharma

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13TQQ4W-cut7RCuxnem5uQKZaBNJNq4HzYyiXv_JbTo4/edit

 

@nitinsanker I think we need to keep the number to 15 as 10 would make the teams even more similar..the last 4-5 spots are the ones actually creating differences in the teams.

Edited by kapil857
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27607
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tirtha22 said:

Cricket will be part of 2024 Olympics if Rome wins hosting rights

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/story/1031283.html

I think it may be diplomatic strategy of Italy to win votes of cricket playing nations.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27615
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kapil857 said:

Posting the India based fantasy Olympic game link again...for people who may want to join.. @tirtha22 @Smit

 @Dolby @rohan sharma

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13TQQ4W-cut7RCuxnem5uQKZaBNJNq4HzYyiXv_JbTo4/edit

 

@nitinsanker I think we need to keep the number to 15 as 10 would make the teams even more similar..the last 4-5 spots are the ones actually creating differences in the teams.

Kapil do we add G , S , B , 4th place and top 8 against the 15 ? like in brackets ? ............ Saina ( S) 

Edited by nitinsanker

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27616
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Vivek said:

I think it may be diplomatic strategy of Italy to win votes of cricket playing nations.

Yes I thought the same but its fine as long as they include Cricket after winning the hosting rights. They won't refuse to include Cricket after giving a word. And they will have provision of adding 5 new games so giving one place to cricket shouldn't be any harm as the cricket playing countries have backed them in winning

Edited by Smit
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27618
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kapil857 said:

Posting the India based fantasy Olympic game link again...for people who may want to join.. @tirtha22 @Smit

 @Dolby @rohan sharma

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13TQQ4W-cut7RCuxnem5uQKZaBNJNq4HzYyiXv_JbTo4/edit

 

@nitinsanker I think we need to keep the number to 15 as 10 would make the teams even more similar..the last 4-5 spots are the ones actually creating differences in the teams.

I'll add my team today

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27619
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, nitinsanker said:

Kapil do we add G , S , B , 4th place and top 8 against the 15 ? 

 

Thats what the captain and vice captain are for - pick the ones u think will win gold or silver as captain and vice captain.

 

Personally, I dont want to be predicting 4th place and top 8 for players like, say, Bindra or Narang who I hope to see return with gold, but if I have to predict exact placing then i'll probably have to predict a lower placing for them. But if there are others here who want to participate and think its good idea then we can consider it...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27620
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Smit said:

Yes I thought the same but its fine as long as they include Cricket after winning the hosting rights. They won't refuse to include Cricket after giving a word. And they will have provision of adding 5 new games so giving one place to cricket shouldn't be any harm as the cricket playing countries have backed them in winning

 

Ploy or not I know who I'll be supporting through the bidding process....

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27621
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kapil857 said:

 

Thats what the captain and vice captain are for - pick the ones u think will win gold or silver as captain and vice captain.

 

Personally, I dont want to be predicting 4th place and top 8 for players like, say, Bindra or Narang who I hope to see return with gold, but if I have to predict exact placing then i'll probably have to predict a lower placing for them. But if there are others here who want to participate and think its good idea then we can consider it...

 

As it is a prediction contest................ we could also add +5 points where your prediction matches with the result ? , for example if I gave sania a silver and she gets a silver my team gets an additional 5 points ? do you feel this will make it more interesting and also allow a better points distribution ?...maybe we can only give G or S  or B ( no 4th or top 8  ) ........................ as we are hoping all of them medal ...

Edited by nitinsanker

strength does not come from physical capacity but from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/page/282/#findComment-27622
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/84-india-national-thread/
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...