website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Road Cycling 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

http://sport24.lefigaro.fr/cyclisme/tour-de-france/actualites/tour-de-france-la-16e-etape-en-direct-815630

 

:lol: 3rd win for the czech Sagan ...still better than Slovakia/Slovenia issue but this one :bowdown:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32413
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hckosice said:

http://sport24.lefigaro.fr/cyclisme/tour-de-france/actualites/tour-de-france-la-16e-etape-en-direct-815630

 

:lol: 3rd win for the czech Sagan ...still better than Slovakia/Slovenia issue but this one :bowdown:

:facepalm:but i was very happy for him today. And Tinkov was great too.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32415
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, stepansevs said:

:facepalm:but i was very happy for him today. And Tinkov was great too.

 

:d

 

yes, but still nothing new about Tinkoff continuing also next season...so far he put up only this pic :lol:https://www.instagram.com/p/BIAhgeNhANU/

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32426
Share on other sites

Cavendish abandoned the tour.

 

Sagan is now 177 points ahead of the second (Kittel) in the green jersey battle with one sprint stage 3 mountains and 1 time trial remaining :lol:

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32781
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hckosice said:

Cavendish abandoned the tour.

 

Sagan is now 177 points ahead of the second (Kittel) in the green jersey battle with one sprint stage 3 mountains and 1 time trial remaining :lol:

 

As you know I'm a big fan of Sagan like almost everyone else, but I really hope this points system gets changed in some way. Not "to fight against Sagan", but because certain things are just weird. If a stage is a mountaineous stage, you get much less points for winning the stage (logical), but it's unbelievably strange that the number of points for the intermediate sprints stay the same...

 

For example in a flat stage you get 50 points for winning the stage and 20 for winning the intermediate sprint.

In a mountain stage you get 20 points for winning the stage...but still 20 for winning the intermediate sprint..that makes no sense and I hope that gets changed as soon as possible. 

 

If they want to make differences between the stages in terms of points, that's great I think, but then they should just cancel the intermediate sprints in mountain stages :) 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32782
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, heywoodu said:

 

As you know I'm a big fan of Sagan like almost everyone else, but I really hope this points system gets changed in some way. Not "to fight against Sagan", but because certain things are just weird. If a stage is a mountaineous stage, you get much less points for winning the stage (logical), but it's unbelievably strange that the number of points for the intermediate sprints stay the same...

 

For example in a flat stage you get 50 points for winning the stage and 20 for winning the intermediate sprint.

In a mountain stage you get 20 points for winning the stage...but still 20 for winning the intermediate sprint..that makes no sense and I hope that gets changed as soon as possible. 

 

If they want to make differences between the stages in terms of points, that's great I think, but then they should just cancel the intermediate sprints in mountain stages :) 

 

i understand your view, but you know that its mainly the intermediate sprints in the mountains stages which are the Sagan strongest card and which make the difference :d

 

but yes, well, you know that they changed the rules because Sagan won easily the green two years in arow, so suddenly they made 50-30-20 points system in sprint arrival, just to make the competition harder and as they say more interesting, (which is very unfair, if you finish third you are already 30 points behind, so it´s why there need also the intermediate sprints in the "lumpy" stages :d to give all kind of racers more or less the same chances.

but sure, I would more like if they returned back to the previous system. but no chance for that,:( now I´m really wonder what they will invent for the next seasons, maybe 100 points for the flat stages winner and 50 for the second ;)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32796
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hckosice said:

 

i understand your view, but you know that its mainly the intermediate sprints in the mountains stages which are the Sagan strongest card and which make the difference :d

 

but yes, well, you know that they changed the rules because Sagan won easily the green two years in arow, so suddenly they made 50-30-20 points system in sprint arrival, just to make the competition harder and as they say more interesting, (which is very unfair, if you finish third you are already 30 points behind, so it´s why there need also the intermediate sprints in the "lumpy" stages :d to give all kind of racers more or less the same chances.

but sure, I would more like if they returned back to the previous system. but no chance for that,:( now I´m really wonder what they will invent for the next seasons, maybe 100 points for the flat stages winner and 50 for the second ;)

:d

 

Personally I would go for 0 points in mountain stages (there are mountain points for that), a few points in hilly stages and for flat stages something like 25-20-18-etc (a bit like in MotoGP or Formula 1). And no intermediate sprints, they're useless :p 

 

 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32798
Share on other sites

Tour de France 2016

:FRA Various Cities (FRA) - 02.07.2016 - 24.07.2016 :FRA

  le-tour-logo.jpg

 

Stage 17

  :SUI Bern  -  Finhaut Emosson  :SUI

(184,5km - Mountain)

 

 

c232TH6-TSvoGIzi6Uy5tg%7Eprofil-17etapa-

 

 

17. etapa Tour de France: Mapa, profil a favoriti na víťazstvo

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/35-road-cycling-2016-discussion-thread/page/55/#findComment-32826
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Latest World Championships Medal Count in the Road to Los Angeles 2028   2024-2028 Olympic Cycle Medal Count in the Road to Los Angeles 2028   2025 World Championships in the Road To Los Angeles 2028   Final 2025 Update
    • The Colorado Springs Athletic Center will be closed to foreigners in 2028 to protect Americans at the Olympic Games Michael Phelps disagrees with the decision   The US Olympic Committee will no longer allow foreign swimmers to use the Colorado Springs Athletic Center, but only in 2028, to protect the interests of American swimmers ahead of the Olympics.   CEO Kevin Ring revealed that there is a rule prohibiting foreign swimmers from entering the high-performance center starting in 2028.   This is due to several reports and complaints received by USA Swimming, highlighting how US coaches are working with foreign swimmers to beat Americans on their home turf, at their own Olympics.   In 2029, after the California Olympics, the doors of the athletic center are expected to reopen to foreigners, but with much higher rates than the current ones ($125/night).   Michael Phelps, who had previously criticized the US Swimming Federation along with Ryan Lochte, has also intervened in the matter.   During the World Championships in Singapore: "What are our real goals? I grew up training with all athletes, including foreigners. We've never discriminated against anyone in our team."   Phelps was coached by Bob Bowman (who recently completed a 24-day training camp with his team, composed primarily of foreign swimmers), and therefore defends his mentor and the team's philosophy.   USA Swimming also emphasized that other high-performance sports centers (such as the one in Flagstaff, Arizona) will have no difficulty hosting training camps for foreign national teams who request them.   The issue of foreign swimmers in the US is becoming very sensitive in light of America's dominance, which has significantly weakened in recent years (recall when in Omaha, during the 2008 and 2012 trials, Dave Salo secretly coached Japan's Kitajima, at different times than the American swimmers on his team).   Is the "America first" philosophy a new form of protectionism in swimming too?   Meanwhile, foreign athletes help colleges win and make money in the NCAA system.   Colorado Springs's view, therefore, seems hypocritical, opportunistic, and arrogant.     from an Italian Swimming blog, related to a Gazzetta dello Sport newspaper's journalist
    • Dutch track championships these days: - Tokyo BMX Olympic champion Niek Kimmann at the start of the sprint event, making a rookie mistake in the 200 metres qualifying, by misjudging the finish line: - Lorena Wiebes winning the Keirin, beating European champion Steffie van der Peet. She has no plans to add this number to her international program, but it shows her immense sprinting abilities.
    • The unanimous opinion is that Leerdam will be nominated for the 1000 metres, apparantly even among the coaches.   As I understand it, this means she will take Kok’s 1000 metres spot in the matrix (place 5), Kok will take the Schulting place (7, but of course she’s allready in through the 500 metres) and Schulting will be relegated to Verkerk’s spot, number 15 and last. This will only be a problem if there are 9 skaters before her, which seems unlikely. Currently there are 7 names in the matrix. If the last two races will go to form, at most 2 names will be added (possibly Rijpma-De Jong in the 1500 metres, and less likely In t Hof or Kerkhoff in the 5000.) Only if the last two both qualify, we will get to 10 names, and then Schulting is out. There is a chance that it will remain at 7 names. That would need for Kok to qualify for the 1500 metres, which seems unlikely where it not for the fact that she owns the track record for that distance. In that case expect Rijpma to be added for the team pursuit and Kerkhoff for the mass start.
    • Monday December 29th, 2025   Preliminary Round Day 4 Schedule   Group A Central Standard Time (GMT -6)   (CET 19:00) Germany  vs  Sweden Period-by-Period: December 29th 2025, h. 12:00, Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul   (CET 00:00 - 30.12.2025) Slovakia  vs  United States Period-by-Period: December 29th 2025, h. 17:00, Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul   Group B Central Standard Time (GMT -6)   (CET 21:30) Finland  vs  Czechia Period-by-Period: December 29th 2025, h. 14:30, 3M Arena at Mariucci, Minneapolis   (CET 02:30 - 30.12.2025) Canada  vs  Denmark Period-by-Period: December 29th 2025, h. 19:30, 3M Arena at Mariucci, Minneapolis
    • DAY 3 HIGHLIGHTS   Finland   8 - 0   Latvia Period-by-Period: 3-0, 2-0, 3-0 December 28th 2025, h. 15:30, 3M Arena at Mariucci, Minneapolis  
    • DAY 3 HIGHLIGHTS   Sweden   4 - 2   Switzerland Period-by-Period: 1-1, 0-1, 3-0 December 28th 2025, h. 13:00, Grand Casino Arena, St. Paul  
    • On Jutta Leerdam, what happens if Naomi Verkerk (third place finisher in 1000m) ends up within the top 9 of the matrix, something like this:   Kok Groenewoud Beune Schulting Conijn Rijpma-de Jong Leerdam Boersma Verkerk In that case, would the only way Leerdam can race the Olympic 1000m be if the selectors make a discretionary call to do so? I do see the word "calamiteit" in the selection procedures -- https://knsb.nl/media/documents/KNSB_selectiedocument_2025-2026_OS_Milaan_def_29sept25.pdf -- but I, just an English speaker, can't make out through google translate whether the "calamiteit" mentioned in the PDF would cover this situation.   What have they been saying about this on NOS?
    • She could be a dark horse. But she has to be 100% good in 2 runs- she's always taking a huge risk and often exaggerates the risk. However, I wouldn't give her any less of a chance than, like Shiffrin in the giant slalom.
×
×
  • Create New...