website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Doping Cases and Bans in 2025


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, heywoodu said:

Dutch NOS headline today: "Long suspension for Sinner" :yikes: 

 

 

 

What the actual text says: 3 months suspension, doesn't even miss a single Grand Slam :lol: 

Billy Joel song "Only the Good Die Young" includes the lines;

"I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints"

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682680
Share on other sites

Big money, good lawyers for the liar sinner - now back to South Tyrol Monaco to take some boosters in time for Roland-Garros.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682682
Share on other sites

Since when can you "reach an agreement" regarding a doping suspension? What a joke. Djokovic suffered more for not taking the vaccine than Sinner for failing two doping tests. There is no justice in this sport. A big shame.

 

I don't believe it was intentional but when others like Halep, Sharapova, Jarry were suspended for much longer and even Ymer for not even failing any tests, this seems so ridiculous in comparison.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682720
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Makedonas said:

Since when can you "reach an agreement" regarding a doping suspension? What a joke. Djokovic suffered more for not taking the vaccine than Sinner for failing two doping tests. There is no justice in this sport. A big shame.

 

I don't believe it was intentional but when others like Halep, Sharapova, Jarry were suspended for much longer and even Ymer for not even failing any tests, this seems so ridiculous in comparison.

please, stop making comparison between Sharapova and (above all) Halep's cases and this Sinner's farce :stop:

 

this is just a political fight between WADA and ITIA and many other sports and political institutions

 

even WADA had to officially admit in a written statement that it's NOT about doping, but just an assumption of responsibility for other people in Sinner's staff

 

and it's so absurd that in fact they already changed the rules and a fact like this is no longer subject to any sanction

 

and this is a fact, independently of what people might think about the whole actual story behind all the things we know (I'm the first one to think that Sinner is not so "innocent", because I know very well the Clostebol history and usage)

 

 

but Sharapova and Halep were caught intentionally and consciously using banned substances. Point.

 

they are true cheaters that deserve any single day of their ban (actually, Halep used a medicine reserved only for people diagnosed with a fatal illness, available only in the oncological department of an hospital because of the enormous counter-indications it has for the people who have no other option but using it to save their life)

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682726
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Makedonas said:

Since when can you "reach an agreement" regarding a doping suspension? What a joke. Djokovic suffered more for not taking the vaccine than Sinner for failing two doping tests. There is no justice in this sport. A big shame.

 

I don't believe it was intentional but when others like Halep, Sharapova, Jarry were suspended for much longer and even Ymer for not even failing any tests, this seems so ridiculous in comparison.

Swiatek?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682727
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, phelps said:

please, stop making comparison between Sharapova and (above all) Halep's cases and this Sinner's farce :stop:

 

this is just a political fight between WADA and ITIA and many other sports and political institutions

 

even WADA had to officially admit in a written statement that it's NOT about doping, but just an assumption of responsibility for other people in Sinner's staff

 

and it's so absurd that in fact they already changed the rules and a fact like this is no longer subject to any sanction

 

and this is a fact, independently of what people might think about the whole actual story behind all the things we know (I'm the first one to think that Sinner is not so "innocent", because I know very well the Clostebol history and usage)

 

 

but Sharapova and Halep were caught intentionally and consciously using banned substances. Point.

 

they are true cheaters that deserve any single day of their ban (actually, Halep used a medicine reserved only for people diagnosed with a fatal illness, available only in the oncological department of an hospital because of the enormous counter-indications it has for the people who have no other option but using it to save their life)

More suspicious to me is the Swiatek case and her short suspension- 1 month + the fact that the head of WADA is a Pole - Witold Banka...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682728
Share on other sites

Just now, copravolley said:

More suspicious to me is the Swiatek case and her short suspension- 1 month + the fact that the head of WADA is a Pole - Witold Banka...

I don't have enough infos about her case, so I just can't say anything

 

I can only hope that they ruled it correctly

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682729
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, phelps said:

I don't have enough infos about her case, so I just can't say anything

 

I can only hope that they ruled it correctly

Just imagine their opinions if the head of WADA was an Italian...

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682731
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, phelps said:

please, stop making comparison between Sharapova and (above all) Halep's cases and this Sinner's farce :stop:

 

this is just a political fight between WADA and ITIA and many other sports and political institutions

 

even WADA had to officially admit in a written statement that it's NOT about doping, but just an assumption of responsibility for other people in Sinner's staff

 

and it's so absurd that in fact they already changed the rules and a fact like this is no longer subject to any sanction

 

and this is a fact, independently of what people might think about the whole actual story behind all the things we know (I'm the first one to think that Sinner is not so "innocent", because I know very well the Clostebol history and usage)

 

 

but Sharapova and Halep were caught intentionally and consciously using banned substances. Point.

 

they are true cheaters that deserve any single day of their ban (actually, Halep used a medicine reserved only for people diagnosed with a fatal illness, available only in the oncological department of an hospital because of the enormous counter-indications it has for the people who have no other option but using it to save their life)

Out of genuine curiosity: was the Errani thing with the cancer medicine that fell in the pasta sauce a political case as well (in your opinion, of course)? :p

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682733
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Out of genuine curiosity: was the Errani thing with the cancer medicine that fell in the pasta sauce a political case as well (in your opinion, of course)? :p

:rofl:

 

no, that was just a true farce comparable to Paquillo Fernandez's or all the other improbable (to say the least) excuses I've read here and there through the years

 

I had to take care of my mom who had breast cancer first and then the fatal leukemia and I can tell you that it's absolutely impossible that she ended up with her mom's cancer medicines in her soup (or whatever it was)...there's no way you handle those things with such level of superficiality

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/28773-doping-cases-and-bans-in-2025/page/2/#findComment-682734
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...