website statistics
Jump to content

Team GB Daily: Day 15


 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, RussB said:

Strange to have Caden as an underdog given his root to the final.

both women look great in the MP

emma looks very strong in the sprint.

 

as much as I’m all for doom and gloom let’s try and keep it realistic. 

I am keeping it realistic. I'm not to keen on Caden's style and he's got a tough opponent in Sapina and Salimi so I'm not favouring him by any means. Finucane's looked good but I want to see how she fairs against the 2 Germans and Gros before handing her the medal. I thought Bryson looked good in her semi final but so did the Italian behind her so that for me is too close to call, French was quite off it for me and won't challenge. The 2 4x4s won't win, there are too many contenders who are better than us. Finishing in 8th behind Netherlands and Germany, which is the worst we can realistically finish, would best reflect where we are atm as a nation and the transitional period we're currently going through - the total medals we'll probably end up with (60-62) will reflect the talent pool we've got but the position we finish (if we do go on to finish outside of top 5) will reflect how our athletes lack that clinical edge in pressurised situation to go on and be the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cinnamon Bun said:

I am keeping it realistic. I'm not to keen on Caden's style and he's got a tough opponent in Sapina and Salimi so I'm not favouring him by any means. Finucane's looked good but I want to see how she fairs against the 2 Germans and Gros before handing her the medal. I thought Bryson looked good in her semi final but so did the Italian behind her so that for me is too close to call, French was quite off it for me and won't challenge. The 2 4x4s won't win, there are too many contenders who are better than us. Finishing in 8th behind Netherlands and Germany, which is the worst we can realistically finish, would best reflect where we are atm as a nation and the transitional period we're currently going through - the total medals we'll probably end up with (60-62) will reflect the talent pool we've got but the position we finish (if we do go on to finish outside of top 5) will reflect how our athletes lack that clinical edge in pressurised situation to go on and be the best. 

Sorry a lot of this I can't agree with.

French had one disastrous shoot and then still easily ran to the front group by the end - in my opinion ruling her out based on that is extremely foolish.

Gros just got dominated by the Dutch girl and will have to qualify via a repechage, not sure how her form is indicative of challenging Friedrich or Emma.

Basically at worst you have 2 gold medal shots that are 50/50s, that's with a highly pessimistic hat on. Let alone the nonsense about the 4x4s...they probably won't win given the US dominance, but both squads should medal and I expect both will be much closer than you're giving them credit. Not sure who you think are the "better contenders"...the women's team is likely to change all 4 and the men's team is considered 2nd fav behind the US.

Edited by RussB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cinnamon Bun said:

I am keeping it realistic. I'm not to keen on Caden's style and he's got a tough opponent in Sapina and Salimi so I'm not favouring him by any means. Finucane's looked good but I want to see how she fairs against the 2 Germans and Gros before handing her the medal. I thought Bryson looked good in her semi final but so did the Italian behind her so that for me is too close to call, French was quite off it for me and won't challenge. The 2 4x4s won't win, there are too many contenders who are better than us. Finishing in 8th behind Netherlands and Germany, which is the worst we can realistically finish, would best reflect where we are atm as a nation and the transitional period we're currently going through - the total medals we'll probably end up with (60-62) will reflect the talent pool we've got but the position we finish (if we do go on to finish outside of top 5) will reflect how our athletes lack that clinical edge in pressurised situation to go on and be the best. 

I'd say 64-66 for total medals, not 60-62. Already on 58, plus the guaranteed Gold/Silver from Cunningham. Then you've got the 4x400s, the MP women, Finucane/Capewell, Carlin, Men's Madison, Women's Omnium, Artistic Swimming, Muir... Hard not to see another 4-5 medals out of that lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RussB said:

Sorry a lot of this I can't agree with.

French had one disastrous shoot and then still easily ran to the front group by the end - in my opinion ruling her out based on that is extremely foolish.

Gros just got dominated by the Dutch girl and will have to qualify via a repechage, not sure how her form is indicative of challenging Friedrich or Emma.

Basically at worst you have 2 gold medal shots that are 50/50s, that's with a highly pessimistic hat on. Let alone the nonsense about the 4x4s...they probably won't win given the US dominance, but both squads should medal and I expect both will be much closer than you're giving them credit. Not sure who you think are the "better contenders"...the women's team is likely to change all 4 and the men's team is considered 2nd fav behind the US.

My post was in relation to gold medals, not others. Both 4x4 will likely get 3rd behind US and Botswana in men's and US and Netherlands in women's. Taekwondo is too unpredictable and like I said I'm not a fan of Caden's style as it leaves him quite open to an agile attack like that of Salimi's, and with Emma I'd have been more sure of her if she'd have pulled it out the bag in the Keirin. French's run could still clinch her a medal but let's be honest, if Asadauskaite gets within 10 seconds of 1st she's storming home to victory. We've had tons of gold medal chances over 50% these games where we've crumbled enough under pressure to let it slip through our grasp, so I don't see how thinking this now isn't realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After her fence (and likely swim and ride scores) Asaduskaite is not likely to be anywhere near 10 seconds from the front of the laser run… 

 

Ok so you have Botswana beating GB in men’s 4x4, Dutch beating GBR in women’s 4x4, Emma losing to Friedrich and Caden losing the final. Not sure what to make of French not having a chance of gold but “could medal” so will park that.

 

Will check back in on those 4 predictions later. I’d be hugely surprised if 2 or more of the above prove to be accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RussB said:

After her fence (and likely swim and ride scores) Asaduskaite is not likely to be anywhere near 10 seconds from the front of the laser run… 

 

Ok so you have Botswana beating GB in men’s 4x4, Dutch beating GBR in women’s 4x4, Emma losing to Friedrich and Caden losing the final. Not sure what to make of French not having a chance of gold but “could medal” so will park that.

 

Will check back in on those 4 predictions later. I’d be hugely surprised if 2 or more of the above prove to be accurate.

If you’re wrong, you’re buying the entire forum a round right?

 

I’ll take a mid range lager please! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Gold & Silver for  in the Mixed 10m Air Rifle!
    • Italy will raise it to Jury.   Perini's cellphone was in the bag which was kept in the boat. It was not intentional as per him.
    • Giacomo Perini, who originally won bronze in men’s PR1 single sculls, were found to be using communication equipment during the final and has been excluded from the event (ranked dead last) 
    • And last but not least, American gold for the women.  
    • Incredible drama though, with a huge last 200m charge from ! 
    • Oksana Zubkovska just won her 5th consecutive gold in women's long jump at the age of 41. She's just fenomenal woman, who tried to convince doctors that she is healthy at her junior age. 
    • It might have some advantages, I get that, but it doesn't take away the fact that you simply can't make a remotely fair league standing when teams don't all play each other. There's no way you can compare team A and B on number of points gained when they didn't play the same teams (and/or each other)...
    • I'm as traditional and anti-Super League as anyone you can get, but i'm optimistic about the new format.   For one it's still totally opposite of what the Super League wants to be. We don't have a closed league with 30+ matches in a season and you also depend on the domestic leagues to qualify.    Also, as good as the old group stage format was, the last few years it became very double sided in my view. In the 2000s and early 2010s it was much more interesting, when the teams were more equal in strength and surprises happened. But in the past few years, with all the money involved the gap is widening between the elite 10 teams and the rest.    And we usually got 2-3 really strong groups, where some teams got screwed and then we had 5 rather easy groups, with the big teams there had a cruise to the knockout stage, where after 3 matches it was virtually known what the final standing will be.   Now in the new format, where the knockout bracket is fixed by the positions in the league, there will be intrigue till the end i reckon. Plus with only 1 match between teams, there is a higher chance for a smaller team to upset a bigger one. If you have Man City - Sparta in 2 matches, you definitely know City are winning at minimum 1 of them. But in only 1 round, if they miss to beat Sparta, then lose to team 2 and have another draw with a smaller team, then their position in the table is affected much more serious.   I also really like, that after the league phase, we don't get teams dropping to the lower competitions. I have enough of teams like Barcelona or Man Utd phoning and moaning, when they drop to the Europa League. If you don't make the knockouts you are out, done..   The one thing i definitely don't like about the switch is that they gave 2 of the extra spots again to the top Nations with this bogus "best country coef. in a year" spot. They should have given them to the Q nations. The top 5 leagues have enough teams already. 
×
×
  • Create New...