website statistics
Jump to content

Team GB Daily: Day 2


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Olympicsnell said:

Rosie eccles just got fucked in the boxing, excuse me language, that is a joke

I honestly wouldn’t care if they shut our boxing programme down. Corrupt sport. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, G-ann said:

Tense times in the hockey with :GBR women 2-1 down in the 1st quarter 

As tense as a pool game with 4/6 going through can be at least...

for the hockey heads here is there any real chance we don't make the quarters?

As now we come across the world
To share these Games of old
Let all the flags of every land
In brotherhood unfold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mkbw50 said:

As tense as a pool game with 4/6 going through can be at least...

for the hockey heads here is there any real chance we don't make the quarters?

If we don’t win this then yes, should be an easy game for us but losing today won’t bode well. 
 

Pool of:

Argentina 

US

Australia 

Spain 

South Africa 

 

I don’t expect a win against Arg or Aus, US/RSA is 50/50 and today should be a win…!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seen the Eccles scorecards...without seeing the fight, strikes me as rather bizarre that she is deemed to have lost that based on the actual scores. One judge gave it to her 30-26, she wins 2-1 outright on the scores of the 5 judges, with 2 others viewing it as a draw but giving the edge to her opponent -> she loses 3-2 on points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RussB said:

Just seen the Eccles scorecards...without seeing the fight, strikes me as rather bizarre that she is deemed to have lost that based on the actual scores. One judge gave it to her 30-26, she wins 2-1 outright on the scores of the 5 judges, with 2 others viewing it as a draw but giving the edge to her opponent -> she loses 3-2 on points. 

I had that thought as well. It's bizarre that it goes down as a defeat on points, when she literally 'won' on points. Even if they wanted to come to that decision, the logistics of it are weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Epic Failure said:

I had that thought as well. It's bizarre that it goes down as a defeat on points, when she literally 'won' on points. Even if they wanted to come to that decision, the logistics of it are weird.

it's a bad look with the fighter who got a deduction for an infringement winning on draws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Olympicsnell said:

Equestrian team done a extremely good job today, shame we couldnt hold top spot in individual but you'd take it at this point :) within one fault

Its a little frustrating, Laura took the "slow" route from what I could see at the last water section which probably cost her making the time. On the team front its really only France within striking distance but GB lead going into the jumping is very healthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Gold & Silver for  in the Mixed 10m Air Rifle!
    • Italy will raise it to Jury.   Perini's cellphone was in the bag which was kept in the boat. It was not intentional as per him.
    • Giacomo Perini, who originally won bronze in men’s PR1 single sculls, were found to be using communication equipment during the final and has been excluded from the event (ranked dead last) 
    • And last but not least, American gold for the women.  
    • Incredible drama though, with a huge last 200m charge from ! 
    • Oksana Zubkovska just won her 5th consecutive gold in women's long jump at the age of 41. She's just fenomenal woman, who tried to convince doctors that she is healthy at her junior age. 
    • It might have some advantages, I get that, but it doesn't take away the fact that you simply can't make a remotely fair league standing when teams don't all play each other. There's no way you can compare team A and B on number of points gained when they didn't play the same teams (and/or each other)...
    • I'm as traditional and anti-Super League as anyone you can get, but i'm optimistic about the new format.   For one it's still totally opposite of what the Super League wants to be. We don't have a closed league with 30+ matches in a season and you also depend on the domestic leagues to qualify.    Also, as good as the old group stage format was, the last few years it became very double sided in my view. In the 2000s and early 2010s it was much more interesting, when the teams were more equal in strength and surprises happened. But in the past few years, with all the money involved the gap is widening between the elite 10 teams and the rest.    And we usually got 2-3 really strong groups, where some teams got screwed and then we had 5 rather easy groups, with the big teams there had a cruise to the knockout stage, where after 3 matches it was virtually known what the final standing will be.   Now in the new format, where the knockout bracket is fixed by the positions in the league, there will be intrigue till the end i reckon. Plus with only 1 match between teams, there is a higher chance for a smaller team to upset a bigger one. If you have Man City - Sparta in 2 matches, you definitely know City are winning at minimum 1 of them. But in only 1 round, if they miss to beat Sparta, then lose to team 2 and have another draw with a smaller team, then their position in the table is affected much more serious.   I also really like, that after the league phase, we don't get teams dropping to the lower competitions. I have enough of teams like Barcelona or Man Utd phoning and moaning, when they drop to the Europa League. If you don't make the knockouts you are out, done..   The one thing i definitely don't like about the switch is that they gave 2 of the extra spots again to the top Nations with this bogus "best country coef. in a year" spot. They should have given them to the Q nations. The top 5 leagues have enough teams already. 
×
×
  • Create New...