yeah, I saw the match on the Czech TV (delayed replay, not live, of course) and it was really funny, to say the least...
I must admit I've never seen anything like that (never read about the VHL episode earlier this year)...and I also never thought it was possible...
so, it's never too late to learn something new...
p.s. by the way, I also found this:
"According to the official IIHF rule guidebook, here is how referees are instructed to handle two (or more) penalty shots awarded on the same play:
“If the referee signals a penalty shot, and before the play is whistled because of a goal or to call the penalty shot another foul is assessed to the same team, the additional penalty will be assessed regardless if the skater scores on either the play or the subsequent penalty shot.” — IIHF Rule 1164 (iv) [IIHF.com]
“Should two penalty shots be awarded to the same team at the same stoppage of play (for two separate fouls), only one goal can be scored. Should the first penalty shot result in a goal, the second penalty shot is automatically cancelled, but the appropriate penalty is assessed for the second infraction. If the first shot is unsuccessful, the second shot is taken. The order of the penalty shots will be decided by the order of the infractions during game action.” — IIHF Rule 1169 (vi) [IIHF.com]
Essentially, because Lehmann was fouled by Samorukov but still maintained possession of the puck, play was allowed to continue. Samorukov taking Lehmann down a second time, on the same play, warranted a second penalty shot — but Switzerland would only have one goal count, regardless.
It didn’t really matter, because Switzerland didn’t score on either penalty shot."
p.s. @Dmitry thanks for the info about the previous "double penalty shot" episode...
p.p.s. personally, I think it's a very weird rule...imho, they should go with a penalty shot for the first infraction and then 2-min penalties for every subsequent foul...
2 shots (of which only 1 would count anyway) are just senseless to me...