website statistics
Jump to content

dcro

Totallympics Grand Master
  • Posts

    28,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    259

 Content Type 

Forums

Events

Totallympics International Song Contest

Totallympics News

Qualification Tracker

Test

Published Articles

Everything posted by dcro

  1. Well, good thing I only tuned in for the final then.
  2. Our team is doing a fine job so far. Too bad this doesn't count for Olympic qualification.
  3. The Last Emperor is quite fascinating.
  4. Canada will be able to send one individual. Lamaze not getting selected would be surprising.
  5. Here it is. Argentina gets a team (what a joy this must be for them), while Canada gets an individual spot instead... I just can't believe Canada will only have a dressage team. It's the complete opposite from Rio.
  6. Finally some good results for Mathilda Karlsson... She overtakes Thailand, but is still well behind Hong Kong. Hong Kong riders still don't have MER though, so there may be some hope yet.
  7. You clearly meant to say ...0 here.
  8. Story on Brazil losing their dressage team It's like I suspected all along. What a bunch of amateurs! Brazil had a long tradition of hosting 3* events, and this year they for whatever reason downgraded them to 2* events. It's the purest form of ignorance.
  9. I wonder what would our South American collegues have to say about these dishes.
  10. Yeah, unless Ukraine ends up losing their team slot. What will happen then? Czech Republic would get a team, while Ukraine would get an individual slot instead of whoever finishes 2nd in Group C...
  11. Yeah, unless Ukraine ends up losing their team slot.
  12. Omer Karaevli failed to obtain any points in A Coruna. Since he is not entered for any competition next week, his hopes are likely gone.
  13. Henttinen's knee pretty much turned into spaghetti right now...
  14. Still not the worst counting I've heard this weekend.
  15. Tjon En Fa made the semifinals today. And he is making Glaetzer work really hard.
  16. 1) 2006-2016 is eleven years. Do I need to count again? 2) 2006-2015 would be an arbitrary decade, just like 1916-2015 would be an arbitrary century. But nobody really means arbitrary decades and centuries, they mean calendar decades and centuries. And since there is no Year 0, all decades start at 1 and end at 10 (0). Method you used in the title of the thread suggests that the first decade had only 9 years. End of discussion.
  17. But anyway, this is all fun and well, but there are no 'opinions' and 'arguments' in math. It is what it is.
  18. If Centuries start on zero, then decades also must start on zero (and they do). Otherwise...
  19. Lol, no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. That's 10 numbers - 10 years.
×
×
  • Create New...