MantaRaymarc 75 Posted June 4, 2016 Author #81 Share Posted June 4, 2016 3 hours ago, dcro said: I think it will be DR Congo (sadly for Guinea, they are only 8 points behind DR Congo). Well, Guinea has a greater chance to be selected through Tripartite Commission Invitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,182 Posted June 4, 2016 #82 Share Posted June 4, 2016 5 minutes ago, MantaRaymarc said: Well, Guinea has a greater chance to be selected through Tripartite Commission Invitation. Yes, but this means that Guinea will sadly fail to qualify anyone besides wild cards. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRaymarc 75 Posted June 5, 2016 Author #83 Share Posted June 5, 2016 22 hours ago, dcro said: IJF finally made their final OQ checks. https://www.judobase.org/#/wrl/1/ogq/0 Some changes: -They finally removed ineligible Curacao and gave the quota to Bolivia -Congo lost their quota in -100, but gained it in +100 -Mali got Congo's -100 quota -Uzbekistan officially received the unused Oceania's quota, in men's -100 Uzbekistan earned two invitational spots? I thought the unused quota will be handed over to one of the unqualified nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,182 Posted June 5, 2016 #84 Share Posted June 5, 2016 3 hours ago, MantaRaymarc said: Uzbekistan earned two invitational spots? I thought the unused quota will be handed over to one of the unqualified nations. Well it's not invitational spot. Reallocation rules say that unused quotas are going to the highest ranked athlete not already qualified (respecting max 1 per NOC per event rule). When you click at "men" ranking here you'll see that Uzbekistani guy in -100kg was the highest ranked athlete. https://www.judobase.org/#/wrl/m/ogq #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRaymarc 75 Posted June 5, 2016 Author #85 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Just now, dcro said: Well it's not invitational spot. Reallocation rules say that unused quotas are going to the highest ranked athlete not already qualified (respecting max 1 per NOC per event rule). When you click at "men" ranking here you'll see that Uzbekistani guy in -100kg was the highest ranked athlete. https://www.judobase.org/#/wrl/m/ogq So any NOC can add more athletes in a weight category that they haven't qualified yet, as long as the maximum number of quotas has reached. Am I right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,182 Posted June 5, 2016 #86 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Just now, MantaRaymarc said: So any NOC can add more athletes in a weight category that they haven't qualified yet, as long as the maximum number of quotas has reached. Am I right? Yes, potentially unused tripartite quotas will be reallocated in the same way. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MantaRaymarc 75 Posted June 5, 2016 Author #87 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Just now, dcro said: Yes, potentially unused tripartite quotas will be reallocated in the same way. So if the tripartite invitational places are lacking to fulfill its allocation, who will succeed Soyib Kurbanov of Uzbekistan in retrieving unused places? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,182 Posted June 5, 2016 #88 Share Posted June 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, MantaRaymarc said: So if the tripartite invitational places are lacking to fulfill its allocation, who will succeed Soyib Kurbanov of Uzbekistan in retrieving unused places? These are the first three: Valentina Moscatt (ITA) - 832 points in women's -48 Ilse Heylen (BEL) - 831 points in women's -52 Liu Yang (CHN) - 795 points in women's -57 Uzbekistan received quota in men's -100kg, because Oceania didn't use one of the men's quota. On the other hand, during possible tripartite reallocation both men's and women's rankings are being looked. MantaRaymarc 1 #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hckošice 13,267 Posted June 11, 2016 #89 Share Posted June 11, 2016 Updated as of June 11th, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcro 10,182 Posted June 16, 2016 #90 Share Posted June 16, 2016 Still clueless about those 20 wild cards... Don't get what's taking so long. #banbestmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now