website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Biathlon 2016 - 2017 Discussion Thread


hckošice

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Xander said:

Uhuh. Abramova is also in a good age ;) The age means nothing in his case. He had to train somewhere with the team in order to get the needed loads and recovery. He needed competition experience, because everyone needs constant practice. If he doesn't need all of that it's unnatural imo :wacko:

Not everyone needs to constantly train and compete with team mates, there's always athletes who do fine on their own and with 1-2 competitions get things going again :p 

 

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather not see Loginov and Starykh at all and definitely don't like seeing them on podiums, but especially in Loginov's case I can pretty easily accept that his current performances aren't specifically suspicious. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67163
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Not everyone needs to constantly train and compete with team mates, there's always athletes who do fine on their own and with 1-2 competitions get things going again :p 

 

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather not see Loginov and Starykh at all and definitely don't like seeing them on podiums, but especially in Loginov's case I can pretty easily accept that his current performances aren't specifically suspicious. 

 

Isn't it like when someone takes EPO that his body simply remains doped even if he/she stops using it? At least to some extent.

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67164
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

Isn't it like when someone takes EPO that his body simply remains doped even if he/she stops using it? At least to some extent.

 

Not forever I think, but it might still give some advantage. On the other hand it's usually also not like EPO turns a mediocre athlete into a superstar, so it's definitely reasonable to believe Loginov is actually a talented athlete :p 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67165
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

Not forever I think, but it might still give some advantage. On the other hand it's usually also not like EPO turns a mediocre athlete into a superstar, so it's definitely reasonable to believe Loginov is actually a talented athlete :p 

 

Just like Starykh. :p

#banbestmen

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67167
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

there's always athletes who do fine on their own and with 1-2 competitions get things going again :p

Such athletes should receive a 4 years ban :whistle:

 

50 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Don't get me wrong, I'd rather not see Loginov and Starykh at all and definitely don't like seeing them on podiums, but especially in Loginov's case I can pretty easily accept that his current performances aren't specifically suspicious. 

He could have taken a silver medal in the Antholz individual race with such results! Or 7th-8th in the Ruhpolding sprint. Not suspicious? :p Exactly the same course time from leaders btw like in his last season.

Both didn't even admit their guilt, moreover Starykh kept lying that she doesn't know how it appeared in her system. It will stay forever suspicious to me :mumble:

Edited by Xander
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67169
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Xander said:

Such athletes should receive a 4 years ban :whistle:

 

He could have taken a silver medal in the Antholz individual race with such results! Or 7th-8th in the Ruhpolding sprint. Not suspicious? :p Exactly the same course time from leaders btw like in his last season.

Both didn't even admit their guilt, moreover Starykh kept lying that she doesn't know how it appeared in her system. It will stay forever suspicious to me :mumble:

 

With his shooting? Because it's not exactly fair to compare skiing times from one track with another :p 

 

And yes, I agree about 4 year bans for doping use. 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67171
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

With his shooting? Because it's not exactly fair to compare skiing times from one track with another :p 

 

And yes, I agree about 4 year bans for doping use. 

Actually it's fair when you compare to same people esp if they have the same dynamics.

 

 

ps. Now it appeared that he trained with the team at the official venues (I was right! He had to train with the team) all this time and even kept receiving a national stipend whle being banned. What an interesting "ban".

Abramova was temporary suspended (not banned) and she was denied all of that. I hate him even more now :lol:

 

ps. Woohoo! We've got the new team doctor & Abramova is taking allowed substitude/meds now. I hope she left that Moscow doctor for good.

Edited by Xander
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67172
Share on other sites

Really nice result for Drndic. 34/100 is very good. She could be best ever female athlete from Serbia :) We will see for few years :d

Edited by dareza
Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67225
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, dareza said:

She could be best ever female athlete from Serbia :) 

 

I'm not very familiar with the history of Serbian biathlon, but isn't it possible she already is Serbia's best ever female athlete? :d 

 

I know she's of course no Milanko Petrovic or something yet, but I really can't think of any female biathlete from Serbia (apart from Sinanovic, Hasimovic, Zekic etc, who lose about an hour in a 20 minute race as a matter of speech) :p 

 

And what makes Drndic even more impressive: it's not like she got a good result purely from good shooting...she also had the 31st skiing time! 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67228
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

I'm not very familiar with the history of Serbian biathlon, but isn't it possible she already is Serbia's best ever female athlete? :d 

 

I know she's of course no Milanko Petrovic or something yet, but I really can't think of any female biathlete from Serbia (apart from Sinanovic, Hasimovic, Zekic etc, who lose about an hour in a 20 minute race as a matter of speech) :p 

 

And what makes Drndic even more impressive: it's not like she got a good result purely from good shooting...she also had the 31st skiing time! 

 

well, you are right :lol:

 

I hope for top 30 in sprint now :d

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/374-biathlon-2016-2017-discussion-thread/page/88/#findComment-67229
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I would say they will not be eligible. But it realy abotut the wording every federation has in its papers. World Aquatics changes their policies several times (especially after Mazepin "solved the issues" persoanlly - as witnessed one russian Olympic champion)   Inoirtnat notes on FIS decisions:   FIS points are frozen for ruissns and belorussians - so the situation is not so complicated for a lot of them. The list of the AIN`s is not final as the list from ISU was. It means that persons mau be not only removed from the list but added as well. I expect russians to try some freestyle applications before the stage in China, for example. FIS has not problems with the deny of visa or entris by the host countries. So they kept the possibility to close the doors for the russians for all the countries as ICF did. No sanctions for this, no removing events from the Olympic qualification list, no host changes,   * * * * * Here is the the relevant extract from FIS papers for Aerials tram event. What do you think?
    • Not only Korostelev but all 3 russian entries. I will bring the detail 
    • And will bet that the IBU is a lot richer than the FIS because their wealth is based on German TV contracts.  
    • Russians filed an appeal to CAS against IBU. But I do not believe they will get any result in time to grab quotas. I suppose IBU will not agree to have "fast" hearings as FIS did. And i suppose IBU will fight in CAS without intention to lose as FIS did.
    • hmm - aren't Australia and New Zealand the only nations that actually compete in the Oceania Cup?
    • If Australia and New Zealand earn quotas through Pro League, then does that mean 3rd placed team from Oceania Cup takes quota? 
    • Right now russians themselves metioned that they have 2 main options for women`s quota: - Peklecova will was not included into the international doping testing pool (RUSADA is still incompliant after that scandal) - D.Nepryaeva had training camps at the occupied territories - it is the best way to avoid of the international doping testing at all     P.S. Little detail - according to Vaelbe 90% of russian skiera are contracted with russian army or other security services.
    • We had no real problems with russians for a long time. It was a normal sport rivalry. It was common case that statues of russian politicians and poets remained in place even in the Western Ukraine which was joined by the Soviet Union much later. Lyskun was pro-Ukrainian according to her statement but she kept conctcts with her former coach. That coach moved to russia earlier and could do some brainwashing. I would say that the coach may have financial motivation to do this. By the way we had similar case with Bondar from Luhansk who moved to russia in 2014. What is really interesting - russians have a lot of resources but it took them 4 yeats to find someone relatively well-known in sport area to stage this propaganda performance.       Yes, this web-site is active and maintained. The list is beeing updated. But it is not an official goverment resource and it is operated by the non-goverment organization. It was created to draw attention of the national security services to the activities of some people and provide some initial foundations for further formal investigations.
    • AIN's will skipped (they got American visa too late) 2nd WC stage (but their could compete in 3rd WC stage) and, therefore, their chances to got more than 1 entry in OG have become lower, especially,  if their will not allow to compete in Sigulda (but after their participation in Poland's short-track WT stage, I won't give 100% chances for that).   Maybe problem with entries will be solved by itself)
×
×
  • Create New...