website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Team GB at the World Athletics Championships


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Grassmarket said:

Ultimately the important thing that determines DL qualification, sponsorship, UK Athletics funding etc etc is going to be individual rankings so.....

Don't disagree, but equally, many of the athletes in the GB are specifically funded as relay athletes - because, with no disrespect to them, they are unlikely to medal individually - but have decent shout at securing a relay medal.

 

And, without wishing to sound like the doom-monger who used to spam every thread with nonsense talk of funding cuts, the funding available to UK Athletics is ultimately driven by results and in that respect, getting a bronze in the relay is probably worth more than 1, 2 or 3 individuals getting to the semi-finals and then crashing out. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-698845
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rafa Maciel said:

Don't disagree, but equally, many of the athletes in the GB are specifically funded as relay athletes - because, with no disrespect to them, they are unlikely to medal individually - but have decent shout at securing a relay medal.

 

And, without wishing to sound like the doom-monger who used to spam every thread with nonsense talk of funding cuts, the funding available to UK Athletics is ultimately driven by results and in that respect, getting a bronze in the relay is probably worth more than 1, 2 or 3 individuals getting to the semi-finals and then crashing out. 

The only 2 athletes on relay funding that didn't run in the relay are Vicki O and Reardon. Anning, MHS and Dobson are on individual funding. YMJ is on potential relay funding but ran in the heat obv. 

 

Also, the UK funding is done on an annual level and there are weird rules as to how many athletes can be on which level, and whether you can change levels. So I wouldn't read as much into the specifics on that for any more than a guide. It's as much about making yourself available for things like World Relays.  

 

Finally, the UK sport funding is done on the Olympic cycle. So, arguably, the decision about what happens in a WC matters far less to that. They may still take into account WC performance, but there will be another WC before LA and it is entirely possible that we medal in the mixed relay there. 

 

I'm sure that the athletes and coaches have had many a discussion. And maybe they made a collective decision to focus on the individual here. It would hardly be an absurd choice. 

 

On the subject of hurdlers - Newnham aside - none of the others have done anything to suggest that they would have been better options than those who ran. So really it comes down to whether you think that Reardon and Ohurougu should have been in there. And, for me, Vicki has never shown herself to be a comfortable relay runner, especially as she would have been in traffic due to the set nature of the mixed relay. She usually leads off if she does the relay at all. And I'm not going to begrudge Reardon being given the chance of seeing what his first major individual champs looks like. 

 

If the focus is *just* maximising medals, sure, it probably was a poor choice.

 

If at least part of it is helping to maximise the future potential of athletes, I have no problem with the decisions made. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-698851
Share on other sites

On 9/13/2025 at 12:06 PM, chargundam said:

Yep I see the complaints about usa and teamgb kits being a bit too similar have a good point🤣

am i going insane, but some of GB are running in a (much nicer) white jersey. e.g josh kerr

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-698916
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Olympicsnell said:

am i going insane, but some of GB are running in a (much nicer) white jersey. e.g josh kerr

 

 

I've heard that there's choices for them to pick between. But I can't confirm that

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-698917
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, chargundam said:

I've heard that there's choices for them to pick between. But I can't confirm that

They do have choices. Muir and a few others have chosen the more traditional white. 

 

Gutting for Molly. She was definitely one of our better individual medal hopes. 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-698933
Share on other sites

Can finally watch this after being at footy on Saturday and a card game tournament on Sunday

Hopefully our team do better than me (one win, one draw, three losses)

As now we come across the world
To share these Games of old
Let all the flags of every land
In brotherhood unfold

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-699041
Share on other sites

Big day because after going to :ESP I can finally sit on my arse for the whole session and just watch athletics

As now we come across the world
To share these Games of old
Let all the flags of every land
In brotherhood unfold

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/21950-team-gb-at-the-world-athletics-championships/page/4/#findComment-699982
Share on other sites

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
    • The rankings look likely to give two spots each in the men's side to Egypt (2nd athlete at 3) and GB (second athlete at 9). the nearest contender after that is France and both Egypt and GB have plenty of contenders after their respective number 2 but before France's umber 2   Women's side looks a bit more of a battle, with Egypt again likely to provide 2, and then a fight between USA, GBR and BEL for the other lucky double spot. That said, so dominant are the Egyptians, Americans and Brits, that failing to find all the contenders in the top 50 is entirely plausible, possibly opening a third 'double' spot.
    • I'd done my final revisions on my prediction spreadsheets.. and I'm sticking with 26 for Canada.    Take it to the bank! (But don't sign anything)
×
×
  • Create New...