[prof87 3]

vor 3 Minuten schrieb dcro:

What? It doesn't matter how Australia qualified in women's singles. That quota still needs to be reallocated at the end. First it will go to New Zealand, and if they refuse to Nigeria.

 

It seems to me that it does matter, because of the following facts:

 

34 Single Places (including the 5 Continental Representation Places)

+ 1 x Host Country Place (HC)

+ 3 x Unused Athlet Quota Places from Doubles (UAQ)

+ 3 x Reallocation of Unused Tripartite Commission Invitation Places (RUT)

 

Place 1-32 (including Continental Representation of Asia, Europe, America)

(without following the Continental Representation)/with Continental Representation

(33) UAQ - - Sabrina Jaquet

(34) UAQ - - Chlor Magee

(UAQ) UAQ - - Telma Santos

(UAQ) AFR - - Kate Foo Kune (Continental Representation of Africa)

(UAQ) RUT - - Kati Tolmoff

(HC) HC - - Lohaynny Vicente

(RUT) RUT - - Laura Sarosi

(RUT) AUS - - Hsuan-Yu Wendy Chen (Continental Representation of Australia)

(RUT) RUT - - Akvile Stapusaityte

 

so no place open, correct me if I'm wrong

[prof87 3]

vor 11 Minuten schrieb dcro:

 

Okay, so it will go to Nigeria then.

 

...or lets say to no one

[prof87 3]

vor 4 Stunden schrieb mrv86:

BWF announced Australia picked its men's and mixed pairs to compete in Rio (source), meaning both single spots were offered to New Zealan. If I interpret correctly the nomination criteria, NZL might not select them, and as there is no other player from Oceania that satisfy the minimum criteria for participation in Rio, those place could end going to Mexico (in men) and the Netherlands (in women).

 

just a little correction on that one

 

Zitat

....As there were no Tripartite places taken up in Women’s Singles, the highest Oceania representative (No.74 Hsuan-Yu Wendy Chen) qualified on ranking (source)

 

that means just the reallocation of the mens single quota place