website statistics
Jump to content

JoshMartini007

Totallympics Superstar
  • Posts

    5,733
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Forums

Events

Totallympics International Song Contest

Totallympics News

Qualification Tracker

Test

Published Articles

Everything posted by JoshMartini007

  1. I'd argue selecting one of our NHL teams would make Canada weaker overall . Though they would have the advantage of having team synergy vs. hoping everyone gels together by the fourth game...
  2. Pretty much, Europe only gets 3 individual quotas on top of what they qualify in the team events, which is typically 3-5 spots. With taking at least an individual quota it doesn't leave a lot of room for the other nations.
  3. Until the IOC can get its act together and bring back the missing 1000-1500 athletes (or start removing sports) it might be best for fencing to drop the team events. Honestly, events with less than 10 entrants should not be happening
  4. I feel very confident Canada will finish in the top 4, they would have to lose 5/6 games for them to fail, the issue is top 3. We've got Mexico out of the way, but losing to Central American teams is sort of our jam. For example, Honduras has no chance at qualifying, but they can just as easily beat us and deny us three valuable points.
  5. Avoiding CONMEBOL is huge for Canada's chances, obviously I'm hoping we finish in the top 3 to avoid it altogether, but it's nice to have a viable back-up plan. I'm very sad one of Italy or Portugal will miss the World Cup.
  6. Wouldn't be the first time a sport federation doesn't know its own rules/changes them without telling anyone
  7. To be fair, most of our players are also not use to playing in those conditions. With that said, any kind of result against Mexico will be big for Canada. We are already in a very good position to at least qualify to the inter-continental match
  8. It also doesn't help that due to seeding, will all be encouraged to score more in order to have a high goal differential.
  9. While removing the riding portion may make the sport more accessible, adding cycling is a poor choice as it doesn't have much military roots plus as others have mentioned, it would bring the sport too close to triathlon. Something along the lines of archery or a hand-to-hand combat sport (wrestling?) would be more applicable.
  10. There's more to the year than just the Olympics.
  11. Not a huge fan of this, they should have more core sports. At the very least they need to have some kind of list of approved events or else we'll get random sports/events where only a handful of nations are decent at.
  12. I don't think the NHL was too hesitant to try and break into the Chinese market
  13. This is a new favourite translation for shot put.
  14. Looks like Canada is back to hating gold medals
  15. Won't be the first time, won't be the last time someone said something is unsafe, but still does it. It's all talk.
  16. Pretty much, at best the government might protest by not allowing their officials/diplomats from attending the opening ceremony.
  17. Yeah, ranking qualification forces athletes to participate in 10+ events which can lock out some athletes who have little investments and a lot of them can be manipulated to the point where some rankings are horrible in predicting who is actually the best. While I accept that in some sports, rankings will always be there, I do wish that in all sports there is at least one opportunity to allow athletes for direct qualification.
  18. Last week we looked at the event changes between the 2020 and the 2024 Summer Olympic Games. The other notable change ahead of those games will be the number of athletes competing. Totallympics takes a closer look. Using the qualification documents, the 2020 Olympics had an expected athlete quota of 11,114 (the final number was higher due to some sports having more athletes than expected qualify and the IOC allowing more athletes to compete at the games due to COVID-19, court appeals and via the refugee team). The 2024 Olympics is set to have a total of 10,500 athletes, a decrease of 614 quotas. As baseball/softball and karate were not selected as host selected sports, the athlete quotas were completely removed. This saw a reduction of 234 and 80 quotas respectively. However, with the other host selected sports seeing an increase in athlete quotas, this reduction had a net effect of -242. The remaining 72 quotas were split between the four sports with breaking getting the most quotas (32 athletes) as the sport is set to make its Olympic debut. Sport climbing, the only returning sport to get an increase in its total events sees a notable increase of 28 athletes while skateboarding and surfing will see increases of 8 and 4 respectively. Of the 28 core sports, all of them either saw them maintaining their 2020 quotas or saw an overall decrease. Cycling is a bit unique as while the overall sport saw a decrease of quotas (-14 athletes), the BMX freestyle (+6) and track cycling (+1) disciplines saw an increase of athletes, but were offset by a decrease in mountain biking (-4) and road cycling (-17). Among the core sports, athletics will experience the largest decrease with 90 fewer athletes expected to attend the 2024 games. Due to the removal of four events, weightlifting also has a significant decrease with 76 fewer athletes while aquatics rounds out the top 3 with 62 fewer athletes (-8 in artistic swimming, -6 in open water swimming, -26 in swimming and -22 in water polo). A summary of the quota changes can be seen in the table below. Of the sports which lost athlete quotas most of them only saw losses of less than 6% of their total quotas from 2020. The two exceptions were boxing and weightlifting. Both sports have recently lost favour in the eyes of the IOC. Even after adjusting weightlifting having fewer events, both sports will experience a decrease of over 10% of their 2020 total. While these athlete quota cuts were made by the IOC as a cost saving measure, they remain quite controversial. Detractors argue that it is not in the spirit of the Olympics and that it would make nations with smaller teams even smaller. What do you think, is the cost saving measures a necessary evil or are there other ways the IOC could cut costs?
  19. OTP also takes into account athletes with potential so while diving had a poor Olympics, they're still one of the strongest teams for Canada, especially now that the men are on an upswing. They may suffer cuts because they were getting a lot of money for a relatively small team, but I don't see it being a whole lot. Tennis is an interesting sport where most of the money goes to training young players rather than going to our top players. Golf is sort of in the same boat. OTP's mission is to increase the medal count at the Olympics so in that way I can see those sports receiving less funding, but if they want to encourage/inspire people to take up sport, I can see why they may keep the funding.
  20. I don't understand why the IOC just doesn't take over weightlifting like it did for boxing.
  21. Do we have enough talent to justify a third sprint women? Will the sprint team be three people? I guess at that point the 14th quota probably doesn't have much of a chance at winning a medal (unless they can convince Michael Woods to compete in the road race) so it may go to whoever is having a good season.
  22. Is there a list per nation anywhere or did you only get Canada's quotas? Yeah, the athlete quota is very tight at the Commonwealth Games
  23. Really? I just saw a date for the world championships. This is what happens when you have competing federations.
  24. The IOC recognizes WDSF and they were the ones which organized the Youth Olympics events.
×
×
  • Create New...