website statistics
Jump to content

Shooting Qualification for Summer Olympic Games 2016


MantaRaymarc
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

If I'm not mistaken, Moldova is not a nation that can receive these wildcards, because they had too many athletes at the previous Olympics. I'm guessing that means for 2020 you'll have to qualify 100% based on the qualifying criteria for winning a quota..

 

On the good side, welcome to Totallympics :) 

 

At the last Olympic Games from Moldova I was always only one athlete....And Moldova gave request to the wild card.But now haven't anwsered(((

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

They can still receive a reallocated quota (which can go to any unqualified nation in shooting).

This depends on any nation declining a quota (in this case in women's 10m air rifle), no matter if it's a nation that won a quota place or a nation that got a tripartite place, right? 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 минуты назад, heywoodu сказал:

This depends on any nation declining a quota (in this case in women's 10m air rifle), no matter if it's a nation that won a quota place or a nation that got a tripartite place, right? 

Can you say me , what it this A TRIPARTITE PLACE????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

This depends on any nation declining a quota (in this case in women's 10m air rifle), no matter if it's a nation that won a quota place or a nation that got a tripartite place, right? 

 

There are around 30 unused quotas in shooting. Only a handful of them will go to Tripartite nations (depending on who applied), and most of the remaining quotas will go to unqualified nations who have MQS. Belgium, Lithuania and Ireland for example received a reallocated quota in 2012, and they are most certainly not Tripartite nations.

Edited by dcro

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 минуту назад, dcro сказал:

 

There are around 30 unused quotas in shooting. Only a handful of them will go to Tripartite nations (depending on who applied), and most of the remaining quotas will go to unqualified nations who have MQS. Belgium, Lithuania and Ireland for example received a reallocated quota in 2012, and they are most certainly not Tripartite nations.

I understand you - thank you very much.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RaileanuEcaterina said:

Can you say me , what it this A TRIPARTITE PLACE????

 

Those are wild cards, as far as I know only for nations that had 8 or less (individual!) athletes at the previous two Summer Olympics. Which is why you see countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan and Andorra receive those wild cards/tripartite places. 

 

If I'm wrong, I'm sure dcro will correct me :p 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dcro said:

 

There are around 30 unused quotas in shooting. Only a handful of them will go to Tripartite nations (depending on who applied), and most of the remaining quotas will go to unqualified nations who have MQS. Belgium, Lithuania and Ireland for example received a reallocated quota in 2012, and they are most certainly not Tripartite nations.

 

That could make things interesting for our newest Totallympics member then :mumble:

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

 

Those are wild cards, as far as I know only for nations that had 8 or less (individual!) athletes at the previous two Summer Olympics. Which is why you see countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan and Andorra receive those wild cards/tripartite places. 

 

If I'm wrong, I'm sure dcro will correct me :p 

 

You are right. :p

#banbestmen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I read now that Valentina Rodini will be in the new team of Tizzano + Galtarossa and Martini. I was probably in such an information bubble on Instagram that I thought that only Abbagnale was running a campaign and had a team of people around him. That's why I was surprised by his defeat + the fact that, for example, Rodini supports his rival. But as I wrote, for me the change in the general coach position is a plus. We need a new opening and a new impulse: Cattaneo had his best results in Tokyo and then he only explained that his rowers were running away abroad to the USA to study and that's why he had worse results. Ok, except that it's the same in Romania and Greece but they results are comparable or better. It's obvious that no one here will make the UK or the Netherlands, because we don't have such resources and money but I think we can repeat the Romanian results (2 gold - 3 silver in Paris) and that will be a much better result than the 2 silver in this year.
    • Abbagnale boasted that he had 80 per cent a few days before the vote (I still have the screen) and ran again as a result of a power deal. Not a great loss.   I have doubts about the new technical director though, you can't announce him during the congress, brandishing the scalp of the Abbagnale era technical staff (who then, were Crispi's men). Let's hope there are no rifts between the new staff and the athletes, it had to be handled better.
    • I was surprised by Abbagnale's defeat. I thought he was a sure of victory, since he decided to run - I read some source that he didn't know if he would start before Paris 2024. What do you think about it?
    • Rugby Sevens WR SVNS 2024 - 2025   Multi-Stage Event - 30 November 2024 - 4 May 2025     Official Website Programme Results System Facebook Page Discussion Thread
    • Cattaneo was good but his peak was in Tokyo 2021. Then there was such stabilization - stagnation. In Paris the result was in line with expectations but without the wow effect. They threw everything that was best into the quadruple sculls and it was enough for a only silver. Now without the lightweight sculls in LA I think that radical changes are needed to remain competitive. Previously there was a 3-year Olympic cycle due to Covid, so big changes weren`t good but now I think the time is right. Although of course more funds are needed for this sport in Italy, because even the best coach will not overcome this vel our men`s alpine skiing sector
    • @Gianlu33 we posted the same (great) news at the same time  
    • Davide Tizzano (1996 Olympic Champion, men's double sculls) is the new President of the Italian Federation, as he defeated the (now former) President Giuseppe Abbagnale by a very small margin (52% to 48%) in last week's federal elections   and he's already at work to make up for the last 8 disappointing years (at least in terms of Olympic success): his first move is bringing back home  Antonio Colamonaci  who made  great in the past 8 years   https://www.oasport.it/2024/11/canottaggio-cambia-la-direzione-tecnica-dellitalia-arriva-il-guru-che-ha-reso-grande-la-romania/   let's see if he can make  great again, now 
    • Big news   https://www.oasport.it/2024/11/canottaggio-cambia-la-direzione-tecnica-dellitalia-arriva-il-guru-che-ha-reso-grande-la-romania/
    • Weekly update about the podiums in the 24/25 winter season     This week we'll have a grand total of 49 (!) events in 10 sports.
    • Aleksandra Kałucka has moved full-time to Edinburgh (Scotland) where she will study mathematics
×
×
  • Create New...