I think it’s standard procedure to not publish now until someone is suspended. As he appealed against a provisional suspension it wasn’t revealed until it was all resolved.
Jannik Sinner tested positive twice for banned substance clostebol.
Testing agencies didn't publish his doping results to public.
Tribunal ruled that cream used on his cut caused contamination.
He has been cleared of the dopings.
Of those:
I have no justification for Lacrosse or Flag Football.
If Cricket isn't popular enough to justify being in the Olympic then we have to cut most sports from the Olympics.
The main justifications I can see for Baseball not being deserving of an Olympic spot is that the women's game is extremely underdeveloped (to the point that Softball is substituted as a women's version) and that the top pros have never taken part in the Olympics. But Baseball is one of the most developed and competitive team sport in the world on the men's side. It definitively dwarfs exisitng Olympic team sports like Water Polo, Handball and Field Hockey.
The main reason I think breaking being in the Olympics would make sense as a permanent inclusion is that it's dirt cheap to host - very few athletes, relatively few officials, very easy to produce for TV and re-using an exisitng venue. It really doesn't need to have very much appeal to be worth it.
I actually think is going to be favourites to win both the men's and women's events
The format at the Olympics is sixes, which isn't the same as the traditional outdoor lacrosse format. It has a lot of elements that make it more similar to box lacrosse (an indoor version of lacrosse played on a pitch the size of an ice hockey rink), and that's a version of the game Canada absolutely dominated.
...but ya, and are almost locks for the gold medal game in both the men's and women's event. If the Haudenosaunee are allowed to compete then there is a real chance there could be a North American sweep in the men's event.
Where I personally draw the line would be including sports that *can* be played on ice or snow, as long as they actually are played on ice or snow at the Winter Olympics.
So I would be in favour of cross country running or cyclocross as long as a large part of the playing field for both is covered in snow and part of the challenge includes navigating winter conditions. Also why I'm in favour of snow volleyball being considered.
(I'm also a big fan of including ice climbing in the winter Olympics, but I think that's a less controversial idea with regard to it being a "real" winter sport)
Love to see him lose his Australian passport. I hate this stuff. He should surrender his Australian citizenship if he was an honest man.
Looks like he had been planning this for a while but as too gutless to say so before the Olympics as he may have been deselected
Part honey trap. part money. GB track cycling has a big budget, Australia not so much