website statistics
Jump to content

2024 Olympics - Day 8 (August 3)


 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Josh said:

I agree. There’s absolutely no way we’re winning over 28-29 (I believe that was his projection?), unless one or two of Warner/FAA medaled today and the women’s soccer advanced to the medal rounds. 

I said 27-28

It's more an indication that our conversion rate in the first half was probably at the high end... it tends to level out over time, so the second half may not be as kind

That's also assuming my projections are accurate, and not just an exercise in my willingness to be wrong publicly :d
 

Edited by JockCartier
Clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Josh said:

I agree. There’s absolutely no way we’re winning over 28-29 (I believe that was his projection?), unless one or two of Warner/FAA medaled today and the women’s soccer advanced to the medal rounds. 

I was lol-ing at the decimal, not the prediction.

 

Canada now has 15, but really 16 since Sanford has a guaranteed medal. 11-12 more in the second week is not crazy. We will need some 50/50s to step up though. 

 

It'll be fun (or not) to see if we can break our non-boycott records of 24/7. 

Edited by orangeman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanford is baked in. Katzberg, Rogers and Mitton are good bets in athletics. Breaking and Vincent/Mackenzie in C2 as well. So that's at least six highly likelies. 

Then we have a lot of toss ups too. 3x3, men's basketball, C1, Arop, 4x100, a couple events in track cycling, etc... and a whole mess of minor threats. If the toss ups convert around 50% and one or two of the minor threats pay off, we're there. 

There will be disappointments too of course, but it tends to average out. 

 

Edited by JockCartier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a 50% chance of facing them anyways, but Mel/Brandie draw Kloth/Nuss in the knockout round :facepalm:

 

I much rather would’ve preferred Duda/AP, who have been struggling this season, but oh well… to be among the best you have to beat the best. 

Edited by Josh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JockCartier said:

Sanford is baked in. Katzberg, Rogers and Mitton are good bets in athletics. Breaking and Vincent/Mackenzie in C2 as well. So that's at least six highly likelies. 

Then we have a lot of toss ups too. 3x3, men's basketball, C1, Arop, 4x100, a couple events in track cycling, etc... and a whole mess of minor threats. If the toss ups convert around 50% and one or two of the minor threats pay off, we're there. 

There will be disappointments too of course, but it tends to average out. 

 

I thought Warner was shoe in for a medal before the pole vault, and then disaster struck so…

 

I’d put C1 with Vincent and Jensen with the same medal odds as the C2 IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Yea no. It's not a winter sport. It should not be held on the WOG. If WA wants it so badly, they can drop the steeplechase and add this.
    • Cross country running does not add anything to the Games, it'd be a repeat of the 10k. With basically the same athletes having a shot every 2 years instead of 4. Then they should add short course swimming as well.
    • It's only temporary as the hockey season starts soon and there was not enough time apparently to rebrand.
    • OMG, can't believe there's a North American team whose name doesn't consist of a toponymy and a random plural noun
    • Just create a sub-event and call it "snow cross-country" if that is all it will take for it to be permissible at the Winter Olympics.  
    • Extremely divided opinion.   Public:   Some take it as a fact and justify it under the point that a lot is at stake (not qualifying for the Olympics in hockey = unimaginable national tragedy) so we need the best available regardless where they are gaining their bread, Some (Pro-Kremlin/Pro-Current governement) are super excited, Some (Anti-Kremlin/Anti-our current governement and traditional hockey fans) are sad - some of them have even black screen avatars... but at the end will still watch and cheer, because missing the Olympics with such generation we currently have would be a huge waste and would not be fair... Some (Anti-Kremlin/Anti-our current Governement and casual hockey/sport fans) are shocked and disapprove to the point of considering = calling in medias to boycot the team and the tournament.   Players:   Several players expressed that they do not want to play in the national team as long as there are players from the KHL (there are names we are missing in this roster without more special informations added why, like Cehlárik, Slafkovský, Černák...), Some were some were begged on knees by the coach staff for this tournament (Like Martin Pospíšil, Feherváry or Lantoši... especially Pospíšil last days called he will not play if the KHLers will really be invited... only last night came statement of hime and his brother who is also in the team that they will both came and play for the country... as there is a lot at stake "We did not change our oppinion, but we want to help Slovakia to be at the Olympics... and play there" https://sport.aktuality.sk/hokej/clanok/martin-pospisil-sa-rozhodol-bude-reprezentovat-slovensko-2024081819450673443.   All in all, It is bad. I am seriously worried and afraid, ...no..., I am convinced that now two "camps" will be formed within the team, the pro and anti and seriously, I can´t even imagine how it can work in a TEAM.   I am really afraid. Normally, such roster even without Slaf, Černák, Cehlárik and others missing would very likely win this group, but, who knows what will happen now...
    • Hi, idiot here, cross country running and cyclo cross should ABSOLUTELY be in the winter games but the same 20 odd countries are afraid of opening up their games to outsiders    They have their rule about games being needed to be played on snow and ice but IMO that’s a far more ridiculous idea than allowing cross country running in.     
    • I think you are using a "small" screen. Here is what I see from a 1920px width screen:     I would suggest you to zoom out the whole website (ctrl on your keyboard+wheel on your mouse out, or ctrl on your keyboard+ "-" symbol on your keyboard). I think the website would be optimized for your screen if you set the zoom to 60-80%. Can you try that and let me know?
×
×
  • Create New...