website statistics
Jump to content

AIN athletes qualification for Paris 2024 Olympic Games and reallocation of quotas [post#1 updated 15.07]


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mard0n said:

How maximum 2 quota places through Continental Qualification rule work here? In the qualification system there is no clear definition of the maximum quotas possible to receive through reallocation. Only indicating 4 maximum per NOC. Or I'm wrong?

you're wrong, the reallocation follows the general rule of max 2 athletes per NOC (per gender)

 

up to 4 athletes per NOC (per gender) are only possible when all of them are qualified via World Ranking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Faramir said:

I get why people think it will be reallocated to Chamizo (WCh quota to AZE and then European quota to ITA), but after reading a bit I think it will simply go to the Chinese, as the highest ranked at the WCh who is not yet qualified. The wording imo is quite clear and the same that was used for 2020(1), where for example the reallocation in women's 62kg went directly to ROU (and not to USA who had later won a PanAmerican quota, and thus the next best PanAm wrestler).

 

 

 

no

 

world championships quota are reallocated at the world champs, continental quota through the continental champs and world qualfication tournament's quota through the WQT

 

Wrestling Qualification System.JPG

 

which means that Sidakov's quota must go to :AZE Bayramov and the Azeri's quota must go to next in line in the tournament where Bayramov got the original quota place (= European qualifiers, so :ITA Chamizo)

 

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

 

I think any decent lawyer would easily win any dispute about it in a trial court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, phelps said:

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

Not at all. The rules are the same. This was for Tokyo.

 

202406164516_155145.png

 

I stand by my opinion: AZE is qualified, quota should go to CHN as the highest ranked at the WCh that is not yet qualified (just like USA was qualified so the quota went to ROU).

 

 

Edited by Faramir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, phelps said:

no

 

world championships quota are reallocated at the world champs, continental quota through the continental champs and world qualfication tournament's quota through the WQT

 

Wrestling Qualification System.JPG

 

which means that Sidakov's quota must go to :AZE Bayramov and the Azeri's quota must go to next in line in the tournament where Bayramov got the original quota place (= European qualifiers, so :ITA Chamizo)

 

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

 

I think any decent lawyer would easily win any dispute about it in a trial court

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

The NOC of Azerbaijan has a quota for the continental tournament. Why should they get another quota for the WСh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Faramir said:

Not at all. The rules are the same. This was for Tokyo.

 

202406164516_155145.png

 

 

well, then there was room for invalidate UWW's decision...I'm surprised that the US wrestler didn't fight for her right at the time

 

the words are more than clear: "the same event where the qualification was obtained" means only one thing, no room for interpretation

 

and Sidakov qualified at the world champs = next in line, Bayramov; then, Bayramov qualified at the continental tournament = next in line, Chamizo

 

any different outcome is definitely in contrast with the rules

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Art Art said:

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

The NOC of Azerbaijan has a quota for the continental tournament. Why should they get another quota for the WСh?

because the world champs were held earlier and have the priority...once Sidakov is out, the first not qualified athlete in that tournament (the key is this...the same tournament where the quota to be reallocated was obtained) is Bayramov

 

and once the Azeri gets the WC quota, then his continental qualification tournament's effort is void, useless...and the first in line in that continental tournament is Chamizo, who is the only man entitled to get that quota place

 

we'll see what happens, but if I were Italy (and any other Nation in the same position), I'd go to each and every court level available to defend that right

Edited by phelps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, phelps said:

words are more than clear: "the same event where the qualification was obtained" means only one thing, no room for interpretation

Yes, they are clear. The only hope for Chamizo was the reallocation of the Belarus quota won at the European tournament. But now we know that there's an eligible guy from Belarus.

 

Edited by Faramir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, phelps said:

because the world champs were held earlier and have the priority...once Sidakov is out, the first not qualified athlete in that tournament (the key is this...the same tournament where the quota to be reallocated was obtained) is Bayramov

 

and once the Azeri gets the WC quota, then his continental qualification tournament's effort is void, useless...and the first in line in that continental tournament is Chamizo, who is the only man entitled to get that quota place

 

we'll see what happens, but if I were Italy (and any other Nation in the same position), I'd go to each and every court level available to defend that right

Pay attention to this
 

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Art Art said:

Pay attention to this
 

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

that's absolutely respected...AZE only gets Bayramov's quota in any case

 

this is not a problem

 

the only question is the order of attribution of that quota place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Faramir said:

Yes, they are clear. The only hope for Chamizo was the reallocation of the Belarus quota won at the European tournament. Since there is an eligible guy from Belarus, Chamizo is 99% out.

 

 

I don't really think so

 

Bayramov got his original quota at the continetal tournament...that's the quota place to be reallocated if he gets the WC place (which is obvious, since he is the 1st in line that didn't get a WC quota)

 

p.s. however I won't be surprised if :ITA don't get that OQP, it's obvious that UWW cheaters now have our Country in the target for any possible form of disrespect

I only hope that our NOC would fight until the end, going also to the Swiss Civil Court if necessary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • Rather negative     Both towards Vollering and towards the coach, who has been making a mess of this for years now (like Tokyo). Vollering literally said "it was not good for me that Markus and Vos were still in the front towards the end"     One of the most well-known journalists (albeit a bit of a drama queen, but in this case, he's right): "Absurdly bad race by Vollering. Unbelievable."   An entire analysis titled "Vollering only thought of herself and threw away and almost certain Dutch medal": https://www.wielerflits.nl/nieuws/demi-vollering-dacht-alleen-aan-zichzelf-en-verspeelt-vrijwel-zekere-wk-medaille-voor-nederland/   Vollering: "They were all riding just to make me lose"   https://www.gelderlander.nl/video/productie/vollering-mij-laten-verliezen-wk-zurich-772648?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F   The 100th time Vollering shows she should simply not be in a team like this. It is always trouble, every single time. We need a team with like 6 Marianne Vos clones, she has the experience, she can read a race like absolutely nobody else in the world can and she plays her role, whether that's the team captain or working for someone else, without complaining and to the fullest extent.   Vollering is the exact opposite of Vos. Vollering rides for Team Vollering, which consists of Demi Vollering. No matter what.
    • What did Dutch press make out of it? It was one of the worst "teamworks" I have ever seen in cycling.
    • There is a ton of evidence, even if you don't believe the Bible is real,  that israel is our ancestral land.  And we simply took what's ours.  And in fact there was never anyone named Palestinians there.   Simply a name given to the region by the Roman's.  But the actual people is just a collective of individuals from different Arab countries where they were kicked out from.  And we are expected to cater to them.   There are plenty of other countries that should take them.   Iran, qatar, Iraq, Kuwait, Yemen, Algeria,  libiya, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco to name a few.   
    • Completely lost track of when the other final, but I just finished watching the pre-recorded version of it.   Team “Magic Mike” McEwen defeated Team Gushue 8-3 to win his third title (and in a row) of the season. 
    • Massive win indeed, a 80+ kilometer solo in the world championships, damn  (I mean, Sivakov jumped with him to try and help him of course, but couldn't do anything but sit in his wheel until he got dropped )
    • If even Erdogan calls you a psychopath, you're probably been....bad.    
    • Meanwhile:         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maher_al-Assad
    • Sure, some things are simply historical events retold with a kind of fantasy layer over it, to make it more appealing to read and/or - most importantly - to put some lessons into it, which is fine (and which is the main way to read most religious texts, as 'lessons' and messages by the writers instead of actual historical facts). But let's not pretend that things like Moses splitting the sea or the entire exodus have a significant historical basis, based on actual evidence. Anyway, like I said: I'm well aware people who believe the religious book of their choosing is a historical book aren't going to ever believe otherwise, I grew up in a town full of similiarly minded people  
    • Have you ever been to Israel? Because you can find historical evidence of many of the "stories"   And btw we are talking about 3000 years before us    
×
×
  • Create New...