website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

AIN athletes qualification for Paris 2024 Olympic Games and reallocation of quotas [post#1 updated 15.07]


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mard0n said:

How maximum 2 quota places through Continental Qualification rule work here? In the qualification system there is no clear definition of the maximum quotas possible to receive through reallocation. Only indicating 4 maximum per NOC. Or I'm wrong?

you're wrong, the reallocation follows the general rule of max 2 athletes per NOC (per gender)

 

up to 4 athletes per NOC (per gender) are only possible when all of them are qualified via World Ranking

2 hours ago, Faramir said:

I get why people think it will be reallocated to Chamizo (WCh quota to AZE and then European quota to ITA), but after reading a bit I think it will simply go to the Chinese, as the highest ranked at the WCh who is not yet qualified. The wording imo is quite clear and the same that was used for 2020(1), where for example the reallocation in women's 62kg went directly to ROU (and not to USA who had later won a PanAmerican quota, and thus the next best PanAm wrestler).

 

 

 

no

 

world championships quota are reallocated at the world champs, continental quota through the continental champs and world qualfication tournament's quota through the WQT

 

Wrestling Qualification System.JPG

 

which means that Sidakov's quota must go to :AZE Bayramov and the Azeri's quota must go to next in line in the tournament where Bayramov got the original quota place (= European qualifiers, so :ITA Chamizo)

 

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

 

I think any decent lawyer would easily win any dispute about it in a trial court

12 minutes ago, phelps said:

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

Not at all. The rules are the same. This was for Tokyo.

 

202406164516_155145.png

 

I stand by my opinion: AZE is qualified, quota should go to CHN as the highest ranked at the WCh that is not yet qualified (just like USA was qualified so the quota went to ROU).

 

 

Edited by Faramir
9 minutes ago, phelps said:

no

 

world championships quota are reallocated at the world champs, continental quota through the continental champs and world qualfication tournament's quota through the WQT

 

Wrestling Qualification System.JPG

 

which means that Sidakov's quota must go to :AZE Bayramov and the Azeri's quota must go to next in line in the tournament where Bayramov got the original quota place (= European qualifiers, so :ITA Chamizo)

 

what was done in the previous Olympic cycle doesn't count at all, this time rules are different, looking at the official document

 

I think any decent lawyer would easily win any dispute about it in a trial court

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

The NOC of Azerbaijan has a quota for the continental tournament. Why should they get another quota for the WСh?

1 minute ago, Faramir said:

Not at all. The rules are the same. This was for Tokyo.

 

202406164516_155145.png

 

 

well, then there was room for invalidate UWW's decision...I'm surprised that the US wrestler didn't fight for her right at the time

 

the words are more than clear: "the same event where the qualification was obtained" means only one thing, no room for interpretation

 

and Sidakov qualified at the world champs = next in line, Bayramov; then, Bayramov qualified at the continental tournament = next in line, Chamizo

 

any different outcome is definitely in contrast with the rules

6 minutes ago, Art Art said:

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

The NOC of Azerbaijan has a quota for the continental tournament. Why should they get another quota for the WСh?

because the world champs were held earlier and have the priority...once Sidakov is out, the first not qualified athlete in that tournament (the key is this...the same tournament where the quota to be reallocated was obtained) is Bayramov

 

and once the Azeri gets the WC quota, then his continental qualification tournament's effort is void, useless...and the first in line in that continental tournament is Chamizo, who is the only man entitled to get that quota place

 

we'll see what happens, but if I were Italy (and any other Nation in the same position), I'd go to each and every court level available to defend that right

Edited by phelps
16 minutes ago, phelps said:

words are more than clear: "the same event where the qualification was obtained" means only one thing, no room for interpretation

Yes, they are clear. The only hope for Chamizo was the reallocation of the Belarus quota won at the European tournament. But now we know that there's an eligible guy from Belarus.

 

Edited by Faramir
7 minutes ago, phelps said:

because the world champs were held earlier and have the priority...once Sidakov is out, the first not qualified athlete in that tournament (the key is this...the same tournament where the quota to be reallocated was obtained) is Bayramov

 

and once the Azeri gets the WC quota, then his continental qualification tournament's effort is void, useless...and the first in line in that continental tournament is Chamizo, who is the only man entitled to get that quota place

 

we'll see what happens, but if I were Italy (and any other Nation in the same position), I'd go to each and every court level available to defend that right

Pay attention to this
 

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

2 minutes ago, Art Art said:

Pay attention to this
 

"respecting the maximum quota per gender or per NOC". 

that's absolutely respected...AZE only gets Bayramov's quota in any case

 

this is not a problem

 

the only question is the order of attribution of that quota place

4 minutes ago, Faramir said:

Yes, they are clear. The only hope for Chamizo was the reallocation of the Belarus quota won at the European tournament. Since there is an eligible guy from Belarus, Chamizo is 99% out.

 

 

I don't really think so

 

Bayramov got his original quota at the continetal tournament...that's the quota place to be reallocated if he gets the WC place (which is obvious, since he is the 1st in line that didn't get a WC quota)

 

p.s. however I won't be surprised if :ITA don't get that OQP, it's obvious that UWW cheaters now have our Country in the target for any possible form of disrespect

I only hope that our NOC would fight until the end, going also to the Swiss Civil Court if necessary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...