heywoodu 15,018 Posted January 31, 2019 #2741 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Quote Points will be awarded as follows:- For right predicted Gold Medal Winner - 4 points.- For right predicted Silver Medal Winner - 3 points.- For right predicted Bronze Medal Winner - 2 points.- For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 1 point. I still just don't get this. Why 4 points for predicting the right gold medal winner, but 2 points for predicting the right bronze medal winner. Both are equal kind of predictions (predict athlete/nation X in position X) and quite often the silver or bronze medal winners are even significantly harder to predict than the gold medal winners, so you get less points for a harder prediction If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wumo 3,001 Posted January 31, 2019 #2742 Share Posted January 31, 2019 26 minutes ago, heywoodu said: I still just don't get this. Why 4 points for predicting the right gold medal winner, but 2 points for predicting the right bronze medal winner. Both are equal kind of predictions (predict athlete/nation X in position X) and quite often the silver or bronze medal winners are even significantly harder to predict than the gold medal winners, so you get less points for a harder prediction A point system based on right predicted podium places and medal winners would probably be better. My example: Points will be awarded as follows:- For predicting the correct podium (Correct Gold, Silver and Bronze Winner) - 8 points.- For predicting two correct podium places (Correct Gold-Silver or Gold-Bronze or Silver-Bronze Winner) - 6 points.- For predicting one correct podium place (Correct Gold or Silver or Bronze Winner) - 4 points.- For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 1 point. Example Event & Date Athletes Gold Silver Bronze Men's Downhill Day 4 February 9th, 2019 Max Franz Vincent Kriechmayr Matthias Mayer Hannes Reichelt Adrien Theaux Thomas Dressen Peter Fill Dominik Paris Kjetil Jansrud X Aksel Lund Svindal X Beat Feuz X Gilles Roulin Athlete from North America Any Other Athlete Results: 1. Aksel Lund Svindal 2. Kjetil Jansrud 3. Beat Feuz Your Total: 8 Points 1. Aksel Lund Svindal 2. Kjetil Jansrud 3. Any Other Athlete Your Total: 6 Points 1. Aksel Lund Svindal 2. Beat Feuz 3. Kjetil Jansrud For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 2 points Your Total: 6 Points 1. Aksel Lund Svindal 2. Beat Feuz 3. Any Other Athlete For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 1 point Your Total: 5 Points 1. Aksel Lund Svindal 2. Max Franz 3. Any Other Athlete Your Total: 4 Points 1. Kjetil Jansrud 2. Beat Feuz 3. Aksel Lund Svindal For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 3 points Your Total: 3 Points 1. Kjetil Jansrud 2. Aksel Lund Svindal 3. Any Other Athlete For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 2 points Your Total: 2 Points 1. Kjetil Jansrud 2. Max Franz 3. Any Other Athlete For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 1 point Your Total: 1 Point 1. Matthias Mayer 2. Max Franz 3. Any Other Athlete For right predicted Athlete/Nation but wrong place/medal - 0 points Your Total: 0 Points Wanderer and heywoodu 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heywoodu 15,018 Posted January 31, 2019 #2743 Share Posted January 31, 2019 That looks a lot better If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,686 Posted January 31, 2019 Author #2744 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) I asked long time ago for suggestions for the scoring systems and no one made a comment Edited January 31, 2019 by Wanderer Henry_Leon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heywoodu 15,018 Posted January 31, 2019 #2745 Share Posted January 31, 2019 14 minutes ago, Wanderer said: I asked long time ago for suggestions for the scoring systems and no one made a comment Because I hadn't seen it Just to clarify: I'm not complaining or saying "hey we have to change that now", most certainly not for this contest of course. Just wondering what the reason is and if it can't be improved for later prediction contests if there's enough support for such a thing. If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,686 Posted January 31, 2019 Author #2746 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Just now, heywoodu said: Because I hadn't seen it Just to clarify: I'm not complaining or saying "hey we have to change that now", most certainly not for this contest of course. Just wondering what the reason is and if it can't be improved for later prediction contests if there's enough support for such a thing. I knew I should tag people when I posted the invite There was a long discussion at the end of 2011 for the scoring systems (mainly because of the London 2012) and I think this one for individual sports is in use ever since, and is probably the one where users haven't complained almost at all. That's why nothing has changed. I wanted to have an agreement, and to use the same scoring system throughout the year but I am more then willing to accept all reasonable proposals. Have to admit, I like wumo's very much! If forum user's agree - I will be happy to apply it for the very next contest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heywoodu 15,018 Posted January 31, 2019 #2747 Share Posted January 31, 2019 14 minutes ago, Wanderer said: I knew I should tag people when I posted the invite There was a long discussion at the end of 2011 for the scoring systems (mainly because of the London 2012) and I think this one for individual sports is in use ever since, and is probably the one where users haven't complained almost at all. That's why nothing has changed. I wanted to have an agreement, and to use the same scoring system throughout the year but I am more then willing to accept all reasonable proposals. Have to admit, I like wumo's very much! If forum user's agree - I will be happy to apply it for the very next contest I always get a bit itchy when changes can 'only be made at the beginning of a new year', so I'm glad to read it doesn't have to be like that by definition wumo's idea seems perfectly fine to me, I'm curious to hear other people's opinions By the way, I don't have that much against the current one, if for some reason an agreement can't be made and we stick with this one that's just fine with me too and I promise I won't riot Spoiler BECAUSE I'LL LEAVE THE FORUM FOREVER AND SCREW YOU ALL If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunadan 1,103 Posted January 31, 2019 #2748 Share Posted January 31, 2019 (edited) I don't agree at all...I think the current system is much better and it's fair to give more points for gold. Example using wumo's suggestion: suppose you have a contest with 11 events (like alpine skiing). User A predicts correctly all bronze medals but nothing else...so 0 G, 0 S, 11 B for a total of 11 medallists in correct positions. User B predicts correctly gold and silver in 6 events and nothing else for a total of 12 medallists in correct position: 6 G, 6 S, 0 B. In my opinion User B predicted (much) better than User A but the standings would be: User A 44 points User B 36 points This doesn't make much sense to me. Edited January 31, 2019 by Dunadan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wumo 3,001 Posted January 31, 2019 #2749 Share Posted January 31, 2019 6 minutes ago, Dunadan said: I don't agree at all...I think the current system is much better and it's fair to give more points for gold. Example using wumo's suggestion: suppose you have a contest with 11 events (like alpine skiing). User A predicts correctly all bronze medals but nothing else...so 0 G, 0 S, 11 B for a total of 11 medallists in correct positions. User B predicts correctly gold and silver in 6 events and nothing else for a total of 12 medallists in correct position: 6 G, 6 S, 0 B. In my opinion User B predicted (much) better than User A but the standings would be: User A 44 points User B 36 points This doesn't make much sense to me. Just out of curiosity, why should a user be awarded more points for a correct predicted gold medallist than a correct predicted silver or bronze medallist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heywoodu 15,018 Posted January 31, 2019 #2750 Share Posted January 31, 2019 Let's look at swimming: is predicting Katie Ledecky - who utterly dominates long distances - to win 800m gold really a better prediction than being right in the much harder choice of who wins silver and/or bronze? If you'd like to help our fellow Totallympics member Bruna Moura get to the 2026 Winter Olympics, after her car crash on the way to the 2022 Olympics, every tiny bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Full story and how to help can be found here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now