mihamiha 124 Posted May 24, 2016 #111 Share Posted May 24, 2016 29 minutes ago, Wanderer said: I noticed that too and it does not feel right. I am not sure we can change the rules during the midseason (unless majority rise against the current rule) but we'll bring this discussion at the end of the year for sure. Personally, I am against multipliers. Even now, I tend to have them at minimal value, maximum 2 for the final round. its ok.i was saying this last year and nothings changed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 24, 2016 Author #112 Share Posted May 24, 2016 1 minute ago, mihamiha said: its ok.i was saying this last year and nothings changed I think it was asked in the poll last year and hence the current rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mihamiha 124 Posted May 24, 2016 #113 Share Posted May 24, 2016 1 minute ago, Wanderer said: I think it was asked in the poll last year and hence the current rule probably because all from 4th place down voted for double points to catch a medal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 24, 2016 Author #114 Share Posted May 24, 2016 1 minute ago, mihamiha said: probably because all from 4th place down voted for double points to catch a medal Haha maybe Though, back in 2011/2012 and maybe 2013 I think the diversity in medalists was much bigger than in last 2 years. I mean, medalists in our prediction contests is more predictable than matches we predict for contests lol And yet, other reason may be lack of players. Earlier prediction contests always had 70+ or 50+ players at least. Now we are around 30. That is poor. And I really wonder what is the reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mihamiha 124 Posted May 24, 2016 #115 Share Posted May 24, 2016 4 minutes ago, Wanderer said: Haha maybe Though, back in 2011/2012 and maybe 2013 I think the diversity in medalists was much bigger than in last 2 years. I mean, medalists in our prediction contests is more predictable than matches we predict for contests lol And yet, other reason may be lack of players. Earlier prediction contests always had 70+ or 50+ players at least. Now we are around 30. That is poor. And I really wonder what is the reason... we must raise prize money for medalists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 26, 2016 Author #116 Share Posted May 26, 2016 Provisional Standing after Day 4 available here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 27, 2016 Author #117 Share Posted May 27, 2016 Provisional Standing after Day 5 available here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 28, 2016 Author #118 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Provisional Standing after Day 6 available here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer 1,726 Posted May 28, 2016 Author #119 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Disaster Radwanska and Gasquet had to wake up now. Though, Radwanska's draw is really challenging Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agger 1,662 Posted May 28, 2016 #120 Share Posted May 28, 2016 Slow but steady, I'm moving up the rankings! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now