Olympian1010

I mean...there are a lot people on this forum who follow both genders and find equal interest (or at least enough interest) in both sports. Plus, women sports have been putting up great broadcast numbers in the United States, especially when given more optimal broadcast slots. I don't think equally, or better phrased "equity," means we need to ignore biological difference necessarily. You can have discus for both genders and have a slight weight difference. However, if a majority of female athletes wanted the weights equalized, then I don't see a problem really. Women also constitute a non-insignificant proportion of the global population. As someone with a degree in public relations, I'd argue the available research doesn't really support excluding large segments of your potential audience. Generally, not a great idea commercially or socially (at least in most circumstances). I also don't think it's crazy to request equally pay (or earning potential, or business rights, etc.) when doing (essentially) the same the job. Yes, I understand the men's leagues rake in a lot more money, but that's also related to have less historical barriers to practice sport, getting more broadcast time (and better time slots), and more media exposure. There are a lot of male athletes who complain about their pay, but still do some pretty remarkable things in sport. I think the last part of that thought is pretty moot. I mean...again...I think there may be some policy related reasons for that. I think there are also sports many American (or Japanese, or Ghanan, or Indian, etc.) viewers feel the same way about, but the beauty of the Olympics is the diversity of what's offered (at least in my opinion). Skateboarding might not make the Olympics "more relevant," but I think same could probably be applied conversely on that point (and if people have a problem with athletes being too young, that can be tweaked of course).

I do agree that is a major concern, if not huge problem, with the proposed format. The beauty of athletics is how accessible it is globally. World Athletics needs to make sure it stays that way (and the super shoes and world rankings format are already cause for concern in that regard).

To play “Devil’s advocate” on this issue, would the changes to the event actually make it about the “longest jump,” rather than the most accurate takeoff?

Definitely a story to keep tabs on… My initial thought is that I’m not opposed to this decision, but it will be interesting to see how this develops.

The amount of power IFs/NFs hold over athletes is a problem in my opinion. Just look at the abuse cases, or examples of athletes blacklisted for meeting bringing attention to issues within the sport or their national programs. I do think there is a legitimate power balance problem in international sports. I do understand funding issues (among others), of course. I just think the current state of affairs could be tweaked for the benefit of all.

NFs should only exist to facilitate athlete's participation. I'm not a fan of the "we have higher standards" crowd, personally.

I mean, each sport/event would likely have (at least) 8 of the best teams in the world represented, so an island representative (along with North/South America, Asia, Africa, Europe) wouldn't change things drastically. It would just offer a bit of universality. I disagree from the major of sports fans, but the the Olympics should be seen as an exposition/celebration of sport, not a glorified world championships. The best teams/athletes in the world should be there, but there should be room for universality too.

The 2017 edition conflicted with the Nordic World Championships, and some NOCs opted for one of the other. I think a few sent the "A" team to one, and then the "B" team to the other. Unless you need some points from the world championships, I don't know why you'd opt for them (especially if the bigger programs choose to go there.)

Not sure if it will be available outside the United States, but CBS aired a piece on Kelvin Kiptum after his recent death. They were going to release it ahead of his next race in April (The round table discussion at the end is “meh,” but the piece itself is nice)

36 countries and 1003 athletes have been entered according to the LOC/ICSD. won't participate unfortunately. More info on that decision: http://usdeafsports.org/news/usadsf-letter-on-the-20th-winter-deaflympics

The most realistic proposal, in my opinion, would be to let them compete under the Olympic flag (if they can qualify). I don't either side of the issue would be totally satisfied, but maybe it would be a workable compromise in the end?

Yeah, barring a change in the U.S. Government, it does feel like ultimately the IOC will be the organization forced to make a decision.

Injury total is up from initial reporting, and it's being reported by multiple news outlets that kids may be among those being treated for gunshot wounds (though reporting is still a bit murky on that)

It’s being reported that there was a shooting at the Kansas City Chief’s victory parade today. There’s a couple videos like the one above on social media, but it doesn’t seem like a lot of details are known at the minute.

Technically speaking, they will have changed their anthem for Paris 2024

Hong Kong isn’t really that sovereign since the PRC clampdown during the pandemic. It’s honestly a slap in the face of places like that they are allowed to compete at the Olympics (and yes, I do understand the nationality rules and how places were grandfathered in).

British Virgin Islands didn’t have their own anthem until McMaster’s won his first Commonwealth Games gold medal. They have since changed anthems though.

I'll pour one out for my fellow "singles."

I'm not sure they exist

As a thought exercise, since it doesn’t seem realistic, it would be interesting if we’re added to the Asian qualification pathway, and then all the island nations were given their own (Oceania, Caribbean, Indian Ocean).

I finally got around to watching We Dare To Dream, a feature length documentary about some of the refugee athletes at Tokyo 2020. The documentary is pretty much what I feel most of us would expect from a film like this. It provided a some background on the selected athletes, included some behind-the-scenes footage, and detailed their progress at the Olympics. It was pretty well produced, even if didn’t go very deep into the refugee crisis or emotions of the athletes themselves. Of note, it was directed by Waad al-Kateab, who produced/directed/filmed the critically acclaimed documentary For Sama. Angelina Jolie and John Legend were also credited as Executive Producers.

No, I meant cut the gendered versions in favor of the Mixed 4x100m Free. You could also cut the gendered 4x200m Free in favor of a Mixed 4x200m. The Mixed 4x100m Medley needs to cut as well. The medley relays work better as gendered events.

Swimming doesn’t need anymore events, but relays should be cut to 12 to leave a couple more quotas for individual events. I’d also cut the m/w 4x100 free (in favor of the mixed relay) to better use quotas, again.

Also, I’m American and I don’t understand the domestic/international craze for this sport. The prevalence of serious injuries and long game time with intermittent action don’t do it for me. I do see the cultural appeal to many people in the US, so I watch it as a causal fan mostly.

Yes, they use one of their four downs, but they don’t lose field position. Plus, an “incomplete pass” stops the clock from ticking down.