website statistics
Jump to content
  • Register/Login on Totallympics!

    Sign up to Totallympics to get full access to our website.

     

    Registration is free and allows you to participate in our community. You will then be able to reply to threads and access all pages.

     

    If you encounter any issues in the registration process, please send us a message in the Contact Us page.

     

    We are excited to see you on Totallympics, the home of Olympic Sports!

     

Australia National Thread


HawkAussie

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

Gold Medal Chances in

50m Free (M)

100m Free (M)

400m Free (M)

1500m Free (M)

100m Back (M)

200m Back (M)

4x100m Free (M)

50m Free (W)

100m Free (W)

100 Back (W)

200 Back (W)

200m Butterfly (W)

4x100m Free (W)

4x100m Med (W)

 

Strong medal contenders in

200m Free (M)

4x200m Free (M)

4x100m Med (M)

200m Free (W)

400m Free (W)

800m Free (W)

100m Butterfly (W)

200m Breastroke (W)

4x200m Freestyle (W)

 

But far, the strongest Australian swim team since 2004.

 

 

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29733
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

Hopefully Aussie swimmers will show up with their form from national trials. Wouldn't like to see Americans winning lots of golds :d

In 2012, Australia entered London with only 3 real chances in the pool.

100m Free (M)

4 x 100m Free (M)

4 x 100m Free (W)

 

The Missile misfired and our only Mens hopes were done.

The women came home with the relay gold.

So much more depth in 2016

Our World Championships results from 2015 were far more successful than 2011.

So many more performers.

Cate Campbell is currently the best female swimmer in the World.

She is in line for 4 Gold Medals alone and will start favourite in both the 50m and 100m free.

yep,its the Olympics and there will be disappointments,but there is something very exciting about this team.

Could this be the Olympics where the US are taken down?

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29742
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dantm said:

In 2012, Australia entered London with only 3 real chances in the pool.

100m Free (M)

4 x 100m Free (M)

4 x 100m Free (W)

 

The Missile misfired and our only Mens hopes were done.

The women came home with the relay gold.

So much more depth in 2016

Our World Championships results from 2015 were far more successful than 2011.

So many more performers.

Cate Campbell is currently the best female swimmer in the World.

She is in line for 4 Gold Medals alone and will start favourite in both the 50m and 100m free.

yep,its the Olympics and there will be disappointments,but there is something very exciting about this team.

Could this be the Olympics where the US are taken down?

 

It is always really, really difficult task, but as you say, this team does have much more depth. Remains to be seen ^.^

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29747
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

 

It is always really, really difficult task, but as you say, this team does have much more depth. Remains to be seen ^.^

Yep,the Americans always perform at the Olympics,but there was something lacking from their trials that I havent seen in a long time.(I watched their trials on NBC)

Sure,they have Katie Ledecky and Michael Phelps,but they drop off dramatically after those two.In most Olympic years you could almost guarantee their top 2 qualifyers would be top 5 rankings.There is a lot of gaps and the Americans will need to swim out of their skin to cover the obvious weaknesses.

They will probably do it and prove me wrong,but there is no doubt they are starting further back in the field that I can remember.

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29750
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

 

It is always really, really difficult task, but as you say, this team does have much more depth. Remains to be seen ^.^

Plus it's still a matter of peaking in the right moment, not exactly something the Aussie's are very much known for.. 

 

 

.

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29751
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, heywoodu said:

Plus it's still a matter of peaking in the right moment, not exactly something the Aussie's are very much known for.. 

 

 

Australia are the second most successful Swimming nation in Olympic History,only behind the US.

 

Ive heard this comment a few times and many bring up James Magnussen as the example.

Considering he is twice World Champion at the 100m Free and lost the Olympic Gold by 0.01 of a second,I think he has been harshly treated.In saying that,he put the pressure on himself and destroyed his Olympic campaign by a poor relay swim.

Yes,there are some serial tourists with Australian team(David McKeon) who continue to frustrate,but overall,we have exceeded expectations at most Olympics.

As I said before,our only hope in 2012.misfired and basically ended 2/3 of our only hopes.

Go beyond 2012,and you will see many examples of peaking at the right times( Stephanie Rice,Jodie Henry,Ian Thorpe,Grant Hackett, etc etc)

2012 toxic culture is long behind us,and now we have Jacco Verhaeren to keep them in check :)

 

Link to comment
https://totallympics.com/forums/topic/298-australia-national-thread/#findComment-29761
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Posts around Totallympics

    • I love that it is more straightforward in relation to the number of quotas and does not allow possible problems as it was in Tokyo and Paris.
    • I love the judo qualification system, for me is the best in all disciplines. It combines a strong circuit, and it allows 100 or so countries to participate in.   So, maybe, if UWW does its job properly, it will be a good thing.
    • China Media Group (CMG) will broadcast all 116 gold medal events of the Milan Winter Olympics live on CCTV-1, CCTV-5, CCTV-5+ and CCTV-16. It will also use technologies such as 4K/8K ultra-high definition to enhance the viewing experience. Live broadcasts of all events will be carried out from 16:00 Beijing time to 06:00 the next day.
    • The strength of the UK is that they are 100% focused on the track, while Italy must to navigate between the track and the road: the line-up is different for practically every event, etc. Paternoster should focus 100% on the track; she won't win anything big on the road anymore. As it is, she's weak both there and there. The situation is different with Balsamo, as she's also having significant success on the road and likely earns the most money there.
    • Discovery+ in the UK have also got their schedule up now.     I notice that only thing listed as being in UHD is the Opening Ceremony though....     
    • The problem over the last few years was that no-one was able to keep pace with the big Katie Archibald turns. Looks to be sorted now.  
    • The women's top 50 is so crammed with athletes from the same five nations that it is not inconceivable they are unable to fill the full quota from the top 50, in which case a third double spot would open up between USA/BEL/GBR
    • That women's pursuit team looks brutally fast. Batter you over the head into submission brutal, perhaps not seen since the early Trott-Rowsell days The 4 minute barrier could be on borrowed time.   The two British women sprinters Finucane and Caldwell also look pretty ominous, indeed the whole women's sprint team looks in some shape and with some depth to get that result without Finucane   Work to do for the British men's teams, but they won't be unhappy either, not to mention Joe Truman's unexpected Kilo win.
    • I prefer to do mine like this guy (https://app.podiumsport.it/) does his "Projected Medals" as probability based rather than straight medal picking... all things being equal, conversion rates should be about the same and the outliers come out in the wash. Unfortunately most people just like medal picking, and think any other approach is weird  
    • So probably: Men Oceania: Americas: Africa: Asia: One of  Europe: One of Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (probably not)  and whichever countries don’t qualify from Asian Games.  Universality: ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of the above in World Rankings    and one of  (most likely) or  seem safe with two quotas. The other will be favourites if a third team gets allocated two.    Women Oceania: Europe: One of Americas:  /  if US is ineligible due to their host quota, if the host quota gets reallocated then Canada will be in contention in the rankings Africa:   Asia: One of   Host: World Rankings: Combination of  (x1?)  (x1/2)  (x1/2), whichever doesn’t qualify out of  / ,  and  ? Final Qualification Tournament: One of above.  Universality: ?    is safe with two quotas between  it’ll be tough for whoever misses out of those three.   nevermind , 
×
×
  • Create New...