But to be honest, I think we are trying to do something a bit naive, which is to hope for peace all over the world and that all people feel represented by governments etc. It is a bit unreal... and reminds me about "Olympism", which is deep down an utopia.
That's why I think we will never really have "one-sided evil", so all these discussions are amazing but don't provide us with real answers. And that's why it shouldn't be a criteria to determine the participation of a NOC in the Olympic Games.
ExpandCivilians are not 'occupying forces', a ridiculous and offensive statement. Or are we expel anyone with some distant portuguese or african blood from Brazil and give it back in toto to its first finders?
It doesn't need to be about giving back, but to recognize it.
And specially in regards to New Caledonia, Tahiti and other French forces: how can one expect that a person born in France, tied to France and to a French company, working and living in the island for a few years, hoping to come back to France later, could have a fair saying on the future of the island?
And yeah, @De_GambassiBrazil does a horrible job regarding that.
I think it's naive to think Israel is not attacking Palestine for decades, so for...
ExpandNo, Kalaks are asking for independence. Kalaks are indigenous people in NC, but they are the minority. Your argument is not helped by reliance on such poor analogies.
They are minorities, because France politics sent a lot of French people there to settle and occupy, it makes total sense that the occupying forces are majority.
-
Who's Online 6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 95 Guests (See full list)
Posted
Thanks for being a sensible voice in this thread!
History and politics are not one-sided. But it's hard to people (directly affected specially) to notice it.
Link to post
Share on other sites