mihamiha

golden state in big trouble.they lost once again against oklahoma

4 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

 

Haha maybe

 

Though, back in 2011/2012 and maybe 2013 I think the diversity in medalists was much bigger than in last 2 years. I mean, medalists in our prediction contests is more predictable than matches we predict for contests lol And yet, other reason may be lack of players. Earlier prediction contests always had 70+ or 50+ players at least. Now we are around 30. That is poor. And I really wonder what is the reason... 

we must raise prize money for medalists

1 minute ago, Wanderer said:

 

I think it was asked in the poll last year and hence the current rule

 

probably because all from 4th place down voted for double points to catch a medal

29 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

 

I noticed that too and it does not feel right. I am not sure we can change the rules during the midseason (unless majority rise against the current rule) but we'll bring this discussion at the end of the year for sure.

Personally, I am against multipliers. Even now, I tend to have them at minimal value, maximum 2 for the final round.

its ok.i was saying this last year and nothings changed

its interesting,that from 15 rounds of competitions gold medallist africa boy had only 3 rounds better score than me,but because of double points in the end he won

pretty good draw for our guys.we can play with norway,belarus and france

surprises are coming like every year

maybe was marin too tired from final,because wawrinka also almost lost today

hercog in 2nd round

congrats to all contestents.

i thought this would be finnlands year in the end,but canada was better.

i lost a few gold medals by minimal margain now,but its ok.

finland will have to play better to win this today

5 hours ago, mihamiha said:

england-turkey friendly today

2:1 for england.first goal from kane was from offside

at least one good thing for russia fans

usa did come far with this team

england-turkey friendly today

sretan rođendan novak djoković

Hi,

just one thing for consideration(i mentioned this many times,but if you dont agree,ok).

i think we should give equal amount of points at all stages (iam not saying this because of hockey predictions,but),because if someone scores for example 50 points for 50 right predictions, i think its not fair that we give for example 20 points(or double) for 4 predictions.its not fair play.games are all the same,at first round and in the final.I think that those who predicted more right predictions than others should win.

like they try to do at formula,to give double points at last race.it just aint right.

i understand its democracy,so if you all agree with this rules.its ok.

just saying

mourinho after all at united?

uf,almost imposible to declare winners in both matches

harder as they expected,but canada won at the end

now iam not sure about final winner

united won at the end 2:1

overtime in fa cup

3:3

usa are once again surprising the world

2 minutes ago, Gianlu33 said:

 

Because I was surprised , I didn't expect this podium

yeah,youngster is in amazing form