website statistics
Jump to content

Summer Olympic Games 2020 Ceremonies


 Share
Followers 26

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Olympian1010 said:

New text for the Olympic Oath’s: 

According to the IOC Press Release, each Oath will now be taken by both and male and female representative as well.

next, IOC will "advise" parents to only give birth to twins (1 boy , 1 girl) . giving birth to a boy is against gender equality.

 

Bach really feels like he is the king of the universe. he can order whatever he wants.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 428
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

All useless, I heard that the Games will be cancelled in 16 days, a lot of countries will pull out, all confirmed by reliable inside sources.

First part meh,   Parade of Nations, I enjoyed, I´ll always enjoy, so sad we´ll miss one NOC this time ( )   Second part, much much better (after the speeched obviously).  The pic

you call that ceremony , i can do much better 

Posted Images

2 hours ago, MHSN said:

next, IOC will "advise" parents to only give birth to twins (1 boy , 1 girl) . giving birth to a boy is against gender equality.

 

Bach really feels like he is the king of the universe. he can order whatever he wants.

honestly when will they draw the line here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MHSN said:

next, IOC will "advise" parents to only give birth to twins (1 boy , 1 girl) . giving birth to a boy is against gender equality.

 

Bach really feels like he is the king of the universe. he can order whatever he wants.

 

images (29).jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, personally I do not find it as bad. A oath with 1 male and 1 female is ok. I think this should have been used much earlier.

 

In other hand I do not agree with the "forcing" M+W flagbearer thing, the NOC should have the right to decide itself who, how many and why they want to pick as their flagbearer(s)

Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, hckošice said:

To be fair, personally I do not find it as bad. A oath with 1 male and 1 female is ok. I think this should have been used much earlier.

Where is the equality when an oath about fair-play taken by a man apparently does not imply women, and vice versa? Men and women somehow have different fair-play standards or what?

 

What's next? Tennis matches having a male and a female head umpire?

All King Victor Emmanuel's Show Horses Can Make Really Beautiful People Fall

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, dcro said:

Where is the equality when an oath about fair-play taken by a man apparently does not imply women, and vice versa? Men and women somehow have different fair-play standards or what?

 

What's next? Tennis matches having a male and a female head umpire?

no, I meant a M as representing male athletes and a W representing all female ahletes. that is. I do not see anything wrong in this, really

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
×
×
  • Create New...