phelps 6,785 Posted August 17, 2019 Author #141 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Just now, Dunadan said: Any link to the official combined standings please? there are no standings on the official website, only the official start list for the Combined Event qualifications (which I just copied in my previous post)... women https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8633&cat=42&route=-1 men https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8633&cat=45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col_Frost 179 Posted August 17, 2019 #142 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Przed chwilą, phelps napisał: there are no standings on the official website, only the official start list for the Combined Event qualifications (which I just copied in my previous post)... women https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8633&cat=42&route=-1 men https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8633&cat=45 Au contraire Men https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8253&cat=45 Women https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8253&cat=42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phelps 6,785 Posted August 17, 2019 Author #143 Share Posted August 17, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Col_Frost said: I think there's a mistake in men's combined start list. Piccolruaz has 9728 points and that's correct, but Kim Hanwool should have 9520 and be in front of him and in semifinal. It's only for fun but if we assume that competitors will make the same results as in regular competition than finals and olympic quotas will look like this (for speed I included qualification results because I think that they are more meaningful than finals, but it didn't make bigger difference). Men's OQ: 1. Narasaki 2. Ondra 3. Schubert 4. Fossali 5. McColl 6. Megos 7. Khaibullin Women's OQ: 1. Garnbret 2. Noguchi 3. Miroslaw 4. Coxsey 5. Krampl 6. Jaubert 7. Seo Men's podium: 1. Narasaki 2. Ondra 3. Schubert Women's podium: 1. Garnbret 2. Noguchi 3. Miroslaw as I wrote before, not all the athletes that competed in the 3 individual disciplines are eligible for the Combined event (the climbers fighting for the Combined spots had to be named in advance, before the championship started -and there was a limit to each NOC about the number of those entries)... probably, Kim H.W. wasn't among the climbers chosen by the Korean team for this event (or he did retired from that because of an injury sustained in the past days...who knows?)... edit: nevermind...wrong interpretation of facts and rules... Edited August 17, 2019 by phelps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col_Frost 179 Posted August 17, 2019 #144 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Przed chwilą, phelps napisał: probably, Kim H.W. wasn't among the climbers chosen by the Korean team for this event (or he did retired from that because of an injury sustained in the past days...who knows?)... His name is on result list I linked in previous post and he has wrong result there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phelps 6,785 Posted August 17, 2019 Author #145 Share Posted August 17, 2019 (edited) Just now, Col_Frost said: Au contraire Men https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8253&cat=45 Women https://www.ifsc-climbing.org/index.php/world-competition/calendar#!comp=8253&cat=42 thanks for the links (I didn't find them before)... Edited August 17, 2019 by phelps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phelps 6,785 Posted August 17, 2019 Author #146 Share Posted August 17, 2019 (edited) Just now, Col_Frost said: His name is on result list I linked in previous post and he has wrong result there. no, it's not wrong...as they used only the quali in each discipline (not the overall result, as I wrote just a few seconds ago)... now everything is clear... EDIT: correction...they're wrong and you're right...they really made an error calculating the points of the Korean... probably they will correct that in the next hours and Piccolruaz will have a tough awakening tomorrow (Japanese time)... Edited August 17, 2019 by phelps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col_Frost 179 Posted August 17, 2019 #147 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Przed chwilą, phelps napisał: no, it's not wrong...as they used only the quali in each discipline (not the overall result, as I wrote just a few seconds ago)... now everything is clear... I don't get it. Both Kim and Piccolruaz didn't advance to any final so there's results are the same final or not. Piccolruaz has 32x19x16=9728 and it's correct, Kim has 16x35x17=9520 but he has 10106,25. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshMartini007 2,202 Posted August 17, 2019 #148 Share Posted August 17, 2019 There's also a chance that the tripartite quota won't be allocated (I think Pakistan in the men's was the only eligible nation competing at the World Championships) so that would be another quota reallocated to the world championships. phelps 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phelps 6,785 Posted August 17, 2019 Author #149 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Just now, Col_Frost said: I don't get it. Both Kim and Piccolruaz didn't advance to any final so there's results are the same final or not. Piccolruaz has 32x19x16=9728 and it's correct, Kim has 16x35x17=9520 but he has 10106,25. Why? sorry, as I wrote before, you're right...it's just that I couldn't believe they were wrong with the simple maths... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunadan 1,103 Posted August 17, 2019 #150 Share Posted August 17, 2019 Just now, Col_Frost said: His name is on result list I linked in previous post and he has wrong result there. Kim is 16th tied with another in lead and 17th tied with another in boulder 16.5×35×17.5= 10106.25 Col_Frost and phelps 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.abc6a3b43b2908e8a1e29072667c2d0f.thumb.jpg.82ec747c04b4a51c849f8f110e990412.jpg){kind=avatar}
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now