Well I'm happy that Sweden even is in WC at all. Germany is the favorite of course. But I hope Sweden can stand up against them and it will be a good game. Cheers.
No,its bad because majority of teams just want to defend their goal.
Its bad because this WC is inefficient,goals are rare,70% of match duration is spent by intercepting the ball in the middle,passing it to the goalkeeper and so on.
We dont see nice passes,nice saves,nice goals. We only see brute strength and "parking the buss".
Thank you for your explaination. I totally see your point. Cheers.
Yes, I know it looks strange. I usually cheer for the top teams. But I think it's fun for the sport if the underdogs also wins. And I don't agree with it's a bad WC only becausevthe top teams doing bad.
2002 wasnt that bad,at least we saw some good matches. I vividly recall Germany - Arabia. Ok,referees were terrible,Korea and Turkey played extemelly ugly football and still were in 1/2.
But this WC,every team just want to break the game. Its very similar how Greece won 2004 EC. Playing total defence. Every football fan despises that phylosophy.
Now we have 25 teams that are playing like Greece.
8 matches finished 1-0. Many goals were scored after stoppage.
We might miss Spain,Germany,Argentina,even Brazil after group stage. Cmon...
Tragic low level of WC.
It is a bad WC because the top nations doing bad? I think it's good for the sport if other teams get the chance sometimes. It's boring if the same teams wins all the time I think.
Posted
Damn 1-0 Nigeria.
Link to post
Share on other sites